4 research outputs found

    Deceleration area and fetal acidemia

    Get PDF
    Aims: To compare the predictive ability for neonatal acidemia of individual components of intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) described by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) system and deceleration area. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Spanish tertiary obstetrical hospital. Population: CTG patterns of 102 acidemic fetus (umbilical arterial cord gas pH =7.10, base deficit (BD>48) and 102 nonacidemic controls (umbilical arterial cord gas pH>7.10). Methods: Two reviewers blind to clinical and outcome data analyzed the last thirty minutes before delivery of 204 fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings, extracting those features defined by NICHD and certain measures of FHR decelerations, including deceleration area, not considered by this system. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the predictive ability of NICHD features and non-NICHD deceleration measures for fetal acidemia. The secondary outcome was the impact of deceleration area in the last 30 min of labor on gasometry components (pH, BD and lactate). Results: Minimal variability (area under the curve (AUC) 0.74), total number of late (AUC: 0.75) and prolonged decelerations (0.77) were the three NICHD features with the greatest predictive ability for fetal acidemia in the last thirty minutes of labor. Total deceleration area demonstrated the highest discrimination power (AUC: 0.83) of all the analyzed elements. For each cm2 the area increases in the last 30 min of labor, pH decreases 0.08 units, BD increases 0.272 mEq/L and lactate 0.183 mEq/L. Conclusions: Total deceleration area showed the greatest predictive ability for fetal acidemia and its measure could help to estimate intrapartum fetal acid-base status

    Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?

    Get PDF
    Introduction: We analysed the efficacy and safety of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean section and which were the most important variables associated with an increased risk of repeated cesarean delivery. Materials and methods: We designed an observational retrospective study of 418 women with unfavourable cervices (Bishop Score <5), a prior cesarean delivery, and induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter. Baseline maternal data and perinatal outcomes were recorded for a descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Most women improved their initial Bishop Score (89.5%) although only a 20.8% of them went into spontaneous active labour. Finally, 51.4% of the women achieved a vaginal delivery. Five cases of intrapartum uterine rupture (1.2%) occurred. After multivariate analysis, main risk factors for repeated cesarean section were dystocia in the previous pregnancy (OR 1.744; CI 95% 1.066–2.846), the absence of previous vaginal delivery (OR 2.590; CI 95% 1.066–6.290), suspected fetal macrosomia (OR 2.410; CI 95% 0.959–6.054), and duration of oxytocin induction period (OR 1.005; CI 95% 1.004–1.006). The area under the curve was 0.789 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Double-balloon catheter seems to be safe and effective for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean delivery and unfavourable cervix. In our study, most women could have a vaginal delivery in spite of their risk factors for cesarean delivery. A multivariate model based on some clinical variables has moderate predictive value for intrapartum cesarean section

    Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: We analysed the efficacy and safety of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean section and which were the most important variables associated with an increased risk of repeated cesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed an observational retrospective study of 418 women with unfavourable cervices (Bishop Score <5), a prior cesarean delivery, and induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter. Baseline maternal data and perinatal outcomes were recorded for a descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Most women improved their initial Bishop Score (89.5%) although only a 20.8% of them went into spontaneous active labour. Finally, 51.4% of the women achieved a vaginal delivery. Five cases of intrapartum uterine rupture (1.2%) occurred. After multivariate analysis, main risk factors for repeated cesarean section were dystocia in the previous pregnancy (OR 1.744; CI 95% 1.066–2.846), the absence of previous vaginal delivery (OR 2.590; CI 95% 1.066–6.290), suspected fetal macrosomia (OR 2.410; CI 95% 0.959–6.054), and duration of oxytocin induction period (OR 1.005; CI 95% 1.004–1.006). The area under the curve was 0.789 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Double-balloon catheter seems to be safe and effective for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean delivery and unfavourable cervix. In our study, most women could have a vaginal delivery in spite of their risk factors for cesarean delivery. A multivariate model based on some clinical variables has moderate predictive value for intrapartum cesarean section
    corecore