26 research outputs found
KERNEL MORPHOLOGY VARIATION IN A POPULATION DERIVED FROM A SOFT BY HARD WHEAT CROSS AND ASSOCIATIONS WITH END-USE QUALITY TRAITS
Estudo da Heterogeneidade das Variâncias para as Características Produtivas de Rebanhos da Raça Holandesa no Rio Grande do Sul
Coeficientes de herdabilidade e correlações genéticas para as produções de leite e de gordura, em diferentes níveis de produção, para raça Holandesa no estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Factors Affecting Stability of Modified Contemporary Comparison Sire Evaluations for Milk Yield
Adjustments to Cow Indexes for Milk Yield for Effects of Herd Mean and Standard Deviation
Factors Affecting Stability of Contemporary Comparison Evaluations of Sires for Milk Yield
Factors Affecting Stability of Modified Contemporary Comparison Sire Evaluations for Milk Yield
COMPARISON OF CURRENT SARCOPENIA CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA IN OLDER NEW ENGLAND WOMEN
Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia in a sample of older, sedentary women using criteria from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), the International Working Group (IWG), and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project (FNIHSP). Design: Cross-sectional analysis. Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling women (n = 61) aged 71.9 ± 4.6 years (mean±SD) with a BMI 27.3 ± 6.0 kg/m2 who by self-report were healthy and did not exercise were recruited and evaluated for sarcopenia. Measurements: Height, weight, grip strength, gait speed, and appendicular lean mass (via segmental multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis: SMF-BIA) were measured. Prevalence was reported using descriptive statistics and a Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the distribution frequency of sarcopenia classification by different criteria. Results: In this sample 14.8% met EWGSOP criteria, 6.6% met FNIHSP criteria, and 3.3% met IWG criteria. There was a borderline significant difference in distribution frequency between EWGSOP and IWG classification criteria (p=0.053). Conclusion: The variation in sarcopenia prevalence depending on the diagnostic criteria used is consistent with previous research and there are borderline significant differences between classification criteria in this population. These data suggest the need for additional examination to determine current cut points for ALM measured by SMF-BIA, as well as which established definition of sarcopenia is appropriate for this population.</jats:p
