125 research outputs found

    The association of physician empathy with cancer patient outcomes: A meta-analysis.

    Get PDF
    In oncology, research remains unclear as to whether physician empathy is associated with patient outcomes. Our goal was to answer this question and explore potential moderators of the association. In this meta-analysis on adult cancer care, we excluded randomised controlled trials, and studies of survivors without active disease or involving analogue patients. Eight databases were searched, in addition to reference lists of relevant articles and grey literature. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and graded quality of evidence by using the AXIS tool. Effect size correlations (ESr) were chosen and pooled by using a random effect model. Subgroup analyses were performed, and statistically significant variables were introduced in a meta-regression. Several methods were used to explore heterogeneity and publication biases. We included 55 articles, yielding 55 ESr (n = 12,976 patients). Physician empathy was associated with favourable patient outcomes: ESr = 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.18 to 0.27), z = 9.58, p < 0.001. However, heterogeneity was high, as reflected by a large prediction interval, 95% (-0.07 to 0.49) and I <sup>2</sup> = 94.5%. The meta-regression explained 53% of variance. Prospective designs and physician empathy assessed by researchers, compared with patient-reported empathy, decreased ESr. Bad-news consultations, compared with all other types of clinical encounters, tended to increase ESr. Patient-reported physician empathy is significantly associated with cancer patient outcomes. However, the high heterogeneity warrants further longitudinal studies to disentangle the conditions under which physician empathy can help patients. Recommendations are proposed for future research

    Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses' consultations

    Get PDF
    Background: Increasingly healthcare policies emphasise the importance of person-centred, empathic care. Consequently, healthcare professionals are expected to demonstrate the ‘human’ aspects of care in training and in practice. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure is a patient-rated measure of the interpersonal skills of healthcare practitioners. It has been widely validated for use by healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care. This paper reports on the validity and reliability of the CARE Measure with sexual health nurses. Methods: Patient questionnaires were collected for 943 consultations with 20 sexual health nurses. Participating patients self-completed the questionnaire immediately after the encounter with the nurse. The questionnaire included the ten item CARE Measure, the Patient Enablement Index, and overall satisfaction instruments. Construct validity was assessed through Spearman’s correlation and principal component analysis. Internal consistence was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha and the inter-rater reliability through Generalisability Theory. Data were collected in 2013 in Scotland. Results: Female patients completed 68% of the questionnaires. The mean patient age was 28.8 years (standard deviation 9.8 years). Two of the 20 participating nurses withdrew from the study. Most patients (71.7%) regarded the CARE Measure items as very important to their consultation and the number of ‘not applicable’ and missing responses’ were low (2.6% and 0.1% respectively). The participating nurses had high CARE Measure scores; out of a maximum possible score of 50, the overall mean CARE measure score was 47.8 (standard deviation 4.4). The scores were moderately correlated with patient enablement (rho = 0.232, p = 0.001) and overall satisfaction (rho = 0.377, p = 0.001. Cronbach’s alpha showed the measure’s high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.95), but the inter-rater reliability could not be calculated due to the high achieved CARE Measure scores that varied little between nurses. Conclusions: Within this clinical context the CARE Measure has high perceived relevance and face validity. The findings support construct validity and some evidence of reliability. The high CARE Measure scores may have been due to sample bias. A future study which ensures a representative sample of patients on a larger group of nurses is required to determine whether the measure can discriminate between nurses

    Measuring empathy in pediatrics: validation of the Visual CARE measure

    Get PDF
    Background: Empathy is a key element of “Patient and Family Centered Care”, a clinical approach recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. However, there is a lack of validated tools to evaluate paediatrician empathy. This study aimed to validate the Visual CARE Measure, a patient rated questionnaire measuring physician empathy, in the setting of a Pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Methods: The empathy of physicians working in the Pediatric ED of the University Hospital of Udine, Italy, was assessed using an Italian translation of the Visual Care Measure. This test has three versions suited to different age groups: the 5Q questionnaire was administered to children aged 7–11, the 10Q version to those older than 11, and the 10Q–Parent questionnaire to parents of children younger than 7. The internal reliability, homogeneity and construct validity of the 5Q and 10Q/10Q–Parent versions of the Visual Care Measure, were separately assessed. The influence of family background on the rating of physician empathy and satisfaction with the clinical encounter was also evaluated. Results: Seven physicians and 416 children and their parents were included in the study. Internal consistency measured by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95 for the 10Q/10Q–Parent versions and 0.88 for the 5Q version. The item-total correlation was > 0.75 for each item. An exploratory factor analysis showed that all the items load onto the first factor. Physicians’ empathy scores correlated with patients’ satisfaction for both the 10Q and 10Q–Parent questionnaires (Spearman’s rho = 0.7189; p < 0.001) and for the 5Q questionnaire (Spearman’s rho = 0.5968; p < 0,001). Trust in the consulting physician was lower among immigrant parents (OR 0.43. 95% CI 0.20–0.93). Conclusions: The Visual Care Measure is a reliable second-person test of physician empathy in the setting of a Pediatric Emergency Room. More studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of this instrument in other pediatric settings distinct from the Emergency Room and to further evaluate its utility in measuring the impact of communication and empathy training programmes for healthcare professionals working in pediatrics

    La communication dans la relation de soin : rôle du psychologue

    No full text

    Un modèle prédictif de la qualité de vie

    No full text

    Chapitre 6 : Gestalt-thérapie

    No full text

    Régulation des émotions, stress et maladie

    No full text
    National audienceCe traité constitue une synthèse des connaissances sur la régulation des émotions et répond à l'ensemble des questions que les chercheurs, enseignants, praticiens et étudiants pourraient se poser sur cette thématique.La capacité à réguler ses émotions, c'est-à-dire à les atténuer ou à les intensifier en fonction du contexte, influence considérablement la qualité de vie. Les personnes ayant des difficultés à réguler leurs émotions sont globalement moins épanouies, présentent davantage de risques de développer des troubles psychiatriques et/ou des ennuis de santé, et rencontrent proportionnellement plus de difficultés au travail.Cet ouvrage fournit un panorama complet des connaissances sur la régulation des émotions. Il aborde notamment :- les gènes qui influencent l'aptitude à réguler ses émotions ;- ce qui se produit dans notre cerveau et notre corps quand nous éprouvons et/ou régulons une émotion ;- l'influence de la manière dont nous traitons l'information sur nos émotions et notre capacité à les réguler ;- les stratégies de régulation les plus efficaces ;- la manière dont différents courants (systémique, psychanalyse, cognitivo-comportemental, humaniste, positiviste, pleine conscience...) conçoivent la régulation des émotions ;- le travail de la régulation des émotions dans différents troubles (dépression, anxiété, alcoolisme, états-limites, deuil pathologique, schizophrénie...) ;- l'impact des émotions et des différentes manières de les réguler sur la santé physique ;- l'influence des émotions et de la régulation des émotions dans les rapports sociaux (notamment inter-groupes) ;- l'influence des émotions et de la régulation des émotions à l'école et en entreprise ;- la manière dont les aptitudes de régulation des émotions se développent chez l'enfant (typique et atypique).Ce traité s'imposera comme le compagnon indispensable du thérapeute, ainsi que de l'étudiant et du chercheur en psychologie et en psychiatrie. Il intéressera par ailleurs quiconque souhaite mieux comprendre ses émotions et la manière de les apprivoiser
    corecore