3 research outputs found

    Assessing Cancer Risk Associated with Aquatic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pollution Reveals Dietary Routes of Exposure and Vulnerable Populations

    No full text
    Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure is widespread, and many PAHs are considered carcinogenic. The PAH-contaminated AWI Superfund site in Virginia provides a model for studying a complex PAH mixture and its extrapolation to cancer risk and PAH exposure in the general population. We examined cancer risk at the Superfund site due to sediment-derived PAHs and then evaluated PAH sources in the general population and potentially vulnerable subpopulations upon PAH mixture exposure. The PAH mixture was assessed for potential carcinogenicity using the US EPA’s OncoLogic™ ranking tool and the US EPA list of priority PAHs. Cancer risk due to PAH exposure was calculated for Superfund site users and compared to the US EPA assessment. Human intake and health endpoints of PAHs within the mixture were extracted from USEtox® chemical fate database, while mean intake exposure was calculated for U.S. adults for select PAHs using NHANES database urinary biomarkers. Eleven PAH compounds within the mixture were of carcinogenic concern, and seven PAHs conveyed significant excess cancer risk at the Superfund site and in the general population, wherein PAH-contaminated seafood ingestion was a main contributor. Other dietary sources of PAHs derived from PAH-contaminated soil or water could also play a role in total exposure. Vulnerable populations to PAH exposure and coinciding increased cancer risk may include, in addition to smokers, children and non-Hispanic blacks, which is a public health concern

    Cumulative environmental quality is associated with breast cancer incidence differentially by summary stage and urbanicity

    No full text
    Abstract Individual environmental contaminants have been associated with breast cancer; however, evaluations of multiple exposures simultaneously are limited. Herein, we evaluated associations between breast cancer summary stages and the Environmental Quality Index (EQI), which includes a range of environmental factors across five domains. The EQI (2000–2005) was linked to county-level age-standardized incidence rates (SIRs) obtained from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (2010–2014). Incidence rates and SIRs of total, in situ, localized, regional, and distant breast cancers were evaluated stratified by rural–urban status. In counties with poor environmental quality compared to those with good environmental quality, total breast cancer incidence was higher by 10.82 cases per 100,000 persons (95% CI 2.04, 19.60, p = 0.02). This association was most pronounced for localized breast cancer (β = 5.59, 95% CI 0.59, 10.58, p = 0.03). Higher incidence of early-stage disease (carcinoma in situ β = 5.25, 95% CI 2.34, 8.16, p = 0.00 and localized breast cancer β = 6.98, 95% CI 2.24, 11.73, p = 0.00) and total breast cancer (β = 11.44, 95% CI 3.01, 19.87, p = 0.01) occurred in counties with poor land quality, especially urban counties. Our analyses indicate significant associations between environmental quality and breast cancer incidence, which differ by breast cancer stage and urbanicity, identifying a critical need to assess cumulative environmental exposures in the context of cancer stage
    corecore