Cost-Effectiveness Modelling of Sequential Biologic Strategies for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Finland

Abstract: Objective: The main objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic options in moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when a clinical response to a first TNF-blocker, either etanercept (ETA), adalimumab (ADA), or infliximab (INF), is insufficient. Methods: Effectiveness criteria were defined as remission (RS), low disease activity (LDAS), and moderate to high disease activity (MHDAS). Cost-effectiveness was derived as cost per day in RS and in LDAS using simulation modelling to assess six sequential biologic strategies over 2 years. Each sequential treatment strategy was composed of three biologic agents and included a first anti-TNF agent, ETA, ADA or INF, followed by either abatacept (ABA) or rituximab (RTX) as a second therapeutic option in case of an insufficient response, followed by another anti-TNF agent in case of further insufficient response. Results: Over two years and taking into account biologic costs, the following estimated mean costs per day in RS and LDAS were respectively of �829 and �428 for the biologic sequence composed of ADA-ABA-ETA, �1292 and �516 for the sequence ADA-RTX-ETA, �829 and �429 for the sequence ETA-ABA-ADA, �1292 and �517 for the sequence ETA-RTX-ADA, �840 and �434 for the sequence INF-ABA-ETA, and �1309 and �523 for the sequence INF-RTX-ETA. Conclusion: The treatment sequences including ABA as the second biologic option appear more cost-effective than those including RTX in a patients with moderate to severe RA and an insufficient response to a first anti-TNF agent. Keywords: Cost-effectiveness, rheumatoid arthritis, biologics, modelling