22 research outputs found

    The Membrane Fusion Step of Vaccinia Virus Entry Is Cooperatively Mediated by Multiple Viral Proteins and Host Cell Components

    Get PDF
    For many viruses, one or two proteins allow cell attachment and entry, which occurs through the plasma membrane or following endocytosis at low pH. In contrast, vaccinia virus (VACV) enters cells by both neutral and low pH routes; four proteins mediate cell attachment and twelve that are associated in a membrane complex and conserved in all poxviruses are dedicated to entry. The aim of the present study was to determine the roles of cellular and viral proteins in initial stages of entry, specifically fusion of the membranes of the mature virion and cell. For analysis of the role of cellular components, we used well characterized inhibitors and measured binding of a recombinant VACV virion containing Gaussia luciferase fused to a core protein; viral and cellular membrane lipid mixing with a self-quenching fluorescent probe in the virion membrane; and core entry with a recombinant VACV expressing firefly luciferase and electron microscopy. We determined that inhibitors of tyrosine protein kinases, dynamin GTPase and actin dynamics had little effect on binding of virions to cells but impaired membrane fusion, whereas partial cholesterol depletion and inhibitors of endosomal acidification and membrane blebbing had a severe effect at the later stage of core entry. To determine the role of viral proteins, virions lacking individual membrane components were purified from cells infected with members of a panel of ten conditional-lethal inducible mutants. Each of the entry protein-deficient virions had severely reduced infectivity and except for A28, L1 and L5 greatly impaired membrane fusion. In addition, a potent neutralizing L1 monoclonal antibody blocked entry at a post-membrane lipid-mixing step. Taken together, these results suggested a 2-step entry model and implicated an unprecedented number of viral proteins and cellular components involved in signaling and actin rearrangement for initiation of virus-cell membrane fusion during poxvirus entry

    Range Contractions of North American Carnivores and Ungulates

    Full text link

    A procedure for orthorectification of sub-decimeter resolution imagery obtained with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV

    No full text
    ABSTRACT Digital aerial photography acquired with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has great value for resource management due to flexibility and relatively low cost for image acquisition. The very high resolution imagery (5 cm) allows for mapping bare soil and vegetation types, structure and patterns in great detail. While image acquisition is relatively straightforward, the creation of orthorectified, GIS-ready image mosaics presents multiple challenges. Those include relatively small image footprints, image distortion due to the use of low-cost digital cameras, difficulty in locating ground control points and in automatic generation of tie points, and relatively large errors in exterior orientation (camera position and attitude information from the UAV's GPS/IMU). We developed an automated procedure to improve the accuracy of the exterior orientation by matching the UAV images to an orthorectified reference image. Using the UAV reported exterior orientation and camera geometry, combined with the reference image and DEM, the algorithm simulates image acquisition and then computes the covariance between camera image and simulated image pixels. With this evaluation function, a heuristic search algorithm finds successive improvements to the external orientation, ultimately producing a corrected exterior orientation that allows orthorectification with minimal input of tie points and/or ground control points. The RMS error for a 5-cm resolution, 257-image mosaic was 48 cm. Cost and turnaround time for production of orthorectified mosaics from UAV imagery are considerably reduced due to less time and money spent on ground control point and manual tie point collection

    Defoliation Response of Bluebunch Wheatgrass and Crested Wheatgrass: Why We Cannot Graze These Two Species in the Same Manner

    No full text
    The Rangelands archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact [email protected] for further information.Migrated from OJS platform March 202
    corecore