Computer Literacy and Health Locus of Control as Determinants for Readiness and Acceptability of Telepractice in a Head and Neck Cancer Population

Understanding end-user populations is required in designing telepractice applications. This study explored computer literacy and health locus of control in head/neck cancer (HNC) patients to inform suitability for telerehabilitation. Sixty individuals with oropharygneal cancer were recruited. Computer literacy was examined using a 10-question survey. The Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale Form C (MHLC-C) examined perceptions of health “control”.  Participants were mostly middle-aged males, from high socioeconomic backgrounds. Only 10% were non-computer users. Of the computers users, 91% reported daily use, 66% used multiple devices and over 75% rated themselves as “confident” users. More than half were open to using technology for health-related activities. High internal scores (MHLC-C) signified a belief that own behaviour influenced health status.  HNC patients have high computer literacy and an internal health locus of control, both are positive factors to support telepractice models of care. This may include asynchronous models requiring heightened capacity for self-management

Physiological changes to the swallowing mechanism following (Chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Emerging research suggests that preventative swallowing rehabilitation, undertaken before or during (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT), can significantly improve early swallowing outcomes for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. However, these treatment protocols are highly variable. Determining specific physiological swallowing parameters that are most likely to be impacted post-(C)RT would assist in refining clear targets for preventative rehabilitation. Therefore, this systematic review (1) examined the frequency and prevalence of physiological swallowing deficits observed post-(C)RT for HNC, and (2) determined the patterns of prevalence of these key physiological deficits over time post-treatment. Online databases were searched for relevant papers published between January 1998 and March 2013. A total of 153 papers were identified and appraised for methodological quality and suitability based on exclusionary criteria. Ultimately, 19 publications met the study’s inclusion criteria. Collation of reported prevalence of physiological swallowing deficits revealed reduced laryngeal excursion, base-of-tongue (BOT) dysfunction, reduced pharyngeal contraction, and impaired epiglottic movement as most frequently reported. BOT dysfunction and impaired epiglottic movement showed a collective prevalence of over 75 % in the majority of patient cohorts, whilst reduced laryngeal elevation and pharyngeal contraction had a prevalence of over 50 %. Subanalysis suggested a trend that the prevalence of these key deficits is dynamic although persistent over time. These findings can be used by clinicians to inform preventative intervention and support the use of specific, evidence-based therapy tasks explicitly selected to target the highly prevalent deficits post-(C)RT for HNC

Dysphagia optimized radiotherapy to reduce swallowing dysfunction severity in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer: a systematized scoping review

This study involved a systematized scoping review to coalesce current evidence on dysphagia outcomes achieved through active sparing of the swallowing structures in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Eligible publications between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed and synthesized regarding participant demographics, treatment regimens, swallowing structures chosen for optimization, dosimetric constraints, and dysphagia measures. Nine prospective cohort studies were included. Key structures routinely spared included pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCMs), glottic larynx (GL), supraglottic larynx (SGL), and esophageal inlet muscle. Shorter enteral feeding times and reductions in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) grade 3 dysphagia toxicity were observed when dose to the larynx (GL and SGL) and PCMs was constrained t

Exploring the prevalence and experience of mask anxiety for the person with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy

Introduction: While use of a thermoplastic mask during radiotherapy (RT) treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) is an essential component of safe patient care, there is little understanding of the extent to which this evokes anxiety (i.e. “mask anxiety”) for the person undergoing treatment. Methods: A mixed method, convergent design was used to examine the prevalence and experience of mask anxiety using two clinical cohorts. In phase one, a cohort of 100 patients undergoing RT for HNC were assessed for self-perceived mask anxiety using a modified distress thermometer screening tool. In phase two, a separate cohort of 20 patients who identified as having mask anxiety participated in individual interpretative descriptive interviews to explore the nature of their experience. Results: In phase one, 26% of participants self-identified as being anxious about the use of a thermoplastic mask. In phase two thematic analysis of the interviews revealed two over-arching themes relating to the person's experience of mask anxiety: contributors to the mask anxiety (vulnerability, response to experience and expectations); and how the person was going to manage the mask anxiety during treatment (strategies and mindset). Conclusions: Mask anxiety impacted a quarter of participants undergoing radiotherapy for HNC. In line with the themes elicited from the participants, implementation of routine screening to ensure early identification, and patient education to assist preparation for wearing the mask during RT are strategies that could improve current management of mask anxiety

Application of telepractice for head and neck cancer management: a review of speech language pathology service models

Purpose of revie

Adherence to a prophylactic swallowing therapy program during (chemo) radiotherapy: impact of service-delivery model and patient factors

Intensive, prophylactic swallowing therapy programs have been developed to improve dysphagia outcomes for patients with head/neck cancer (HNC) receiving (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT). Across studies, variable therapy adherence rates have been reported. Preliminary research suggests that service-delivery mode and demographic factors may influence adherence. This study examined patient adherence to a prophylactic swallowing therapy protocol across three service-delivery models: (1) clinician-directed face-to-face therapy, (2) technology-assisted therapy using the telepractice application, SwallowIT and (3) independent patient-directed therapy. The secondary aim explored the impact of patient factors on adherence. Patients with oropharyngeal HNC receiving definitive (C)RT were randomised to receive the Pharyngocise exercise protocol via clinician-directed (n = 26), patient-directed (n = 27) or SwallowIT-assisted (n = 26) models. Adherence was calculated as the percentage of prescribed exercise completed. Multiple patient factors were recorded at baseline. Adherence across the 6 weeks in all groups was low (27%), and declined from week 4 of (C)RT. The clinician-directed model yielded significantly (p = 0.014) better adherence than patient-directed therapy in weeks 1-3. There was also a trend for higher adherence in the SwallowIT group compared to patient-directed in weeks 1-3 (p = 0.064). Multivariable linear modelling identified active smoking at baseline (p < 0.001) and concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.040) as significant negative predictors of adherence, with baseline reduced motivation trending towards significance. Although (C)RT-related toxicities will impact adherence, adopting service-delivery models with greater structure/support and providing extra assistance to patients with known risk factors may help optimise therapy adherence to prophylactic therapy programs. Telepractice may provide an alternate model to support adherence where service constraints limit intensive clinician-directed therapy

Practices, knowledge and inter‐professional relationships between speech pathologists and radiation therapists managing patients with head and neck cancer

This study examined knowledge and practices of speech pathologists (SPs) and radiation therapists (RTs) regarding plan optimisation for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, and the potential impacts on swallowing function. The secondary aim was to explore the level of interaction occurring between these professional groups within cancer centres.Two electronic surveys, with matched questions for SPs and RTs, explored: service/institutional demographics; clinician awareness, practices regarding plan optimisation to swallowing structures and; relationships and interactions between SPs and RTs in the management of HNC patients. Participant recruitment occurred through specialist professional networks with additional snowball sampling. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.A total of 32 SPs and 41 RTs completed surveys. All SPs and 50% of RTs were aware of dose-dysphagia relationships, though SPs rarely used dosimetric information to inform patient management. Only 33% of RTs indicated that their centres actively constrain dose to swallowing structures, reporting that staffing skill mixtures and lack of prescription by the treating RO were restrictive factors. Both SPs and RTs acknowledged the importance of collaborating with colleagues (SPs/RTs) and felt they could assist their colleagues in devising patient management plans, though current collaboration/interaction was minimal.Levels of awareness were found to be higher in SP group. Despite high levels of awareness, limited use of swallowing structure dose constraints and hence dosimetric information specific to swallowing was rarely used to optimise/guide multidisciplinary HNC acute care. Opportunities for enhanced collaboration between SPs and RTs should be considered

Research engagement and activity in an allied health workforce insights into departmental and organisational strategies

Clinical environments that support and encourage research assist the development of research capacity and engagement amongst staff. Unfortunately, little information exists regarding departmental- and organisational-level strategies being used to encourage research capacity building within the allied health (AH) workforce. The current study used a qualitative approach to examine the nature of research engagement and activity occurring across AH departments within a large Australian public hospital and health service.Twenty-two AH departments from five sites/services provided details on research capacity building activities within their departments. Responses were aggregated and then examined thematically using an inductive approach. The number of departments reporting content against each theme category or subcategory was analysed descriptively.A culture of research engagement was identified in over 90% of departments, with over 80% producing research outputs. Content analysis identified key strategies being used to (a) stimulate active staff engagement with with/in research, (b) support research activity, and (c) conduct research within networks and partnerships.AH departments in the current study engaged in multiple strategies to help build the research capacity of their staff. The findings highlight structures, processes, and systems that can be employed by departments at an organisational level to help support AH research capacity building

Experiences of communication changes following spinal cord injury: a qualitative analysis

Voice and communication changes can occur following cervical spinal cord injury due to dysfunction of the respiratory and phonatory subsystems. Few studies have explored the "lived experience" of communication changes post cervical spinal cord injury. Furthermore, the impacts of these changes on community activity/participation and requirements for psychosocial adjustment have not been well-elucidated. The current study explored the experience of communication changes in non-ventilated individuals following cervical spinal cord injury, using a biopsychosocial framework.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 community-dwelling non-ventilated individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an inductive approach. Themes were subsequently coded against domains of the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health model, using established linking rules.Four main themes were identified: (1) how communication has changed; (2) difficulties getting the message across, (3) the multifactorial impact of communication changes on everyday life; and (4) strategies/support to adjust to communication changes. Communication changes had multifaceted effects on participants' functioning, and were represented equally across the Body Functions (12 codes), Activities/Participation (12 codes), and Environmental Factors (11 codes) domains of the model.Individuals with cervical spinal cord injury perceive and experience meaningful changes on communication function post-injury, with salient impacts to daily-living and social participation. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION As a result of communication changes post-injury, individuals with cervical spinal cord injury experience several challenges across a variety of domains in daily life The current study highlights the benefit of using a biopsychosocial framework, such as The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), to consider the complex and diverse impact of communication changes on the functioning of individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, as well as the influence of environmental factors, on rehabilitation planning The current data demonstrates the need for increased involvement of speech-language pathologists as core members of the multidisciplinary team, and for acute awareness by all health professionals of the potential impact of communication changes on rehabilitation and psychosocial adjustment in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury