Role of patent ductus arteriosus in preterms in long-term outcome

Objective: This study aimed to determine long-term neurodevelopmental outcome and cerebral oxygenation in extremely preterm infants, comparing those with a hemodynamic significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) to those without. Study design: We included infants born before 28 weeks of gestation from 2008 to 2010 with routine echocardiography. Prior to echocardiography, regional cerebral oxygen saturation was measured. At 5 years of age, we evaluated neurodevelopmental outcomes using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2nd Dutch edition for motor skills and the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence 3rd Dutch edition for cognition. Results: A total of 66 infants (gestational age 26.6 ± 0.9 weeks, birth weight 912 ± 176 g) were included, 34 infants with a hsPDA (including treatment). The group infants with hsPDA showed lower pre-closure cerebral saturation levels (58.2 % ±7.8 % versus 62.8 % ±7.0 %; p = 0.01). At 5 years, impaired motor outcome occurred more often in infants with hsPDA (17 (53 %) vs. 7 (23 %); p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis existence of hsPDA remained unfavourably related to the motor subdomain “aiming and catching”. There were no potential effects of hsPDA on cognitive performance at 5 years of age. Conclusion: Treatment-receiving infants with hsPDA appear to exhibit motor deficits, specifically in “aiming and catching”, by the age 5. Persistent ductal patency could be a contributing factor

A survey of the dose of inhalational agents used to maintain anaesthesia in infants

BACKGROUND: Various animal studies suggest that currently used anaesthetics are toxic to the developing brain. Many reviews advise that the total anaesthetic drug exposure should be reduced but the dose usually used in clinical practice has not been clearly elucidated. OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the dose ranges currently used in clinical practice during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia in infants undergoing anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery and diagnostic procedures. DESIGN: A two-centre mixed prospective (London) and retrospective (Utrecht) observational cohort study. SETTING: Two independent tertiary paediatric referral centres in March and November 2013; Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), London, United Kingdom and Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), The Netherlands. PATIENTS: A total of 76 infants were included in the analysis, 38 infants from each hospital. METHODS: Patients from GOSH were matched by procedure, age and weight with patients from the UMCU. The end-tidal concentrations of the inhalational agents were investigated from anaesthetic charts during the maintenance phase and corrected for the age-specific minimal alveolar concentration (MAC), expressed as a percentage from the MAC (%MAC). RESULTS: Three different types of inhalational anaesthetics were used: sevoflurane, desflurane, isoflurane. The mean %MAC was 0.85. No significant differences in %MAC were found between GOSH and the UMCU (P = 0.329); the mean %MAC in GOSH was 0.87 and in the UMCU was 0.82. There was a significant increase in the %MAC in relation to age (slope = 0.036 MAC month-1, P < 0.001). Of all patients, 75% had an end-tidal concentration lower than 1 MAC. There was no significant effect of the use of analgesia on the end-tidal concentration of inhalational anaesthetics (P = 0.366). CONCLUSION: The concentration of inhalational anaesthetics in %MAC increased with age and was lowest in neonates. Most young infants received inhalational anaesthetics at a concentration below 1 MAC, which accords with current guidance to minimise anaesthetic drug exposure but may have unintended consequences

A survey of the dose of inhalational agents used to maintain anaesthesia in infants

Background Various animal studies suggest that currently used anaesthetics are toxic to the developing brain. Many reviews advise that the total anaesthetic drug exposure should be reduced but the dose usually used in clinical practice has not been clearly elucidated. OBJECTIVES To provide an overview of the dose ranges currently used in clinical practice during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia in infants undergoing anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery and diagnostic procedures. DESIGN A two-centre mixed prospective (London) and retrospective (Utrecht) observational cohort study. SETTING Two independent tertiary paediatric referral centres in March and November 2013; Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), London, United Kingdom and Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), The Netherlands. PATIENTS A total of 76 infants were included in the analysis, 38 infants from each hospital. METHODS Patients from GOSH were matched by procedure, age and weight with patients from the UMCU. The end-tidal concentrations of the inhalational agents were investigated from anaesthetic charts during the maintenance phase and corrected for the age-specific minimal alveolar concentration (MAC), expressed as a percentage from the MAC (%MAC). RESULTS Three different types of inhalational anaesthetics were used: sevoflurane, desflurane, isoflurane. The mean %MAC was 0.85. No significant differences in %MAC were found between GOSH and the UMCU (P = 0.329); the mean %MAC in GOSH was 0.87 and in the UMCU was 0.82. There was a significant increase in the %MAC in relation to age (slope = 0.036 MAC month±1, P < 0.001). Of all patients, 75% had an end-tidal concentration lower than 1 MAC. There was no significant effect of the use of analgesia on the end-tidal concentration of inhalational anaesthetics (P = 0.366). CONCLUSION The concentration of inhalational anaesthetics in %MAC increased with age and was lowest in neonates. Most young infants received inhalational anaesthetics at a concentration below 1 MAC, which accords with current guidance to minimise anaesthetic drug exposure but may have unintended consequences