Oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is present in lipid rafts and caveolin-1-enriched membranes

The oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is a ligand of the neuronal Nogo receptor and a potent inhibitor of neurite outgrowth, but its physiological function remains to be elucidated. The oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is anchored solely in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane via its glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor, and through its leucine-rich repeat domain, it likely interacts with other proteins. In the present study, we compare its buoyancy and detergent solubility characteristics with those of other myelin proteins. Based on its detergent solubility profile and membrane fractionation using established ultracentrifugation procedures, we conclude that the oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is a lipid raft component that is closely associated with the axolemma. Moreover, it associates with caveolin-1 and caveolin-1-enriched membranes. We postulate that, by virtue of its concentration in lipid rafts and perhaps through interactions with caveolin-1, the oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein may influence signaling pathways. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/48768/1/20237_ftp.pd

Human CLEC9A antibodies deliver Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) antigen to CD141+ dendritic cells to activate naïve and memory WT1‐specific CD8+ T cells

Objectives Vaccines that prime Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1)‐specific CD8+ T cells are attractive cancer immunotherapies. However, immunogenicity and clinical response rates may be enhanced by delivering WT1 to CD141+ dendritic cells (DCs). The C‐type lectin‐like receptor CLEC9A is expressed exclusively by CD141+ DCs and regulates CD8+ T‐cell responses. We developed a new vaccine comprising a human anti‐CLEC9A antibody fused to WT1 and investigated its capacity to target human CD141+ DCs and activate naïve and memory WT1‐specific CD8+ T cells. Methods WT1 was genetically fused to antibodies specific for human CLEC9A, DEC‐205 or β‐galactosidase (untargeted control). Activation of WT1‐specific CD8+ T‐cell lines following cross‐presentation by CD141+ DCs was quantified by IFNγ ELISPOT. Humanised mice reconstituted with human immune cell subsets, including a repertoire of naïve WT1‐specific CD8+ T cells, were used to investigate naïve WT1‐specific CD8+ T‐cell priming. Results The CLEC9A‐WT1 vaccine promoted cross‐presentation of WT1 epitopes to CD8+ T cells and mediated priming of naïve CD8+ T cells more effectively than the DEC‐205‐WT1 and untargeted control‐WT1 vaccines. Conclusions Delivery of WT1 to CD141+ DCs via CLEC9A stimulates CD8+ T cells more potently than either untargeted delivery or widespread delivery to all Ag‐presenting cells via DEC‐205, suggesting that cross‐presentation by CD141+ DCs is sufficient for effective CD8+ T‐cell priming in humans. The CLEC9A‐WT1 vaccine is a promising candidate immunotherapy for malignancies that express WT1

Artesunate-related fever and delayed hemolysis in a returning traveler

Malaria is a serious and sometimes fatal disease caused by an intraerythrocytic parasite, and is commonly seen in developing countries. Approximately 1500 cases of malaria are diagnosed in the United States each year, mostly in travelers and immigrants returning from endemic areas [1]. There are many different regimens used to treat malaria, some of which are not approved in the USA. The side effects of these medications may not be familiar to physicians in the USA. We report a case of a returning traveler from Nigeria presenting with fever and hemolytic anemia caused by a delayed response to artesunate given 3 weeks earlier while in Nigeria. To our knowledge, there are few cases reported in the United States of hemolytic anemia secondary to artesunate therapy [2]

Pilot Study of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Pre- and Post-Risk-Adapted Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis

Treatment for AL amyloidosis aims to eradicate clonal plasma cells, thereby disrupting the amyloid deposition causing organ damage. Risk-adapted high-dose melphalan plus autologous stem cell transplantation (RA-ASCT) is an effective therapy. We conducted a prospective pilot analysis of a comprehensive approach using bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) before and after RA-ASCT in 19 patients. BD induction (up to 3 cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m i.v. and dexamethasone 40 mg orally [p.o.] or i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) was followed by RA-ASCT and then BD consolidation (6 cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg p.o. or i.v. weekly for 4 weeks, every 12 weeks). The overall hematologic response rate (partial response or better) was 95%, including 37% minimal residual disease negative [MRD(-)] complete response (CR) by flow cytometry (sensitivity up to 1/10 cells). At 2 years, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50% to 93%) and 84% (95% CI, 69% to 99%), respectively, with median duration of follow-up in survivors of 61 months (range, 42 to 84 months). In a landmark analysis, patients achieving MRD(-) CR had superior PFS (P= .008). This approach is safe and yields deep and durable remissions promoting organ recovery. Each treatment phase deepened the response. Future aims include improving the efficacy and toxicity of each phase

Ixazomib and dexamethasone in high risk smoldering multiple myeloma: A clinical and correlative pilot study

8051 Background: Patients with high risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) have an increased risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM)- median time < 2 years. The standard management of these patients currently is close clinical monitoring; however, randomized trials show longer progression-free and overall survival in in HR-SMM patients treated with the oral immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide. We report the use ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with dexamethasone in the setting of HR-SMM. Because proteasome inhibitors can provide deep clinical responses in patients with MM, we set the pre-specified threshold for efficacy high (overall response rate of ≥75%). Methods: In this single arm pilot trial of ixazomib/dexamethasone, patients received 12 4-week cycles of ixazomib/dexamethasone followed by ixazomib maintenance for 24 cycles. The primary endpoint is best overall response after 12 cycles and second objectives include duration of response, safety, and progression free survival. Results: 14 patients with HR-SMM were enrolled between 06/2016 and 03/2018. The median age is 65 years and 10 (71%) of patients were male. 11 (79%) patients were high-risk by the PETHEMA criteria, 2 (14%) by the Mayo Clinic criteria and 1 (7%) by both. At data cut-off (02/07/2019), patients completed a median of 17 cycles and 10 (71%) are continuing treatment. 4 patients have stopped treatment (2 patients for raise in serum markers without progression to MM, and 1 each for toxicities, and co-morbidities unrelated to treatment). 9 (64%) achieved an objective response (8 PR, and 1 VGPR) and no patient has progressed to MM. Non-heme adverse events included 3 grade 1 GI events, 2 grade 3 lung infection, 1 grade 2 acute kidney injury, and 1 had grade 1 fatigue that was possibly related to treatment. Conclusions: Ixazomib/dexamethasone appears well tolerated with high overall response (9/14; 64%) in patients with HR-SMM. Although the trial does not meet our pre-specified threshold for efficacy (i.e. best overall response rate of 75%), with a median follow-up of 17 months, no patient progressed to MM and only 2 patients had serologic progression. These results support further evaluation of ixazomib/dexamethasone alone and in combination with other agents as treatment for patients with HR-SMM. Clinical trial information: NCT02697383

Human CLEC9A antibodies deliver NY-ESO-1 antigen to CD141+ dendritic cells to activate naïve and memory NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells

Background Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial for the efficacy of cancer vaccines, but current vaccines do not harness the key cDC1 subtype required for effective CD8+ T-cell-mediated tumor immune responses. Vaccine immunogenicity could be enhanced by specific delivery of immunogenic tumor antigens to CD141+ DCs, the human cDC1 equivalent. CD141+ DCs exclusively express the C-type-lectin-like receptor CLEC9A, which is important for the regulation of CD8+ T cell responses. This study developed a new vaccine that harnesses a human anti-CLEC9A antibody to specifically deliver the immunogenic tumor antigen, NY-ESO-1 (New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1), to human CD141+ DCs. The ability of the CLEC9A-NY-ESO-1 antibody to activate NY-ESO-1-specific naïve and memory CD8+ T cells was examined and compared with a vaccine comprised of a human DEC-205-NY-ESO-1 antibody that targets all human DCs.Methods Human anti-CLEC9A, anti-DEC-205 and isotype control IgG4 antibodies were genetically fused to NY-ESO-1 polypeptide. Cross-presentation to NY-ESO-1-epitope-specific CD8+ T cells and reactivity of T cell responses in patients with melanoma were assessed by interferon γ (IFNγ) production following incubation of CD141+ DCs and patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells with targeting antibodies. Humanized mice containing human DC subsets and a repertoire of naïve NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells were used to investigate naïve T cell priming. T cell effector function was measured by expression of IFNγ, MIP-1β, tumor necrosis factor and CD107a and by lysis of target tumor cells.Results CLEC9A-NY-ESO-1 antibodies (Abs) were effective at mediating delivery and cross-presentation of multiple NY-ESO-1 epitopes by CD141+ DCs for activation of NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells. When benchmarked to NY-ESO-1 conjugated to an untargeted control antibody or to anti-human DEC-205, CLEC9A-NY-ESO-1 was superior at ex vivo reactivation of NY-ESO-1-specific T cell responses in patients with melanoma. Moreover, CLEC9A-NY-ESO-1 induced priming of naïve NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells with polyclonal effector function and potent tumor killing capacity in vitro.Conclusions These data advocate human CLEC9A-NY-ESO-1 Ab as an attractive strategy for specific targeting of CD141+ DCs to enhance tumor immunogenicity in NY-ESO-1-expressing malignancies

Continuous induction with lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a case for response-adapted approach

Although upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) generally improves progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), the overall survival (OS) benefit and optimal timing of ASCT are not well established. Patients with early response may be able to safely continue induction and avoid ASCT without compromised outcomes. We report an extended follow-up analysis of a phase 2 trial that randomized transplant-eligible patients with NDMM who responded to induction (50/65 patients) to continued induction or ASCT; median follow-up was 8.0 years. Patients had similar 8-year PFS (55% vs. 43%), 8-year OS (83% vs. 72%), and rates of at least very good partial response (72% vs. 84%) whether continuing induction of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Ld arm) or receiving ASCT (Ld + ASCT arm) (p = 0.5). Notably, over 50% of patients receiving continuous Ld had PFS of 5-10 years. These results suggest the need for prospective trials incorporating response-adapted therapeutic approaches to NDMM. STATEMENT OF PRIOR PRESENTATION Presented in abstract form (interim analysis) at the 56th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (San Francisco, CA, 6 December 2014) and at the 57th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (Orlando, FL, 3 December 2015)

An Observational, Retrospective Analysis of Retreatment with Carfilzomib in the Management of Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Background: Several studies have indicated that the depth and duration of treatment response in multiple myeloma are both reduced in the relapsed setting. With further lines of therapy, responses continue to weaken in depth and shorten in duration. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines suggest that regimens may be repeated in the relapsed setting if there has been a duration of at least 6 months since that regimen was given; however, there is limited information regarding treatment response and duration in the setting of re-treating patients with agents previously utilized. Moreover, preliminary data has suggested that carfilzomib-based regimens in the frontline may be able to attain deeper and longer responses than alternative therapies, which has led to carfilzomib being used more frequently in the frontline. This motivated us to investigate the treatment response, depth, and safety of re-challenging patients with carfilzomib in the relapsed setting. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, we identified all patients who were treated with multiple courses of carfilzomib-based regimens at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between January 1, 2014 and November 30, 2018. Our primary objectives were to assess the response, duration of response and treatment, and safety of re-exposure to carfilzomib-based regimens. Responses were assessed as per IMWG 2016 consensus criteria (Lancet Oncol 2016). In this review we describe the clinical course, safety, and efficacy of re-challenging patients with carfilzomib in the relapsed and refractory settings. Results: Fifteen patients were identified as having received multiple, independent lines of carfilzomib-based therapy. The median age of the cohort was 58 years (49-76) with 53% male (8); two patients had R-ISS stage 1, eight stage 2, and five stage 3 disease. Five of these patients received their initial carfilzomib in the frontline as part of KRD; four of whom attained a sCR with the fifth attaining a VGPR. The remaining ten patients received their initial carfilzomib in the second-line (4) or 3rd and subsequent lines (6). Upon re-exposure to carfilzomib, patients were heavily treated with a median of four lines of therapy (2-15). All but three patients had at least one adverse cytogenetic abnormality; eight with 17p-, five with 13q-, three with t4;14, and six with 1q+. Regimens utilized in the relapsed setting included KRD (N=4), KPD (N=3), Cyklone (N=2), KD + HDAC inhibitor (N=3), KD (N=1), KCD (N=1), and KRD + daratumumab (N=1). Four patients received carfilzomib at a dose of 27 mg/m2 while the remaining 10 received > 36 mg/m2. Responses were seen in all but four patients (two VGPR, five PR, and four MR), with one patient experiencing progression during carfilzomib with no response; notably, this patient only attained a MR to primary carfilzomib therapy and their second exposure was the 15th line of therapy. The median time to next therapy was 4.8 months (1.9-19.4) with one patient being bridged to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), one to allogeneic HCT, and three are currently receiving ongoing carfilzomib treatment (13.9, 2.8, 2.5 months with VGPR, MR, and PR, respectively). Exacerbation of baseline hypertension was identified in three patients, but these instances were treated successfully with standard medications with no further complications. No additional cardiovascular events were identified in the frontline or re-treatment settings. Conclusions: We report that in a heavily pre-treated, high risk patient cohort, patients previously treated with carfilzomib-based regimens may be safely re-challenged with carfilzomib. Importantly, none of these patients experienced cardiovascular adverse effects other than exacerbation of underlying hypertension, further supporting the ability to safely re-treat a select group of patients with carfilzomib. We conclude that depending on the patient and treatment history, re-challenging with carfilzomib at relapse may be appropriate salvage therapy, particularly as a bridge towards HCT and/or clinical trials. Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Lesokhin:Genentech: Research Funding; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landau:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shah:Janssen Pharmaceutica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Scordo:Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Giralt:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy. Landgren:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Merck: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding