The Philebus, a protreptic?

The objective of this article is threefold: to demonstrate that the Philebus has a protreptic aim; to illustrate how this dialogue can help to refine our understanding of protreptic as a literary genre; and to define the specific character of the Philebus as a work of philosophical protreptic in light of the work's political and "cosmic" significance

Being and time and the ancient philosophical tradition of care for the self: A tense or harmonious relationship?

This text seeks to situate Being and Time in the line of the ancient philosophical tradition of care for self (epiméleia heautou). After a brief description of the main features of this tradition as portrayed by Michel Foucault and Pierre Hadot, the author presents the elements of Being in Time in favour and those against such a link. Her hypothesis appears to encounter a major objection in the explicit refusal of Heidegger to speak of Selbstsorge. But an attentive examination of the meaning of this reserve (the rejection of selfhood as a transparent and introspective relationship of the soul to itself) makes it in reality possible to show Heidegger to be one of the most consequent philosophers in the tradition of care for the soul. Indeed, by highlighting the constitutive link between selfhood and care, Heidegger shows the very condition of possibility of the tradition of care for the soul: that the self is not given as a thing, but may contribute to its own transformation through a specific form of care