61 research outputs found

    Does working alliance have an influence on pain and physical functioning in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain; a systematic review

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background: Working alliance can possibly influence patients' experiences of pain and physical functioning. The aim of this systematic review is to merge evidence from literature regarding the influence of patients' perceived working alliance on pain and physical functioning in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: A systematic review in which randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included that assessed the influence of working alliance on either pain or physical functioning in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The methodological quality of the included studies were rated by means of the PEDro score and STROBE statement. Results: The first step of the search process provided 1469 studies. After screening, five studies were included in this review including one RCT and four cohort studies of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. One cohort study was rated as low methodological quality and the other studies as high methodological quality. There was a significant effect of working alliance on the outcome of pain severity, pain interference, and physical functioning in all studies. Physical functioning was measured by means of questionnaires and functional capacity tests. The effect on questionnaires was positive; the effect was conflicting on functional capacity. Conclusion: When influencing pain with treatment, a patient's perceived working alliance during treatment does predict pain reduction and improvement in physical functioning. It is recommended to inquire about a patient's working alliance during treatment in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

    Predictors of stable return-to-work in non-acute, non-specific spinal pain: low total prior sick-listing, high self prediction and young age. A two-year prospective cohort study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-specific spinal pain (NSP), comprising back and/or neck pain, is one of the leading disorders in long-term sick-listing. During 2000-2004, 125 Swedish primary-care patients with non-acute NSP, full-time sick-listed 6 weeks-2 years, were included in a randomized controlled trial to compare a cognitive-behavioural programme with traditional primary care. This prospective cohort study is a re-assessment of the data from the randomized trial with the 2 treatment groups considered as a single cohort. The aim was to investigate which baseline variables predict a stable return-to-work during a 2-year period after baseline: objective variables from function tests, socioeconomic, subjective and/or treatment variables. Stable return-to-work was a return-to-work lasting for at least 1 month from the start of follow-up.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p><it>Stable return-to-work </it>was the outcome variable, the above-mentioned factors were the predictive variables in multiple-logistic regression models, one per follow-up at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after baseline. The factors from univariate analyzes with a <it>p</it>-value of at most .10 were included. The non-significant variables were excluded stepwise to yield models comprising only significant factors (<it>p </it>< .05). As the comparatively few cases made it risky to associate certain predictors with certain time-points, we finally considered the predictors which were represented in at least 3 follow-ups. They are presented with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Three variables qualified, all of them represented in 3 follow-ups: <it>Low total prior sick-listing </it>(including all diagnoses) was the strongest predictor in 2 follow-ups, 18 and 24 months, OR 4.8 [1.9-12.3] and 3.8 [1.6-8.7] respectively, <it>High self prediction </it>(the patients' own belief in return-to-work) was the strongest at 12 months, OR 5.2 [1.5-17.5] and <it>Young age </it>(max 44 years) the second strongest at 18 months, OR 3.5 [1.3-9.1].</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In primary-care patients with non-acute NSP, the strong predictors of stable return-to-work were 2 socioeconomic variables, <it>Low total prior sick-listing </it>and <it>Young age</it>, and 1 subjective variable, <it>High self-prediction</it>. Objective variables from function tests and treatment variables were non-predictors. Except for <it>Young age</it>, the predictors have previously been insufficiently studied, and so our study should widen knowledge within clinical practice.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Trial registration number for the original trial NCT00488735.</p

    Lumbar spinal cord explants from neonatal rat display age-related decrease of outgrowth in culture

    Get PDF
    Lumbar spinal cord explants, harvested from neonatal rat pups aged between postnatal day 0 (P0) and P7, were cultured for a period of 48 h in the chemically defined medium R12 [17] (Romijn, H.J., van-Huijen, F., Wolters, P.S., Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 8 (1984) 301–334), embedded in a collagen matrix. The outgrowth into the surrounding matrix was quantified. Age-matched cortical explants were used as controls. Despite adaptations of the culture protocol, outgrowth remained variable. Statistical analysis demonstrated a clear relation between the age of the explant (at the time of explantation) and the number of neurites in the corona surrounding the explant. The number of outgrowing neurites decreased sharply with age. The average number of neurites per explant obeyed to the expression log(N)= −0.652 A+17 (N: the number of neurites per explant; A: the age expressed in gestational days; A Δ [G23–G30]; G23 signifying gestational day 23, or P0). The observed age-related decrease of outgrowth could not be explained by progressive myelination of the spinal cord white matter, nor by the absence of trophic support from muscle, but may be related to a progressive inability of the spinal neurites to interact with collagen

    Intrinsic properties of the developing motor cortex in the rat: in vitro axons from the medial somatomotor cortex grow faster than axons from the lateral somatomotor cortex

    Get PDF
    The axons that originate in the medial somatomotor cortex of the rat depart, during development, after those from the lateral somatomotor cortex, yet they arrive in the cervical spinal cord first. Either the medially originating axons elongate faster, or the laterally originating ones pause along the descent pathway. To investigate the presence of an intrinsic difference of the axonal elongation velocity between the lateral and medial somatomotor cortical areas, we cultured explants taken from these areas for 2 days, and measured the length of the outgrowth. After 2 days the explants were surrounded by a radiate corona of axons of which the longest measured 1.95 mm. A significant difference was detected between the medial and lateral somatomotor cortical areas in vitro. Axons originating from explants taken from the medial somatomotor cortical area are, after 2 days in culture, on average 0.16 mm longer than those from the lateral somatomotor cortical area. Though the observed difference is not large enough to allow for the overtaking observed in vivo, it does indicate that intrinsic differences exist within the developing rat somatomotor cortex. This in turn indicates that intrinsic cortical traits not only influence regionalization and targeting behavior of cortical projection neurons, but also their axonal elongation speed
    • 

    corecore