114 research outputs found
Strengthening human resources for primary health care
This chapter reviews the progress made in recent years to strengthen human
resources to deliver health care within a Primary Health Care approach. It focuses
specifically on the availability and preparedness of old and new cadres of health
workers, their distribution within the South African health system, as well as their
training and development. Findings suggest that overall the health workforce is
substantially weaker today than it was in the mid-1990s. There are fewer doctors
and nurses available for the vast majority of public sector dependent population,
as production has not kept up with population growth, increasing care needs and
attrition. Disparities between provinces remain, and disparities between the private
and public sectors have grown. The nursing sector faces a serious crisis brought on by
an aging professional population. Progress with the development of mid-level cadres
has been slow, with pharmacy being the exception. Furthermore, the implementation
of community health worker programmes remains fragmented and uneven.
Importantly, while there has been curriculum reform in many medical schools, there
has been no fundamental shift in the orientation and resourcing of health professions.
Health workers entering primary or community care services, thus, often remain illprepared
and find themselves poorly supported and resourced. It is suggested that
the following areas must be a priority in the human resource agenda in coming years:
an accelerated production of professionals and mid-level cadres; comprehensive
curriculum audits; the regulation and integration of community health workers; and
an integrated and comprehensive reconfiguration of Primary Health Care teams
Strengthening human resources for health systems resilience to care for mothers and children
What do we need to do better to ensure better health, and less preventable morbidity and mortality among mothers, babies and young children? This is the question asked by the papers of this special edition. In their introductory commentary, Fotso and Fogarty point to substantial progress made in improving young childrenās health, and some progress in improving health for mothers. But clearly our efforts globally are not good enough if eight million children and 350,000 pregnant and postpartum women still die annually of preventable causes. The answer is simple and yet target-defeatingly complex: access to skilled, equipped, supported and motivated health workers who serve women through
pregnancy, delivery and postpartum care. Furthermore, both question and answer are ultimately not about MNCH, nor ājustā about human resources for MNCH,
but about functioning and resilient health systems, which provide the frame, the resources, and the support within which health workers function and interact with
communities and young mothers.Web of Scienc
Strengthening post-graduate educational capacity for health policy and systems research and analysis: the strategy of the Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa
BACKGROUND: The last 5ā10 years have seen significant international momentum build around the field of health
policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR + A). Strengthening post-graduate teaching is seen as central to the
further development of this field in low- and middle-income countries. However, thus far, there has been little
reflection on and documentation of what is taught in this field, how teaching is carried out, educatorsā challenges
and what future teaching might look like.
METHODS: Contributing to such reflection and documentation, this paper reports on a situation analysis and inventory
of HPSR + A post-graduate teaching conducted among the 11 African and European partners of the Consortium for
Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa (CHEPSAA), a capacity development collaboration. A first questionnaire
completed by the partners collected information on organisational teaching contexts, while a second collected
information on 104 individual courses (more in-depth information was subsequently collected on 17 of the courses).
The questionnaires yielded a mix of qualitative and quantitative data, which were analysed through counts,
cross-tabulations, and the inductive grouping of material into themes. In addition, this paper draws information
from internal reports on CHEPSAAās activities, as well as its external evaluation.
RESULTS: The analysis highlighted the fluid boundaries of HPSR + A and the range and variability of the courses
addressing the field, the important, though not exclusive, role of schools of public health in teaching relevant
material, large variations in the time investments required to complete courses, the diversity of student target
audiences, the limited availability of distance and non-classroom learning activities, and the continued importance of
old-fashioned teaching styles and activities.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper argues that in order to improve post-graduate teaching and continue to build the field of
HPSR + A, key questions need to be addressed around educational practice issues such as the time allocated for
HPSR + A courses, teaching activities, and assessments, whether HPSR + A should be taught as a cross-cutting theme in
post-graduate degrees or an area of specialisation, and the organisation of teaching given the multi-disciplinary nature
of the field. It ends by describing some of CHEPSAAās key post-graduate teaching development activities and how
these activities have addressed the key questions.Web of Scienc
Lay health workers and HIV programmes: Implications for health systems
One of the consequences of massive investment in antiretroviral access and other AIDS programmes has been the
rapid emergence of large numbers of lay workers in the health systems of developing countries. In South Africa,
government estimates are 65,000, mostly HIV/TB care-related lay workers contribute their labour in the public
health sector, outnumbering the main front-line primary health care providers and professional nurses. The
phenomenon has grown organically and incrementally, playing a wide variety of care-giving, support and
advocacy roles. Using South Africa as a case, this paper discusses the different forms, traditions and
contradictory orientations taken by lay health work and the system-wide effects of a large lay worker presence.
As pressures to regularise and formalise the status of lay health workers grow, important questions are raised as
to their place in health systems, and more broadly what they represent as a new intermediary layer between state
and citizen. It argues for a research agenda that seeks to better characterise types of lay involvement in the health
system, particularly in an era of antiretroviral therapy, and which takes a wider perspective on the meanings of
this recent re-emergence of an old concept in health systems heavily affected by HIV/AIDS.International Bibliography of Social Science
Practicing governance towards equity in health systems: LMIC perspectives and experience.
The unifying theme of the papers in this series is a concern for understanding the everyday practice of governance in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) health systems. Rather than seeing governance as a normative health system goal addressed through the architecture and design of accountability and regulatory frameworks, these papers provide insights into the real-world decision-making of health policy and system actors. Their multiple, routine decisions translate policy intentions into practice - and are filtered through relationships, underpinned by values and norms, influenced by organizational structures and resources, and embedded in historical and socio-political contexts. These decisions are also political acts - in that they influence who accesses benefits and whose voices are heard in decision-making, reinforcing or challenging existing institutional exclusion and power inequalities. In other words, the everyday practice of governance has direct impacts on health system equity.The papers in the series address governance through diverse health policy and system issues, consider actors located at multiple levels of the system and draw on multi-disciplinary perspectives. They present detailed examination of experiences in a range of African and Indian settings, led by authors who live and work in these settings. The overall purpose of the papers in this series is thus to provide an empirical and embedded research perspective on governance and equity in health systems
Staffing remote rural areas in middle- and low-income countries: A literature review of attraction and retention
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many countries in middle- and low-income countries today suffer from severe staff shortages and/or maldistribution of health personnel which has been aggravated more recently by the disintegration of health systems in low-income countries and by the global policy environment. One of the most damaging effects of severely weakened and under-resourced health systems is the difficulty they face in producing, recruiting, and retaining health professionals, particularly in remote areas. Low wages, poor working conditions, lack of supervision, lack of equipment and infrastructure as well as HIV and AIDS, all contribute to the flight of health care personnel from remote areas. In this global context of accelerating inequities health service policy makers and managers are searching for ways to improve the attraction and retention of staff in remote areas. But the development of appropriate strategies first requires an understanding of the factors which influence decisions to accept and/or stay in a remote post, particularly in the context of mid and low income countries (MLICS), and which strategies to improve attraction and retention are therefore likely to be successful. It is the aim of this review article to explore the links between attraction and retention factors and strategies, with a particular focus on the organisational diversity and location of decision-making.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This is a narrative literature review which took an iterative approach to finding relevant literature. It focused on English-language material published between 1997 and 2007. The authors conducted Pubmed searches using a range of different search terms relating to attraction and retention of staff in remote areas. Furthermore, a number of relevant journals as well as unpublished literature were systematically searched. While the initial search included articles from high- middle- and low-income countries, the review focuses on middle- and low-income countries. About 600 papers were initially assessed and 55 eventually included in the review.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The authors argue that, although factors are multi-facetted and complex, strategies are usually not comprehensive and often limited to addressing a single or limited number of factors. They suggest that because of the complex interaction of factors impacting on attraction and retention, there is a strong argument to be made for bundles of interventions which include attention to living environments, working conditions and environments and development opportunities. They further explore the organisational location of decision-making related to retention issues and suggest that because promising strategies often lie beyond the scope of human resource directorates or ministries of health, planning and decision-making to improve retention requires multi-sectoral collaboration within and beyond government. The paper provides a simple framework for bringing the key decision-makers together to identify factors and develop multi-facetted comprehensive strategies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There are no set answers to the problem of attraction and retention. It is only through learning about what works in terms of fit between problem analysis and strategy and effective navigation through the politics of implementation that any headway will be made against the almost universal challenge of staffing health service in remote rural areas.</p
Building capacity to develop an African teaching platform on health workforce development: a collaborative initiative of universities from four sub Saharan countries
INTRODUCTION: Health systems in many low-income countries remain fragile, and the record of human resource planning and management in Ministries of Health very uneven. Public health training institutions face the dual challenge of building human resources capacity in ministries and health services while alleviating and improving their own capacity constraints. This paper reports on an initiative aimed at addressing this dual challenge through the development and implementation of a joint Masters in Public Health (MPH) programme with a focus on health workforce
development by four academic institutions from East and Southern Africa and the building of a joint teaching platform.
METHODS: Data were obtained through interviews and group discussions with stakeholders, direct and participant observations, and reviews of publications and project documents. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
CASE DESCRIPTION: The institutions developed and collaboratively implemented a āMasters Degree programme with a focus on health workforce developmentā. It was geared towards strengthening the leadership capacity of Health ministries to develop expertise in health human resources (HRH) planning and management, and simultaneously build capacity of faculty in curriculum development and innovative educational practices to teach health workforce development. The initiative was configured to facilitate sharing of experience and resources.
DISCUSSION: The implementation of this initiative has been complex, straddling multiple and changing contexts, actors and agendas. Some of these are common to postgraduate programmes with working learners, while others are unique to this
particular partnership, such as weak institutional capacity to champion and embed new programmes and approaches to teaching.
CONCLUSIONS: The partnership, despite significant inherent challenges, has potential for providing real opportunities for building the field and community of practice, and strengthening the staff and organizational capacity of participant institutions. Key learning points of the paper are:
*the need for long-term strategies and engagement;
*the need for more investment and attention to developing the capacity of academic institutions;
*the need to invest specifically in educational/teaching expertise for innovative approaches to teaching and capacity development more broadly; and
*the importance of increasing access and support for students who are working adults in public health institutions throughout Africa.Web of Scienc
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: South African examples of a leadership of sensemaking for primary health care
BACKGROUND: New forms of leadership are required to bring about the fundamental
health system changes demanded by primary health care (PHC). Using theory about
complex adaptive systems and policy implementation, this paper considers how
actors' sensemaking and the exercise of discretionary power currently combine to
challenge PHC re-orientation in the South African health system; and provides
examples of leadership practices that promote sensemaking and power use in
support of PHC.
METHODS: The paper draws on observational, interview, and reflective data
collected as part of the District Innovation and Action Learning for Health
Systems Development (DIALHS) project being implemented in Cape Town, South
Africa. Undertaken collaboratively between health managers and RESEARCHERS, the
project is implemented through cycles of action-learning, including systematic
reflection and synthesis. It includes a particular focus on how local health
managers can better support front line facility managers in strengthening PHC.
RESULTS: The results illuminate how the collective understandings of staff
working at the primary level - of their working environment and changes within it
- act as a barrier to centrally-led initiatives to strengthen PHC. Staff often
fail to take ownership of such initiatives and experience them as disempowering.
Local area managers, located between the centre and the service frontline, have a
vital role to play in providing a leadership of sensemaking to mediate these
challenges. Founded on personal values, such leadership entails, for example,
efforts to nurture PHC-aligned values and mind-sets among staff; build
relationships and support the development of shared meanings about change; instil
a culture of collective inquiry and mutual accountability; and role-model
management practices, including using language to signal meaning.
CONCLUSIONS: PHC will only become a lived reality within the South African health
system when frontline staff are able to make sense of policy intentions and
incorporate them into their everyday routines and practices. This requires a
leadership of sensemaking that enables front line staff to exercise their
collective discretionary power in strengthening PHC. We hope this
theoretically-framed analysis of one set of experiences stimulates wider thinking
about the leadership needed to sustain primary health care in other settings.The DIAHLS project is funded by the Atlantic Philanthropies. This paper was prepared with support from the Collaboration for Health Systems, Analysis and Innovationā and is part of the Thematic Series entitled: āAdvancing the application of systems thinking in healthā. The Series was coordinated by the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems research, World Health Organization. The publication of the Series and the associated capacity building and dissemination activities were carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.Web of Scienc
Boundary-spanning: reflections on the practices and principles of Global Health.
As Global Health evolves, not merely as a metaphor for international collaboration, but as a distinct field of practice, it warrants greater consideration of how it is practiced, by whom, and for what goals. We believe that, to become more relevant for the health systems and communities that are their intended beneficiaries, Global Health practices must actively span and disrupt boundaries of geography, geopolitics and constituency, some of which are rooted in imbalances of power and resources. In this process, fostering cross-country learning networks and communities of practice, and building local and national institutions with a global outlook in low and middle-income countries, are critically important. Crucially, boundary-spanning practices in Global Health require a mindset of inclusiveness, awareness of and respect for different coexisting realities
- ā¦