Cellular Proteins in Influenza Virus Particles

Virions are thought to contain all the essential proteins that govern virus egress from the host cell and initiation of replication in the target cell. It has been known for some time that influenza virions contain nine viral proteins; however, analyses of other enveloped viruses have revealed that proteins from the host cell can also be detected in virions. To address whether the same is true for influenza virus, we used two complementary mass spectrometry approaches to perform a comprehensive proteomic analysis of purified influenza virus particles. In addition to the aforementioned nine virus-encoded proteins, we detected the presence of 36 host-encoded proteins. These include both cytoplasmic and membrane-bound proteins that can be grouped into several functional categories, such as cytoskeletal proteins, annexins, glycolytic enzymes, and tetraspanins. Interestingly, a significant number of these have also been reported to be present in virions of other virus families. Protease treatment of virions combined with immunoblot analysis was used to verify the presence of the cellular protein and also to determine whether it is located in the core of the influenza virus particle. Immunogold labeling confirmed the presence of membrane-bound host proteins on the influenza virus envelope. The identification of cellular constituents of influenza virions has important implications for understanding the interactions of influenza virus with its host and brings us a step closer to defining the cellular requirements for influenza virus replication. While not all of the host proteins are necessarily incorporated specifically, those that are and are found to have an essential role represent novel targets for antiviral drugs and for attenuation of viruses for vaccine purposes

The anti-cancer agents lenalidomide and pomalidomide inhibit the proliferation and function of T regulatory cells

Lenalidomide (Revlimid®; CC-5013) and pomalidomide (CC-4047) are IMiDs® proprietary drugs having immunomodulatory properties that have both shown activity in cancer clinical trials; lenalidomide is approved in the United States for a subset of MDS patients and for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma when used in combination with dexamethasone. These drugs exhibit a range of interesting clinical properties, including anti-angiogenic, anti-proliferative, and pro-erythropoietic activities although exact cellular target(s) remain unclear. Also, anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-stimulated monocytes (TNF-α is decreased) and costimulatory effects on anti-CD3 stimulated T cells, (enhanced T cell proliferation and proinflammatory cytokine production) are observed These drugs also cause augmentation of NK-cell cytotoxic activity against tumour-cell targets. Having shown that pomalidomide confers T cell-dependant adjuvant-like protection in a preclinical whole tumour-cell vaccine-model, we now show that lenalidomide and pomalidomide strongly inhibit T-regulatory cell proliferation and suppressor-function. Both drugs inhibit IL-2-mediated generation of FOXP3 positive CTLA-4 positive CD25high CD4+ T regulatory cells from PBMCs by upto 50%. Furthermore, suppressor function of pre-treated T regulatory cells against autologous responder-cells is abolished or markedly inhibited without drug related cytotoxicity. Also, Balb/C mice exhibit 25% reduction of lymph-node T regulatory cells after pomalidomide treatment. Inhibition of T regulatory cell function was not due to changes in TGF-β or IL-10 production but was associated with decreased T regulatory cell FOXP3 expression. In conclusion, our data provide one explanation for adjuvant properties of lenalidomide and pomalidomide and suggest that they may help overcome an important barrier to tumour-specific immunity in cancer patients