Normal imaging findings after aortic valve implantation on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography

Background: To determine the normal perivalvular 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) within one year after aortic prosthetic heart valve (PHV) implantation. Methods: Patients with uncomplicated aortic PHV implantation were prospectively included and underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at either 5 (± 1) weeks (group 1), 12 (± 2) weeks (group 2) or 52 (± 8) weeks (group 3) after implantation. 18F-FDG uptake around the PHV was scored qualitatively (none/low/intermediate/high) and quantitatively by measuring the maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) and target to background ratio (SUVratio). Results: In total, 37 patients (group 1: n = 12, group 2: n = 12, group 3: n = 13) (mean age 66 ± 8 years) were prospectively included. Perivalvular 18F-FDG uptake was low (8/12 (67%)) and intermediate (4/12 (33%)) in group 1, low (7/12 (58%)) and intermediate (5/12 (42%)) in group 2, and low (8/13 (62%)) and intermediate (5/13 (38%)) in group 3 (P = 0.91). SUVmax was 4.1 ± 0.7, 4.6 ± 0.9 and 3.8 ± 0.7 (mean ± SD, P = 0.08), and SUVratio was 2.0 [1.9 to 2.2], 2.0 [1.8 to 2.6], and 1.9 [1.7 to 2.0] (median [IQR], P = 0.81) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Non-infected aortic PHV have similar low to intermediate perivalvular 18F-FDG uptake with similar SUVmax and SUVratio at 5, 12, and 52 weeks after implantation

The Efficacy of Coil Embolization to Obtain Intrahepatic Redistribution in Radioembolization: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of coil embolization to obtain intrahepatic redistribution in patients undergoing radioembolization. Materials and Method: All patients treated with radioembolization at our institute were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases in which a tumor-feeding vessel was coil-embolized were selected. Two nuclear medicine physicians visually assessed the effect of redistribution. Furthermore, the redistribution of microspheres was measured by quantifying the activity distributed to the coil-embolized (dependent) segment relative to the other (non-dependent) segments and to the tumor(s) in that segment. Quantitative analysis was performed on post-treatment 90Y-PET and 166Ho-SPECT using Simplicit90Y software. Lesion response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 criteria at 3 months post-treatment. Results: Out of 37 cases, 32 were suitable for quantitative analysis and 37 for qualitative analysis. In the qualitative analysis, redistribution was deemed successful in 69% of cases. The quantitative analysis showed that the median ratio of the activity to the dependent embolized segments and the non-dependent segments was 0.88 (range 0.26–2.05) and 0.80 (range 0.19–1.62) for tumors in dependent segments compared with tumors in non-dependent segments. Using a cutoff ratio of 0.7 (30% lower activity concentration in comparison with the rest of the liver), 57% of cases were successful. At 3 months post-treatment, 6% of dependent tumors had partial response, 20% progressive disease, and 74% stable disease. In non-dependent tumors, this was, respectively, 16%, 20%, and 64%. Conclusion: Coil embolization of hepatic arteries to induce redistribution of microspheres has a limited success rate. Qualitative assessment tends to overrate redistribution

EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds

Abstract: Primary liver tumours (i.e. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) are among the most frequent cancers worldwide. However, only 10–20% of patients are amenable to curative treatment, such as resection or transplant. Liver metastases are most frequently caused by colorectal cancer, which accounts for the second most cancer-related deaths in Europe. In both primary and secondary tumours, radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. The vast potential of personalized dosimetry has also been shown, resulting in markedly increased response rates and overall survival. In a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, the role of radioembolization will be subject to changes. Therefore, the decision for radioembolization should be taken by a multidisciplinary tumour board in accordance with the current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this procedure guideline is to assist the nuclear medicine physician in treating and managing patients undergoing radioembolization treatment. Preamble: The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide among individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. These guidelines are intended to assist practitioners in providing appropriate nuclear medicine care for patients. They are notinflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set out in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine involves not only the science but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or topredict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognised that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Personalised radioembolization improves outcomes in refractory intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study

Purpose: Reported outcomes of patients with intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IH-CCA) treated with radioembolization are highly variable, which indicates differences in included patients’ characteristics and/or procedure-related variables. This study aimed to identify patient- and treatment-related variables predictive for radioembolization outcome. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study enrolled 58 patients with unresectable and chemorefractory IH-CCA treated with resin 90Y-microspheres. Clinicopathologic data were collected from patient records. Metabolic parameters of liver tumor(s) and presence of lymph node metastasis were measured on baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT. 99mTc-MAA tumor to liver uptake ratio (TLRMAA) was computed for each lesion on the SPECT-CT. Activity prescription using body-surface-area (BSA) or more personalized partition-model was recorded. The study endpoint was overall survival (OS) starting from date of radioembolization. Statistical analysis was performed by the log-rank test and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazards model. Results: Median OS (mOS) post-radioembolization of the entire cohort was 10.3 months. Variables associated with significant differences in terms of OS were serum albumin (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78, 95%CI:1.29–5.98, p = 0.002), total bilirubin (HR = 2.17, 95%CI:1.14–4.12, p = 0.009), aspartate aminotransferase (HR = 2.96, 95%CI:1.50–5.84, p < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (HR = 2.02, 95%CI:1.05–3.90, p = 0.01) and γ-GT (HR = 2.61, 95%CI:1.31–5.22, p < 0.001). The presence of lymph node metastasis as well as a TLRMAA < 1.9 were associated with shorter mOS: HR = 2.35, 95%CI:1.08–5.11, p = 0.008 and HR = 2.92, 95%CI:1.01–8.44, p = 0.009, respectively. Finally, mOS was significantly shorter in patients treated according to the BSA method compared to the partition-model: mOS of 5.5 vs 14.9 months (HR = 2.52, 95%CI:1.23–5.16, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the only variable that increased outcome prediction above the clinical variables was the activity prescription method with HR of 2.26 (95%CI:1.09–4.70, p = 0.03). The average mean radiation dose to tumors was significantly higher with the partition-model (86Gy) versus BSA (38Gy). Conclusion: Radioembolization efficacy in patients with unresectable recurrent and/or chemorefractory IH-CCA strongly depends on the tumor radiation dose. Personalized activity prescription should be performed.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe