43 research outputs found

    Controversies in antimicrobial therapy: Innovative methods of administration

    Full text link

    Prophylaxis with Aztreonam Plus Metronidazole During Appendectomy

    Full text link

    Bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics

    Full text link

    An Update on the arsenal for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infections: Polymyxin antibiotics

    Get PDF
    Objective: To review recent clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to optimize dosing regimens for polymyxin B and colistin for treatment of infections due to A. baumannii. Methods: A literature search was performed using the search terms Acinetobacter, polymyxin, colistin, polymyxin B on MEDLINE. Additional references were identified from the resulting citations. Results: Increasing the dose of polymyxin B or colistin and using either in combination with other antibiotic agents demonstrates improved antimicrobial activity against Acinetobacter spp. Polymyxin B, unlike colistin, is available as an active drug and appears to be relatively unaffected by renal function. This is advantageous both for patients with renal impairment and for those with intact renal function. Achieving therapeutic serum concentrations of colistin may be difficult for those with intact renal function due to rapid clearance of the prodrug, colistimethate sodium (CMS). Clinical data are still lacking for polymyxin B, and it remains to be seen whether advantages demonstrated in PK/PD analyses will persist in the larger scale of patient care and safety. Conclusions: The use of higher doses of either colistin or polymyxin B, as well as combination with other antibiotics, may prevent emerging resistance and preserve the activity of polymyxins against A. baumannii

    Steady-State Plasma and Bronchopulmonary Concentrations of Intravenous Levofloxacin and Azithromycin in Healthy Adults

    Full text link
    The purpose of this study was to compare the concentrations of levofloxacin and azithromycin in steady-state plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) after intravenous administration. Thirty-six healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects were randomized to either intravenous levofloxacin (500 or 750 mg) or azithromycin (500 mg) once daily for five doses. Venipuncture and bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage were performed in each subject at either 4, 12, or 24 h after the start of the last antibiotic infusion. The mean concentrations of levofloxacin and azithromycin in plasma were similar to those previously published. The dosing regimens of levofloxacin achieved significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations in steady-state plasma than azithromycin during the 24 h after drug administration. The respective mean (± standard deviation) concentrations at 4, 12, and 24 h in ELF for 500 mg of levofloxacin were 11.01 ± 4.52, 2.50 ± 0.97, and 1.24 ± 0.55 μg/ml; those for 750 mg of levofloxacin were 12.94 ± 1.21, 6.04 ± 0.39, and 1.73 ± 0.78 μg/ml; and those for azithromycin were 1.70 ± 0.74, 1.27 ± 0.47, and 2.86 ± 1.75 μg/ml. The differences in concentrations in ELF among the two levofloxacin groups and azithromycin were significantly (P < 0.05) higher at the 4- and 12-h sampling times. The respective concentrations in AM for 500 mg of levofloxacin were 83.9 ± 53.2, 18.3 ± 6.7, and 5.6 ± 3.2 μg/ml; those for 750 mg of levofloxacin were 81.7 ± 37.0, 78.2 ± 55.4, and 13.3 ± 6.5 μg/ml; and those for azithromycin were 650 ± 259, 669 ± 311, and 734 ± 770 μg/ml. Azithromycin achieved significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations in AM than levofloxacin at all sampling times. The concentrations in ELF and AM following intravenous administration of levofloxacin and azithromycin were higher than concentrations in plasma. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of such high intrapulmonary concentrations in patients with respiratory tract infections

    Efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin in the management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

    Full text link
    Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE), a historically under-recognized chronic respiratory condition, is a significant diagnosis currently experiencing a resurgence of interest in its clinical management. Ciprofloxacin is part of the current armamentarium used in the treatment of the recurrent respiratory tract infections seen in NCFBE. Inhaled ciprofloxacin, a novel method of drug delivery for the fluoroquinolone class, is being actively investigated. The inhaled formulation is designed to enhance drug delivery to the site of infection in the lung while minimizing the risk of systemic toxicity. This review summarizes the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin and the rationale for the development of an inhaled formulation for NCFBE. Preclinical and clinical data regarding current development of inhaled ciprofloxacin formulations is also evaluated. Lastly, the anticipated role of inhaled ciprofloxacin in the management of NCFBE is discussed, including future considerations and potential limitations of therapy

    Warfarin-induced skin necrosis: report of four cases

    Full text link

    Antibiotic-impregnated cement use in U.S. hospitals

    Full text link

    In Vitro Bactericidal Activities of ABT-773 against ermB Strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae

    Full text link
    The bactericidal activities of ABT-773, a new ketolide, were compared to those of cefuroxime and amoxicillin-clavulanate against 10 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae containing the ermB gene. MICs and time-kill curves were determined in duplicate per NCCLS guidelines with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 3% lysed horse blood. Viable counts were done at 0, 2, 6, and 24 h. Antibiotic concentrations tested were two and eight times the MIC. ABT-773 MICs ranged from 0.008 to 1.0 μg/ml. Bactericidal activity was observed with ABT-773 at eight times the MIC against 4 of 10 strains at 24 h compared to 10 of 10 strains with the beta-lactam antibiotics

    In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Activities of ABT-492, a Novel Quinolone, Compared to Those of Levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis

    Full text link
    ABT-492 is a novel quinolone with potent activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and atypical pathogens, making this compound an ideal candidate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. We therefore compared the in vitro pharmacodynamic activity of ABT-492 to that of levofloxacin, an antibiotic commonly used for the treatment of pneumonia, through MIC determination and time-kill kinetic analysis. ABT-492 demonstrated potent activity against penicillin-sensitive, penicillin-resistant, and levofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains (MICs ranging from 0.0078 to 0.125 μg/ml); β-lactamase-positive and β-lactamase-negative Haemophilus influenzae strains (MICs ranging from 0.000313 to 0.00125 μg/ml); and β-lactamase-positive and β-lactamase-negative Moraxella catarrhalis strains (MICs ranging from 0.001 to 0.0025 μg/ml), with MICs being much lower than those of levofloxacin. Both ABT-492 and levofloxacin demonstrated concentration-dependent bactericidal activities in time-kill kinetics studies at four and eight times the MIC with 10 of 12 bacterial isolates exposed to ABT-492 and with 12 of 12 bacterial isolates exposed to levofloxacin. Sigmoidal maximal-effect models support concentration-dependent bactericidal activity. The model predicts that 50% of maximal activity can be achieved with concentrations ranging from one to two times the MIC for both ABT-492 and levofloxacin and that near-maximal activity (90% effective concentration) can be achieved at concentrations ranging from two to five times the MIC for ABT-492 and one to six times the MIC for levofloxacin
    corecore