9 research outputs found

    Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of 5'deoxy-5-fluorouridine in 5-fluorouracil resistant head and neck tumours in relation to 5-fluorouracil metabolising enzymes.

    Get PDF
    Four human head and neck xenograft (HNX) tumour lines grown in nude mice and two murine colon carcinomas (Colon 26 and 38) were tested for their sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its prodrug 5'deoxy-5-fluorouridine (Doxifluridine, 5'd-FUR). 5-FU sensitivity at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) showed the following pattern; HNX-DU less than HNX-KE = HNX-E = HNX-G less than Colon 26 much less than Colon 38. The sensitivity pattern to 5'd-FUR was: HNX-DU less than HNX-G less than HNX-E less than HNX-KE less than Colon 38 less than Colon 26. For HNX-KE, HNX-E and Colon 26 an increase in therapeutic efficacy was observed with 5'd-FUR as compared to 5-FU; Colon 38 was as sensitive to 5'd-FUR as to 5-FU. Plasma pharmacokinetics of 5'd-FUR and 5-FU were comparable in normal and nude mice. Metabolism of 5-FU and 5'd-FUR was studied in the tumours. Conversion of 5'd-FUR to 5-FU was highest in Colon 26 and 15-20 times lower in HNX-DU, HNX-KE and Colon 38. The Km for 5'd-FUR in all tumours was 1-2 mM. Further anabolism of 5-FU to fluorouridine (FUR) was 5-10 times higher than that of 5-FU to FUR in HNX tumours and 3 times in the colon tumours. 5-FU conversion to FUMP via FUR had the following pattern: Colon 26 much greater than HNX-DU greater than HNX-G greater than HNX-E greater than HNX-KE much greater than Colon 38; of 5-FU to FdUMP via FUdR: Colon 26 greater than HNX-DU = HNX-KE greater than HNX-E greater than HNX-G = Colon 38; and that of 5-FU to FUMP catalysed by orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT); Colon 26 greater than or equal to Colon 38 greater than HNX-KE greater than HNX-E = HNX-DU = HNX-G. Only those tumours with a relatively high activity of OPRT were sensitive to 5'd-FUR. Colon 26, which has a very high rate of pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylase, showed a relatively high increase in the therapeutic efficacy. It is concluded that a low rate of pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylase is enough to convert 5'd-FUR to 5-FU; further anabolism of 5-FU catalysed by OPRT may be limiting and explain the differential sensitivity

    Thymidine phosphorylase in cancer cells stimulates human endothelial cell migration and invasion by the secretion of angiogenic factors

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is often overexpressed in tumours and has a role in tumour aggressiveness and angiogenesis. Here, we determined whether TP increased tumour invasion and whether TP-expressing cancer cells stimulated angiogenesis. METHODS: Angiogenesis was studied by exposing endothelial cells (HUVECs) to conditioned medium (CM) derived from cancer cells with high (Colo320TP1 = CT-CM, RT112/TP = RT-CM) and no TP expression after which migration (wound-healing-assay) and invasion (transwell-assay) were determined. The involvement of several angiogenic factors were examined by RT-PCR, ELISA and blocking antibodies. RESULTS: Tumour invasion was not dependent on intrinsic TP expression. The CT-CM and RT-CM stimulated HUVEC-migration and invasion by about 15 and 40%, respectively. Inhibition by 10 mu M TPI and 100 mu M L-dR, blocked migration and reduced the invasion by 50-70%. Thymidine phosphorylase activity in HUVECs was increased by CT-CM. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed a higher mRNA expression of bFGF (Colo320TP1), IL-8 (RT112/TP) and TNF-alpha, but not VEGF. Blocking antibodies targeting these factors decreased the migration and invasion that was induced by the CT-CM and RT-CM, except for IL-8 in CT-CM and bFGF in RT-CM. CONCLUSION: In our cell line panels, TP did not increase the tumour invasion, but stimulated the migration and invasion of HUVECs by two different mechanisms. Hence, TP targeting seems to provide a potential additional strategy in the field of anti-angiogenic therapy
    corecore