16 research outputs found

    An invasion of cheats: the evolution of worthless nuptial gifts

    Get PDF
    AbstractNuptial gifts are food items or inedible tokens that are transferred to females during courtship or copulation [1–3]. Tokens are of no direct value to females, and it is unknown why females require such worthless gifts as a precondition of mating. One hypothesis is that token giving arose in species that gave nutritious gifts and males exploited female preferences for nutritional gifts by substituting more easily obtainable but worthless items [4]. An invasion of such behavior would require that females accept the substitute gift and copulate for a period of time similar to that with genuine gifts. We show that both these prerequisites are met in the dance fly Rhamphomyia sulcata, in which females normally accept a nutritious gift. We removed the gift from copulating pairs and replaced it with either a large or small prey item or inedible token. We found that although pairs copulated longest with a large genuine gift, the tokens resulted in copula durations equivalent to those with a small genuine gift. We also observed that males that returned to the lek with tokens re-paired successfully. These findings suggest that female behavior in genuine gift-giving species is susceptible to the invasion of male cheating on reproductive investment

    Sexual selection in the gift-giving dance fly <em>Rhamphomyia sulcata</em> favours small males carrying small gifts.

    No full text
    In some species of insects males transfer a gift to females during courtship or copulation. In the dance flies these nuptial gifts vary from nutritious prey items to inedible tokens such as a leaf, stone, or silk balloon. Nuptial gifts in dance flies are presumed to increase male mating success. We examined the strength and form of sexual selection on male Rhamphomyia sulcata, an empidid in which males provide females with a nutritious prey item as a nuptial gift. We found that whereas large males carried large gifts, neither large males nor gifts were targets of sexual selection. Indeed, correlational selection analysis and nonparametric examination of the fitness surfaces revealed that small males carrying small gifts were the most successful. Males may be more maneuverable or flight efficient with small gifts, or small males with large gifts may be unable to carry both a large gift and a female in the paired descent flight. These results suggest carrying constraints may be an important factor in determining selection on nuptial gift size. The largest target of sexual selection was old males. Old males were also paired with the largest and most fecund females, highlighting the role mate quality can further contribute to selection on males. Correlational selection analysis also revealed selection for an increase in covariance between male wing length and body size, and for an increase in slope between these traits. Males who deviate away from the optimal phenotypic relationship for two tightly related morphological traits, such as tibia and wing length, may have overall reduced performance. These findings highlight the role correlational sexual selection can play in optimizing nonsexual male morphology and scaling relationships. This study questions the role of the nuptial gift in dance flies as a resource for females.</p

    Sperm competition and the level of polyandry in a bushcricket

    No full text
    Variation in paternity due to sperm competition or post-copulatory female choice has a major influence on animal mating system evolution and on the levels of genetic variability in natural populations. However, there are relatively few studies comparing the outcome of sperm-competition experiments in the laboratory with natural variation in polyandry among families from the field. In the bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger, females mate multiply, and the males provide them with a large, nutritious, and probably expensive, donation at mating. We examined paternity in a series of laboratory matings, where females mated with two males, and amongst a series of families collected from a natural population. In the laboratory, paternity was highly bimodally distributed: 24% of families had offspring fathered by the first male to mate, 68% by the second male (in only 8% was paternity shared). In the field, paternity was more mixed: only 27% of families had a single father, 14% had more than two fathers, whilst 59% had two fathers. While unsuccessful matings may contribute to the highly biased paternity in the laboratory, they cannot fully explain the high incidence of complete P2 families. Nonrandom sperm utilisation is therefore likely. Greater sperm mixing in the field probably results from females mating with more males, but the distribution of paternity also reflects an active process of nonrandom spenn utilisation. Confidence of paternity due to last male advantage may be relatively high in this species, and therefore may have facilitated the evolution of the large spermatophore in E. ephippiger.</p

    Variable maternal control of facultative egg diapause in the bushcricket <em>Ephippiger ephippiger</em>

    No full text
    1. Diapause is a term used to describe an arrest in the development of insects as adults, eggs, or embryos, and allows survival during adverse environmental conditions.2. The influence of maternal age on the proportion of eggs that entered an initial facultative diapause and on fecundity and egg mortality was investigated in the bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger.3. In the absence of variable abiotic cues such as temperature and photoperiod, most E. ephippiger females increase the proportion of their eggs that enter diapause as they age, however there are large differences among females, with a minority showing different trends. Fecundity and egg survival decline with female age and also differ among females.4. The influence of age on the incidence of diapause is likely to be an adaptive reproductive strategy, as those eggs laid later in the season are unlikely to complete egg development before the onset of winter. Females are probably hedging their bets by diversifying the rate of development among their offspring and effectively spreading development over several seasons. The low predictability of future environmental conditions might explain the heterogeneity of female reproductive strategies.</p
    corecore