4 research outputs found

    Finger Systolic Blood Pressure Index Measurement: A Useful Tool for the Evaluation of Arterial Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

    No full text
    International audienceObjective: To evaluate the prevalence and clinical correlates of peripheral arterial disease of the upper limbs in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), as detected with finger brachial pressure index (FBPI) measurements.Methods: This work is based on the baseline data of the SCLEROCAP multicenter cohort of SSc patients. Finger systolic blood pressure was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry, and the FBPI was obtained as its ratio over the ipsilateral brachial systolic blood pressure. An FBPI of <0.70 was used as the diagnostic criterion for occlusive arterial disease of the upper limbs. Thus, the prevalence of defined arterial disease as well as its clinical, biologic, and capillaroscopic correlates were evaluated.Results: Among 326 enrolled patients, 177 (54.3%) met the criterion for arterial disease (FBPI <0.70). No association was found with the type of SSc nor with the type of associated antinuclear antibodies, but a significant association was found with the duration of the disease (P < 0.001), the capillaroscopic pattern (P < 0.001), and most strikingly with the presence of digital ulcers (42.9% versus 13.4%; P < 0.001). A quantitative relationship was found between the FBPI and the prevalence of digital ulcers and was shown to be independent from the capillaroscopic pattern.Conclusion: This cross-sectional study shows a high prevalence of arterial disease of the upper limbs in patients with SSc. FBPI appears to be a strong and independent predictor of digital ulcers. This study suggests that both macro- and microangiopathy are contributing to the ischemic damage of the fingertips

    Correlation of nailfold capillaroscopy findings with history of digital ulcer on same finger: Results of SCLEROCAP study

    No full text
    International audienceSystemic sclerosis may be complicated by digital ulcers. Nailfold capillaroscopy on one finger might reflect an increased risk of digital ulcer (DU). In the present study we studied the correlations between a history of ulcer and capillary findings on the finger.Method: This study is part of Sclerocap, a multicenter study aiming at validating prospectively the prognostic value of Maricq's and Cutolo's capillaroscopic classifications during a three-year longitudinal follow-up. A history of past or present digital ulcer was recorded at inclusion and nailfold capillaroscopy was performed. Elementary findings as well as Cutolo and Maricq's classifications were assessed.Results: 387 patients were included in Sclerocap (327 females, 60 males) and 3096 fingers were examined by capillaroscopy at inclusion: 316 fingers (10%) belonging to 113 patients had a history of DU. Late Cutolo's stage was statistically correlated with a history of DU, both by univariate: OR 2.08 [1.09-3.96] and multivariate analysis: OR 1.97 [1.06-3.63]. Among the elemental abnormalities, only edema and decreased capillary density were correlated with a history of DU by multivariate analysis: respectively OR 1.92 [1.17-3.16] and 0.65 [0.49-0.85].Conclusion: This cross-sectional study in a large cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis shows a correlation between a history of digital ulcer and edema, a decrease in capillary density and the late stage in Cutolo's classification. The extent of capillary abnormalities on one finger is associated with a history of local digital ulcer. Capillaroscopy might be used to predict the risk of DU but these results need first to be confirmed by prospective studies

    Triaging acute pulmonary embolism for home treatment by Hestia or simplified PESI criteria: the HOME-PE randomized trial

    No full text
    AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the Hestia rule vs. the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) for triaging patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) for home treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Normotensive patients with PE of 26 hospitals from France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland were randomized to either triaging with Hestia or sPESI. They were designated for home treatment if the triaging tool was negative and if the physician-in-charge, taking into account the patient's opinion, did not consider that hospitalization was required. The main outcomes were the 30-day composite of recurrent venous thrombo-embolism, major bleeding or all-cause death (non-inferiority analysis with 2.5% absolute risk difference as margin), and the rate of patients discharged home within 24 h after randomization (NCT02811237). From January 2017 through July 2019, 1975 patients were included. In the per-protocol population, the primary outcome occurred in 3.82% (34/891) in the Hestia arm and 3.57% (32/896) in the sPESI arm (P = 0.004 for non-inferiority). In the intention-to-treat population, 38.4% of the Hestia patients (378/984) were treated at home vs. 36.6% (361/986) of the sPESI patients (P = 0.41 for superiority), with a 30-day composite outcome rate of 1.33% (5/375) and 1.11% (4/359), respectively. No recurrent or fatal PE occurred in either home treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: For triaging PE patients, the strategy based on the Hestia rule and the strategy based on sPESI had similar safety and effectiveness. With either tool complemented by the overruling of the physician-in-charge, more than a third of patients were treated at home with a low incidence of complications
    corecore