Tachyphylaxis and reproducibility of desmopressin response in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A:implications for clinical practice

Background: Desmopressin is frequently used perioperatively in persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. However, increase in factor (F)VIII:C after desmopressin use is interindividually highly variable. Tachyphylaxis has only been reported in test setting for persons with hemophilia A, with a remaining response of approximately 70% after a second dose compared with that after a first dose.Objectives:To study tachyphylaxis of FVIII:C response after multiple administration(s) of desmopressin in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. Methods: We studied FVIII:C levels after desmopressin before (day 0 [D0]) and on days 1 (D1) and 2 (D2) after surgery in 26 patients of the DAVID and Little DAVID studies. We studied tachyphylaxis by comparing the responses at D1 and D2 with that at D0. We also assessed the reproducibility of the D0 response in comparison to an earlier performed desmopressin test. Results: The median absolute FVIII:C increase was 0.50 IU/mL (0.35-0.74; n = 23) at D0, 0.21 IU/mL (0.14-0.28; n = 17) at D1, and 0.23 IU/mL (0.16-0.30; n = 11) at D2. The median percentage of FVIII increase after the second administration (D1) compared with the first (D0) was 42.9% (29.2%-52.5%; n = 17) and that of the third (D2) compared with the first (D0) was 36.4% (23.7%-46.9%; n = 11). The FVIII:C desmopressin response at D0 was comparable with the desmopressin test response in 74% of the patients. Conclusion: Tachyphylaxis in the surgical setting was considerably more pronounced than previously reported, with FVIII:C at D1 and D2 of 36% to 43% of the initial response. Our results may have important implications for monitoring repeated desmopressin treatment when used perioperatively.</p

Tachyphylaxis and reproducibility of desmopressin response in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A: implications for clinical practice

Background: Desmopressin is frequently used perioperatively in persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. However, increase in factor (F)VIII:C after desmopressin use is interindividually highly variable. Tachyphylaxis has only been reported in test setting for persons with hemophilia A, with a remaining response of approximately 70% after a second dose compared with that after a first dose. Objectives: To study tachyphylaxis of FVIII:C response after multiple administration(s) of desmopressin in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. Methods: We studied FVIII:C levels after desmopressin before (day 0 [D0]) and on days 1 (D1) and 2 (D2) after surgery in 26 patients of the DAVID and Little DAVID studies. We studied tachyphylaxis by comparing the responses at D1 and D2 with that at D0. We also assessed the reproducibility of the D0 response in comparison to an earlier performed desmopressin test. Results: The median absolute FVIII:C increase was 0.50 IU/mL (0.35-0.74; n = 23) at D0, 0.21 IU/mL (0.14-0.28; n = 17) at D1, and 0.23 IU/mL (0.16-0.30; n = 11) at D2. The median percentage of FVIII increase after the second administration (D1) compared with the first (D0) was 42.9% (29.2%-52.5%; n = 17) and that of the third (D2) compared with the first (D0) was 36.4% (23.7%-46.9%; n = 11). The FVIII:C desmopressin response at D0 was comparable with the desmopressin test response in 74% of the patients. Conclusion: Tachyphylaxis in the surgical setting was considerably more pronounced than previously reported, with FVIII:C at D1 and D2 of 36% to 43% of the initial response. Our results may have important implications for monitoring repeated desmopressin treatment when used perioperatively

Tachyphylaxis and reproducibility of desmopressin response in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A:implications for clinical practice

Background: Desmopressin is frequently used perioperatively in persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. However, increase in factor (F)VIII:C after desmopressin use is interindividually highly variable. Tachyphylaxis has only been reported in test setting for persons with hemophilia A, with a remaining response of approximately 70% after a second dose compared with that after a first dose.Objectives:To study tachyphylaxis of FVIII:C response after multiple administration(s) of desmopressin in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. Methods: We studied FVIII:C levels after desmopressin before (day 0 [D0]) and on days 1 (D1) and 2 (D2) after surgery in 26 patients of the DAVID and Little DAVID studies. We studied tachyphylaxis by comparing the responses at D1 and D2 with that at D0. We also assessed the reproducibility of the D0 response in comparison to an earlier performed desmopressin test. Results: The median absolute FVIII:C increase was 0.50 IU/mL (0.35-0.74; n = 23) at D0, 0.21 IU/mL (0.14-0.28; n = 17) at D1, and 0.23 IU/mL (0.16-0.30; n = 11) at D2. The median percentage of FVIII increase after the second administration (D1) compared with the first (D0) was 42.9% (29.2%-52.5%; n = 17) and that of the third (D2) compared with the first (D0) was 36.4% (23.7%-46.9%; n = 11). The FVIII:C desmopressin response at D0 was comparable with the desmopressin test response in 74% of the patients. Conclusion: Tachyphylaxis in the surgical setting was considerably more pronounced than previously reported, with FVIII:C at D1 and D2 of 36% to 43% of the initial response. Our results may have important implications for monitoring repeated desmopressin treatment when used perioperatively.</p

von Willebrand factor propeptide and the phenotypic classification of von Willebrand disease

UNLABELLED: The ratios between von Willebrand factor propeptide (VWFpp) or factor VIII activity (\n\nFVIII: C) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) reflect synthesis, secretion, and clearance of VWF. We aimed to define the pathophysiology of 658 patients with type 1, 2, or 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) with VWF levels ≤30 U/dL from the Willebrand in The Netherlands (WiN) study using the VWFpp/VWF:Ag and\n\nFVIII: C/VWF:Ag ratios. We evaluated the use of VWFpp in the classification and diagnosis of VWD. On the basis of the ratios, reduced VWF synthesis was observed in 18% of type 1 and only 2% of type 2 patients. A significant proportion of type 3 patients had detectable VWFpp (41%). These patients had a lower bleeding score than type 3 patients who had a complete absence of VWF:Ag and VWFpp (14.0 vs 19.5; P = .025). The majority of these patients had missense mutations with rapid VWF clearance, whereas type 3 patients with no VWFpp were homozygous for null alleles. In conclusion, VWFpp identified severe type 1 VWD with very low VWF levels in patients who had previously been classified as type 3 VWD. This study underlines the clinical significance of the VWFpp assay in the diagnosis and classification of VWD

Von Willebrand disease and aging: An evolving phenotype

BACKGROUND: Because the number of elderly von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients is increasing, the pathophysiology of aging in VWD has become increasingly relevant. OBJECTIVES: To assess age-related changes in von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) levels and to compare age-related differences in bleeding phenotype between elderly VWD patients and those <65 years. We also studied co-morbidity in elderly patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: We included VWD patients with VWF levels ≤ 30 U dL(-1) in the nationwide cross-sectional 'Willebrand in the Netherlands' (WiN-) study. Patients reported bleeding episodes and treatment of VWD in the year preceding inclusion and during life. This was compared between VWD patients older (n = 71) and younger (16-64 years, n = 593) than 65 years. In elderly patients, age-related changes in VWF and FVIII levels were studied longitudinally by including all historically measured levels. All medical records were examined for co-morbidity. RESULTS: In elderly type 1 patients, a decade age increase was associated with a 3.5 U dL(-1) (95% CI, -0.6 to 7.6) VWF:Ag increase and 7.1 U dL(-1) (95% CI, 0.7 to 13.4) FVIII:C increase. This increase was not observed in elderly type 2 patients. Elderly type 2 patients reported significantly more bleeding symptoms in the year preceding inclusion than younger patients (16/27, 59% vs. 87/221, 39%; P = 0.048), which was not observed in type 1 VWD. CONCLUSIONS: von Willebrand factor parameters and bleeding phenotype evolve with increasing age in VWD. VWF and FVIII levels increase with age in type 1 patients with no mitigation in bleeding phenotype. In type 2 patients VWF parameters do not increase with age and in these patients aging is accompanied by increased bleeding