Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

Functional Differences Between EBV- and CMV-Specific CD8+ T cells Demonstrate Heterogeneity of T cell Dysfunction in CLL

Abstract. Acquired T cell dysfunction is a hallmark of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and is linked to an increased risk of infections, but also reduced immune surveillance and disappointing responses to autologous T cell-based immunotherapy. The mechanisms of T cell dysfunction in CLL are not well understood. Studying immunity against chronic viruses allows for detailed analysis of the effect of CLL on T cells chronically exposed to a specific antigen. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations are rare in CLL, which corroborates with preserved CMV-specific T cell function. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is another herpesvirus that results in chronic infection, but unlike CMV, is characterized by subclinical reactivations in CLL patients. Since both herpesviruses induce strong CD8+ T cell responses, but have different clinical outcomes, studying these specific T cells may shed light on the mechanisms of CLL-induced T cell dysfunction. We first analyzed the phenotype of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells in CLL and healthy controls, and found that in CLL EBV-specific CD8+ T cells are in an advanced differentiation state with higher expression of inhibitory receptors. Secondly, CLL-derived EBV-specific CD8+ T cells show reduced cytotoxic potential, in contrast to CMV-specific T cells. Finally, we performed transcriptome analysis to visualize differential modulation by CLL of these T cell subsets. While T cell activation and differentiation genes are unaffected, in EBV-specific T cells expression of genes involved in synapse formation and T cell exhaustion is altered. Our findings on the heterogeneity of antigen specific T cell function in CLL aids in understanding immune-dysregulation in this disease