Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Induced Left Bundle Branch Block: Causes and Consequences

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative treatment option for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who do not qualify for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Besides its proven clinical benefits, one of the complications of TAVI is the creation of conduction abnormalities, like left bundle branch block (LBBB). New LBBB occurs between 7 and 65 % of cases, numbers that differ considerably between devices. In this review, we discuss the possible causes and the clinical significance of TAVI-induced LBBB. Several device- and procedural-related factors seem responsible for the development of LBBB, of which depth of implantation and balloon-annulus diameter ratio are the most important ones. TAVI-induced LBBB negatively affects cardiac function and hospitalization, but its impact on mortality is subject of debate. Future research and registries should implement strict diagnostic criteria for LBBB together with recording of its timing and persistence

Occurrence, fate and consequences of ventricular conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is frequently complicated by new left bundle branch block (LBBB). We investigated the development and persistence of LBBB during follow-up and its clinical consequences. Methods and results: ECGs at baseline, within 24 hours, before discharge and at 12 months after TAVI were assessed in 476 patients without pre-existing LBBB and/or pacemaker before or after TAVI. TAVI-induced new LBBB was categorised based on the timing of the occurrence (within 24 hours [acute], after 24 hours but before discharge [subacute], and after discharge [late]), in addition to persistence (transient or persistent). A total of 175 patients (36.8%) developed new LBBB of which 85.7% occurred within 24 hours after TAVI, 12.0% before and 2.3% after hospital discharge, and was persistent in 111 patients (63.4%). Implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve System (MCS) more frequently led to new LBBB than the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN valve (ES) (53.8% versus 21.7%) with less recovery during follow-up (39.0% versus 9.5%). Late new LBBB was only seen in four patients (0.8%). During a median follow-up of 915 (578-1,234) days, persistent LBBB was associated with a significant increase in mortality as compared to no LBBB and temporary LBBB combined (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.03; p=0.01). Conclusions: TAVI-induced new LBBB occurs in almost 40% of patients, almost all before hospital discharge. It occurs three times more frequently after MCS than after ES valve implantation and has a twofold lower tendency to resolve during follow-up. Persistent LBBB is associated with a higher mortality

Trends in the Occurrence of New Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate trends over time in the occurrence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Medtronic CoreValve System (MCS) and Edwards SAPIEN Valve (ESV). Background: TAVI-induced conduction abnormalities (TAVI-CAs) such as LBBB and the need for PPI are frequent postoperative complication. New techniques, procedural refinements, and increased awareness are focused on the reduction of these abnormalities. MethodsElectrocardiograms of 549 patients without preprocedural LBBB and/or pacemaker were assessed to determine the frequency and nature of TAVI-CAs. To study the effect of experience, patients were subdivided per center into tertiles based on the number of procedures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to study predictors of TAVI-induced LBBB (TAVI-LBBB) and PPI. ResultsTAVI-LBBB occurred in 185 patients (33.7%) and significantly decreased over time, from 42.6% to 27.3% (P=0.006). This effect was only significant after implantation of the MCS (59.6% vs. 46.5% vs. 31.1%, P=0.001, ESV: 22.6% vs. 13.1% vs. 24.8%, P=0.11). Between tertiles there was no difference in the frequency of PPI after TAVI (n=73, 13.1% vs. 14.8% vs. 12%, P=0.74). Multivariate analysis revealed that, independent from valve type, depth of implantation was the only significant predictor of TAVI-LBBB (OR [95% C.I.]: 1.16 [1.10-1.24],