3 research outputs found

    Buying Equality: How School Finance Reform and Desegregation Came to Compete in Connecticut

    No full text
    Since its inception, the nationwide movement for school finance reform has been deeply connected with school desegregation. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, advocates of equal educational opportunity who were growing frustrated with the slow progress of school desegregation began to seek out new avenues of reform. Many turned to school finance reform and the goal of equalizing resources as a fresh way to improve the educational opportunities of poor or minority students. Today, as federal district courts around the country declare unitary status in school desegregation cases while battles over school finance continue to rage, it would seem that the shift from school desegregation to school finance litigation is almost complete

    An International, Retrospective Study of Off-Label Biologic Use in the Treatment of Hypereosinophilic Syndromes.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Treatment of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) often requires the use of immunomodulators with substantial side effect profiles. The emergence of biologics offers an alternative treatment modality. OBJECTIVE To examine real world practice data to describe the safety and consequences of various biologics suspected to either directly or indirectly impact eosinophilic inflammation for the treatment of HES. METHODS Retrospective data from 13 centers were collected via an online REDCap data repository. Inclusion criteria included 1) peripheral eosinophil count ≥1500/mm3 without a secondary cause, 2) clinical manifestations attributable to the eosinophilia, and 3) having received mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), benralizumab (afucosylated anti-IL-5 receptor alpha), omalizumab (anti-IgE), alemtuzumab (anti-CD52), dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor alpha), or reslizumab (anti-IL-5) outside of a placebo-controlled clinical trial. RESULTS Of the 151 courses of biologics prescribed for 121 patients with HES, 59% resulted in improved HES symptoms and 77% enabled tapering of other HES medications. Overall, 105 patients were on daily systemic glucocorticoids at the time of a biologic initiation and were able to reduce their glucocorticoid dose by a median reduction of 10 mg of daily prednisone equivalents. Biologics were generally safe and well tolerated other than infusion reactions with alemtuzumab. Thirteen out of 24 patients had clinical improvement after switching biologics, and 9 patients responded to increasing the dose of mepolizumab after lack of response to a lower dose. CONCLUSION Biologics may offer a safer treatment alternative to existing therapies for HES, although the optimal dosing and choice for each subtype of HES remains to be determined. Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and inter-site differences in data collection and availability of each biologic
    corecore