Fièvre médicamenteuse : un diagnostic à ne pas oublier

International audienc

Clin Pharmacol Ther

Using claims databases of a public healthcare program (Quebec) for the years 2010–2013, we conducted a cohort study of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to describe secondary prevention treatments and determine how they stood against practice guidelines. We compared the risk of death or AIS recurrence over 1 year in patients treated with anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and/or other cardiovascular drugs. In the month after discharge, 44.3% of the patients did not receive the recommended treatment and > 20% did not have any treatment. Untreated patients were younger, had less comorbidities, and a more severe AIS. Anticoagulants and antiplatelets were associated with a reduced risk of death or recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20–0.36 and HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.16–0.38, respectively) compared with the untreated group. Effect size was similar for the other treatments. Findings confirm treatment benefits shown in clinical trials and emphasize the importance of AIS secondary prevention

Safety of Inulin and Sinistrin: Combining Several Sources for Pharmacovigilance Purposes

International audienceIntroduction: Inulin and its analog sinistrin are fructose polymers used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. In 2018, The French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) decided to withdraw products containing sinistrin and inulin due to several reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions, including a fatal outcome.Objective: To assess the safety of inulin and sinistrin use in France.Methods: We searched multiple sources to identify adverse reactions (ARs) to inulin or sinistrin: first, classical pharmacovigilance databases including the French Pharmacovigilance (FPVD) and the WHO Database (VigiBase); second, data from a clinical trial, MultiGFR; third, data regarding current use in an hospital. All potential ARs to inulin or sinistrin were analyzed with a focus on hypersensitivity reactions and relationships to batches of sinistrin.Results: From 1991 to 2018, 134 ARs to inulin or sinistrin were registered in the FPVD or VigiBase. Sixty-three cases (47%) were classified as serious, and 129 cases (96%) were hypersensitivity reactions. We found an association between a batch of sinistrin and the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. During the MultiGFR clinical trial, 7 patients (7/163 participants) had an Adverse reaction; of these, 4 were hypersensitivity reactions including one case of grade 4 anaphylactic shock. In the hospital, no ARs were observed. In the literature, ARs to inulin and sinistrin are very rarely reported and mostly benign.Conclusion: Most ARs to inulin and sinistrin are hypersensitivity reactions that appear to be associated with sinistrin batches

The Role of Therapeutic Leukapheresis in Hyperleukocytotic AML

PURPOSE: Hyperleukocytosis in AML with leukostasis is a serious life-threatening condition leading to a high early mortality which requires immediate cytoreductive therapy. Therapeutic leukapheresis is currently recommended by the American Society of Apheresis in patients with a WBC>100 G/l with signs of leukostasis, but the role of prophylactic leukapheresis before clinical signs of leukostasis occur is unclear. PATIENTS: We retrospectively analyzed the role of leukapheresis in 52 patients (median age 60 years) with hyperleukocytotic AML with and without clinical signs of leukostasis. Since leukapheresis was performed more frequently in patients with signs of leukostasis due to the therapeutic policy in our hospital, we developed a risk score for early death within seven days after start of therapy (ED(d7)) to account for this selection bias and to independently measure the effect of leukapheresis on ED(d7). RESULTS: 20 patients received leukapheresis in combination to chemotherapy compared to 32 patients who received chemotherapy only. In a multivariate logistic regression model for the estimation of the probability of ED(d7) thromboplastin time and creatinine remained as independent significant parameters and were combined to create an ED(d7) risk score. The effect of leukapheresis on EDd7 was evaluated in a bivariate logistic regression together with the risk score. Leukapheresis did not significantly change early mortality in all patients with a WBC≥100 G/l. DISCUSSION: Prophylactic leukapheresis in hyperleukocytotic patients with and without leukostasis did not improve early mortality in our retrospective study. Larger and prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the risk score and to further explore the role of leukapheresis in AML with hyperleukocytosis