"NEPP" PERITONEAL DIALYSIS REGIMEN HAS BENEFICIAL EFFECTS ON PLASMA CEL AND 3-DG, BUT NOT PENTOSIDINE, CML, AND MGO

♦ Background: Standard peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions contain high levels of glucose and glucose degradation products (GDPs), both contributing to the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). We studied the contribution to plasma GDP and AGE levels of 2 PD regimens that differ in glucose and GDP loads: high load [standard PD (sPD) using 4 glucose–lactate exchanges] and low load [1 amino acid exchange, 1 icodextrin exchange, and 2 glucose–bicarbonate/lactate exchanges (“NEPP”)]. ♦ Methods: In a prospective crossover study (2 periods of 24 weeks), new continuous ambulatory PD patients were randomized to NEPP–sPD (n = 23) or to sPD–NEPP (n = 27). ♦ Results: After the start of PD, absolute increases were observed in plasma levels of 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG, 220.4 nmol/L, p < 0.0001) and in N(ε)-(carboxymethyl) lysine (CML) in plasma proteins (0.02 μmol/L CML per 1 mol/L lysine, p < 0.0001). During the first 6 weeks, 3-DG tended to increase more with sPD treatment (p = 0.08), and CML, with NEPP treatment (p = 0.002). In both groups, N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine (CEL) in plasma proteins declined significantly with the start of PD. Treatment with NEPP resulted in higher levels of methylglyoxal (MGO) and lower levels of 3-DG and CEL. Pentosidine in the albumin fraction tended to increase less during NEPP treatment. ♦ Conclusions: A low glucose and GDP PD regimen (NEPP) resulted in plasma levels of 3-DG and CEL that were lower than those with a glucose-based sPD regimen. Starting PD with NEPP was associated with a steeper increase in CML, and continuing treatment with NEPP resulted in higher MGO levels

A PERITONEAL DIALYSIS REGIMEN LOW IN GLUCOSE AND GLUCOSE DEGRADATION PRODUCTS RESULTS IN INCREASED CANCER ANTIGEN 125 AND PERITONEAL ACTIVATION

Background: Glucose and glucose degradation products (GDPs) in peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) are both thought to mediate progressive peritoneal worsening. Methods: In a multicenter, prospective, randomized crossover study, incident continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients were treated either with conventional lactate-buffered PDF (sPD regimen) or with a regimen low in glucose and GDPs: Nutrinealx1, Extranealx1, and Physionealx2 (NEPP regimen; all solutions: Baxter Healthcare, Utrecht, Netherlands). After 6 months, patients were switched to the alternative regimen for another 6 months. After 6 weeks of run-in, before the switch, and at the end of the study, 4-hour peritoneal equilibration tests were performed, and overnight effluents were analyzed for cells and biomarkers. Differences between the regimens were assessed by multivariate analysis corrected for time and regimen sequence. Results: The 45 patients who completed the study were equally distributed over both groups. During NEPP treatment, D-4/D-0 glucose was lower (p <0.01) and D/P creatinine was higher (p = 0.04). In NEPP overnight effluent, mesothelial cells (p <0.0001), cancer antigen 125 (p <0.0001), hyaluronan (p <0.0001), leukocytes (p <0.001), interleukins 6 (p = 0.001) and 8 (p = 0.0001), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, p <0.0001) were increased by a factor of 2 - 3 compared with levels in sPD effluent. The NEPP regimen was associated with higher transport parameters, but that association disappeared after the addition of VEGF to the model. The association between NEPP and higher effluent levels of VEGF could not be attributed to glucose and GDP loads. Conclusions: Study results indicate preservation of the mesothelium and increased peritoneal activation during NEPP treatment. Whether the increase in VEGF reflects an increase in mesothelial cell mass or whether it points to another, undesirable mechanism cannot be determined from the present study. Longitudinal studies are needed to finally evaluate the usefulness of the NEPP regimen for further clinical use

Randomized, clinical trial comparison of trisodium citrate 30% and heparin as catheter-locking solution in hemodialysis patients

Interdialytic hemodialysis catheter-locking solutions could contribute to a reduction of catheter-related complications, especially infections. However, they can cause side effects because of leakage from the tip of the catheter. Recently, trisodium citrate (TSC) has been advocated because of its antimicrobial properties and local anticoagulation. In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, TSC 30% was compared with unfractionated heparin 5000 U/ml for prevention of catheter-related infections, thrombosis, and bleeding complications. The study was stopped prematurely because of a difference in catheter-related bacteremia (CRB; P < 0.01). Of 363 eligible patients, 291 could be randomized. The study included 98 tunneled cuffed catheters and 193 untunneled. There were no significant differences in patient and catheter characteristics on inclusion. In the heparin group, 46% of catheters had to be removed because of any complication compared with 28% in the TSC group (P = 0.005). CRB rates were 1.1 per 1000 catheter-days for TSC versus 4.1 in the heparin group (P < 0.001). For tunneled cuffed catheters, the risk reduction for CRB was 87% (P < 0.001) and for untunneled catheters was 64% (P = 0.05). Fewer patients died from CRB in the TSC group (0 versus 5; P = 0.028). There were no differences in catheter flow problems and thrombosis (P = 0.75). No serious adverse events were encountered. Major bleeding episodes were significantly lower in the TSC group (P = 0.010). TSC 30% improves overall patency rates and reduces catheter-related infections and major bleeding episodes for both tunneled and untunneled hemodialysis catheters. Flow problems are not reduced