2 research outputs found

    Biomed Res Int

    No full text
    The oral ecosystem is a very complex environment where more than 700 different bacterial species can be found. Most of them are organized in biofilm on dental and mucosal surfaces. Studying this community is important because a rupture in stability can lead to the preeminence of pathogenic microorganisms, causing dental decay, gingivitis, or periodontitis. The multitude of species complicates biofilm analysis so its reproduction, collection, and counting are very delicate. The development of experimental models of dental biofilms was therefore essential and multiple designs have emerged, each of them especially adapted to observing biofilm formation of specific bacteria within specific environments. The aim of this review is to analyze oral biofilm models

    Reliability of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify oral isolates of Streptococcus salivarius and Lactobacillus spp

    No full text
    Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in identifying bacteria isolated in the oral cavity known to be of probiotic interest. Design: We evaluated Bruker MALDI Biotyper for the identification of 92 clinical oral isolates of probiotic interest (31 Streptococcus salivarius and 61 Lactobacillus spp.) by comparing direct colony method with on-plate formic acid extraction. Isolates were previously identified by use of biochemical methods and molecular biology. Results: Using the manufacturer's suggested genus and species level cutoff scores, the direct colony method identified 42 (45.7%) isolates at the genus level and 35 (38%) at the species level while the on-plate extraction method correctly identified 90 (97.8%) isolates at the genus level and 82 (89.1%) at the species level. The difference between the two methods was statistically significant at the genus and species levels (P ≤ 0.0001). After dividing the isolates into two subgroups, the analysis was repeated. The direct colony method identified correctly all isolates of Streptococcus salivarius at the species level. In contrast, the direct colony method allowed the identification of only 11 (18%) lactobacilli at the genus level and 4 (6.6%) at the species level. The on-plate extraction method was statistically (P ? 0.0001) more efficient since 59 (96.7%) lactobacilli were identified at the genus level and 51 (83.6%) at the species level. Conclusions: MALDI Biotyper can efficiently identify Streptococcus salivarius regardless of the preparative method but on-plate extraction is superior to direct colony method for the identification of lactobacilli
    corecore