Comparison of effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Halo-femoral traction could gradually improve the coronal and sagittal deformity and restore the trunk balance through the elongation of the spine. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of Halo-femoral traction after anterior spinal release in the management of severe idiopathic and congenital scoliosis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Sixty patients with severe and rigid curve treated with anterior spinal release, Halo-femoral traction, and second stage posterior spinal fusion were recruited for this retrospective study. Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) group was 30 patients (23 females and 7 males) with mean age of 15.5 years. The average coronal Cobb angle was 91.6° and the mean global thoracic kyphosis was 50.6°. The curve type of these patients were 2 with Lenke 1AN, 4 with Lenke 1A+, 1 with Lenke 1BN, 10 with Lenke 1CN, 3 with Lenke 1C+, 3 with Lenke 3CN, 3 with Lenke 3C+, and 4 with Lenke 5C+. Congenital Scoliosis (CS) group included 30 patients (20 females and 10 males) with average age of 15.2 years. The average coronal Cobb angle of the main curve before operation was 95.7° and the average thoracic kyphosis was 70.2°. All patients had a minimum 12-month follow-up radiograph (range 12–72 months, mean 38 months).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The average traction time was 23 days and the average traction weight was 16 kg. Four patients experienced brachial plexus palsy and complete nerve functional restoration was achieved at two months follow-up. For the IS group, the post-operative mean Cobb angle of major curve averaged 40.1° with correction rate of 57.5%. For the CS group, the post-operative mean Cobb angle was 56.5° with average correction rate of 45.2%. The difference in curve magnitude between the IS and CS patients after posterior correction was statistically significant (t = 4.15, p < 0.001). The correction rate of kyphosis between IS and CS patients was also statistically significant (t = -2.59, p < 0.016).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Halo-femoral traction was a safe, well-tolerated and effective method for the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis patients. The posterior correction rate obtained after anterior release and traction was significant superior than that recorded from side bending film in current study.</p

Surgical management of severe rigid tuberculous kyphosis of dorsolumbar spine

To assess the effectiveness of deformity correction and safety of the two major corrective spinal surgical procedures, 35 patients, aged 14–47 years, were placed into two groups according to procedures performed. Sixteen patients (group A) had four-stage procedures including initial halo-pelvic distraction after anterior release and a subsequent three procedural steps plus brace. Nineteen patients (group B) had one-set two-stage procedures: wire segmental stabilisation in eight cases and rod/hook and/or pedicle screw stabilisation in 11 cases. Average preoperative kyphosis in group A was 88° and postoperative at zero, three, six, and 18 months were 29˚, 33˚, 35˚ and 35˚, respectively, while those of group B were 86˚ preoperative and postoperative 27˚, 31˚, 33˚, and 33˚, respectively. Neural complication developed in five cases: one in group A and four in group B. It was concluded that the one-set two-stage procedure is more efficient, time-saving, and cost-effective, though it is highly challenging with relatively high rates of neural complication