The effect of acute equine temporomandibular joint inflammation on response to rein-tension and kinematics

BackgroundAlthough the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is the major contact point between the reins in the riders’ hand, the bit in the mouth, and the rest of the horse under saddle, the role of inflammation of this joint on equine locomotion and rein tension is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the effect of acute TMJ inflammation on rein-tension and horse movement when horses were long-reined on a treadmill.Study designA randomized, controlled, cross-over design.MethodsFive horses were trained by one clinician to walk and trot on a treadmill wearing long-reining equipment instrumented with a rein-tension device and reflective optical tracking markers. Subjective assessment of horse’s dominant side, and movement, were determined without rein-tension (free walk and trot); and with rein-tension (long-reined walk and trot). Continuous rein-force data from both sides were collected over ~60s from each trial. Movement was recorded using a 12-camera optical motion capture system. One randomly assigned TMJ was subsequently injected with lipopolysaccharide and the treadmill tests repeated by investigators blinded to treatment side. A second, identical assessment was performed 10 days later with the opposite TMJ being the target of intervention.ResultsAll horses showed reduced rein-tension on the injected (inflamed) side. Increased rein-tension was required on the non-injected side at trot, to maintain them in the correct position on the treadmill post-injection. The only kinematic variable to show any significant change due to rein tension or TMJ inflammation during the walk or trot was an increase in forward head tilt in the presence of rein tension in the trot after injection.Main limitationsLow number of horses and investigation of response to acute inflammation only.ConclusionTMJ inflammation changed, subjectively and objectively, the response to rein-input, but the horses did not become lame

Age differences in upper extremity joint moments and strength during a laboratory-based tether-release forward fall arrest in older women

Age-related declines in upper extremity muscle strength may affect an older adult’s ability to land and control a simulated forward fall impact. The role of individual upper extremity joints during a forward fall impact has not been examined. The purpose was to evaluate the age differences in upper extremity joint moment contributions during a simulated forward fall and upper extremity muscle strength in older women. A convenience sample of 68 older women (70 (8) yrs) performed three trials of a simulated forward fall. Percentage joint moments of the upper extremity were recorded. Upper extremity muscle strength was collected via handgrip, hand-held dynamometry of the shoulder and elbow and a custom multi-joint concentric and eccentric strength isokinetic dynamometer protocol. Percentage joint moment contributions differed between women in their sixties and seventies with significantly greater relative shoulder joint involvement (P = .008), coupled with lower elbow joint contributions (P = .004) in comparison to 80 year olds. An increase in each year of age was associated with a 4% increase in elbow contribution (Beta = -0.421, r2 = 17.9, P = 0.0001) and a 3.7% decrease in shoulder contribution (Beta = 0.373, r2 = 14.6, P = 0.002). Older women exhibit different landing strategies as they age. Fall injury prevention research should consider interventions focused on these differences taking into account the contributions of upper extremity strength

The effect of acute equine temporomandibular joint inflammation on response to rein-tension and kinematics

BackgroundAlthough the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is the major contact point between the reins in the riders’ hand, the bit in the mouth, and the rest of the horse under saddle, the role of inflammation of this joint on equine locomotion and rein tension is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the effect of acute TMJ inflammation on rein-tension and horse movement when horses were long-reined on a treadmill.Study designA randomized, controlled, cross-over design.MethodsFive horses were trained by one clinician to walk and trot on a treadmill wearing long-reining equipment instrumented with a rein-tension device and reflective optical tracking markers. Subjective assessment of horse’s dominant side, and movement, were determined without rein-tension (free walk and trot); and with rein-tension (long-reined walk and trot). Continuous rein-force data from both sides were collected over ~60s from each trial. Movement was recorded using a 12-camera optical motion capture system. One randomly assigned TMJ was subsequently injected with lipopolysaccharide and the treadmill tests repeated by investigators blinded to treatment side. A second, identical assessment was performed 10 days later with the opposite TMJ being the target of intervention.ResultsAll horses showed reduced rein-tension on the injected (inflamed) side. Increased rein-tension was required on the non-injected side at trot, to maintain them in the correct position on the treadmill post-injection. The only kinematic variable to show any significant change due to rein tension or TMJ inflammation during the walk or trot was an increase in forward head tilt in the presence of rein tension in the trot after injection.Main limitationsLow number of horses and investigation of response to acute inflammation only.ConclusionTMJ inflammation changed, subjectively and objectively, the response to rein-input, but the horses did not become lame

Fall arrest strategy training improves upper body response time compared to standard fall prevention exercise in older women: A randomized trial

Introduction: Exercise can decrease fall risk in older adults but less is known about training to reduce injury risk in the event a fall is unavoidable. The purpose of this study was to compare standard fall prevention exercises to novel Fall Arrest Strategy Training (FAST); exercises designed to improve upper body capacity to reduce fall-injury risk in older women. Method: Forty women (mean age 74.5 years) participated in either Standard (n=19) or FAST (n=21) twice per week for 12 weeks. Both interventions included lower body strength, balance, walking practice, agility and education. FAST added exercises designed to enhance forward landing and descent control such as upper body strengthening, speed and practice of landing and descent on outstretched hands. Results: Both FAST and Standard significantly improved strength, mobility, balance, and fall risk factors from pre to post-intervention. There was a significant time by group interaction effect for upper body response time where FAST improved but Standard did not (p = .038). Discussion: FAST resulted in similar gains in factors that reduce fall risk as a standard fall prevention program; with the additional benefit of improving speed of arm protective responses; a factor that may help enhance landing position and reduce injury risks such as head impact during a forward fall

Spatiotemporal walking performance in different settings: effects of walking speed and sex

BackgroundUnderstanding the factors that influence walking is important as quantitative walking assessments have potential to inform health risk assessments. Wearable technology innovation has enabled quantitative walking assessments to be conducted in different settings. Understanding how different settings influence quantitative walking performance is required to better utilize the health-related potential of quantitative walking assessments.Research questionHow does spatiotemporal walking performance differ during walking in different settings at different speeds for young adults?MethodsForty-two young adults [21 male (23 ± 4 years), 21 female (24 ± 5 years)] walked in two laboratory settings (overground, treadmill) and three non-laboratory settings (hallway, indoor open, outdoor pathway) at three self-selected speeds (slow, preferred, fast) following verbal instructions. Six walking trials of each condition (10 m in laboratory overground, 20 m in other settings) were completed. Participants wore 17 inertial sensors (Xsens Awinda, Movella, Henderson, NV) and spatiotemporal parameters were computed from sensor-derived kinematics. Setting × speed × sex repeated measures analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.ResultsRegardless of the speed condition, participants walked faster overground when compared to while on the treadmill and walked faster in the indoor open and outdoor pathway settings when compared to the laboratory overground setting. At slow speeds, participants also walked faster in the hallway when compared to the laboratory overground setting. Females had greater cadence when compared to males, independent of settings and speed conditions.SignificanceParticularly at slow speeds, spatiotemporal walking performance was different between the settings, suggesting that setting characteristics such as walkway boundary definition may significantly influence spatiotemporal walking performance

Does functional performance and upper body strength predict upper extremity reaction and movement time in older women?

Background: Reaction time to initiate upper limb movement and movement time to place hands on the landing surface may be important factors in forward fall landing and impact, contributing to injury reduction. The aim was to investigate the relationship of physical function and upper body strength to upper limb reaction and movement time in older female participants. Methods: 75 female participants (72 ± 8 yrs) performed 5 arm response trials. Reaction time (signal to initiation of movement), and movement time (initial movement to contact), were collected using 3D motion capture. Additional variables were: handgrip; sit-to-stand; shoulder flexion and elbow extension strength measured by hand-held dynamometry; one-legged balance; fall risk; and physical activity scores. Prediction variables for reaction and movement time were determined in separate backward selection multiple regression analyses. Significance was set at P<0.05. Findings: Significant regression equations for RT (r2 = .08, P = 0.013) found a relationship between stronger handgrip (Beta = -.002) and faster reaction time, accounting for 8% variance. For movement time (r2 = .06, P= .036) greater shoulder flexion strength (Beta = -.04) was related to faster movement time, explaining 6% variance. Stronger SF strength was related to a decrease in MT by 4%. Discussion: A relationship between arm strength measures and faster upper body reaction and movement time was shown, with 10-20% higher strength associated with a 5% faster response time. Even though this was a relatively weak relationship, given that strength is a modifiable component this provides a potential avenue for future intervention efforts. This in turn could have an impact on forward fall landing and potential reduction of injury risk