A comprehensive review of oral glucosamine use and effects on glucose metabolism in normal and diabetic individuals

Glucosamine (GlcN) is a widely utilized dietary supplement that is used to promote joint health. Reports that oral GlcN supplementation at usual doses adversely affects glucose metabolism in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance have raised concerns that GlcN should be contraindicated in individuals with diabetes and those at risk for developing it. This review addresses its potential, when used at typical doses, to affect glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity in healthy individuals and those with diabetes or ‘pre-diabetes’. Publicly available scientific information and data on GlcN were systematically compiled using the electronic search tool, Dialog®, and reviewed with special emphasis on human studies. In long-term clinical trials, including those containing subjects with type 2 diabetes or ‘pre-diabetes’, GlcN produced a non-significant lowering of fasting blood glucose concentrations in all groups of subjects treated for periods of up to 3 years. Owing to limitations in study design, conclusions based on studies that report adverse affects of GlcN on insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in pre-diabetic subjects are suspect. However, no definitive long-term studies of GlcN use for individuals with pre-diabetes are available. Nevertheless, based on available evidence, we conclude that GlcN has no effect on fasting blood glucose levels, glucose metabolism, or insulin sensitivity at any oral dose level in healthy subjects, individuals with diabetes, or those with impaired glucose tolerance

Radiographic assessment of the femorotibial joint of the CCLT rabbit experimental model of osteoarthritis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purposes of the study were to determine the relevance and validity of in vivo non-invasive radiographic assessment of the CCLT (Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection) rabbit model of osteoarthritis (OA) and to estimate the pertinence, reliability and reproducibility of a radiographic OA (ROA) grading scale and associated radiographic atlas.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In vivo non-invasive extended non weight-bearing radiography of the rabbit femorotibial joint was standardized. Two hundred and fifty radiographs from control and CCLT rabbits up to five months after surgery were reviewed by three readers. They subsequently constructed an original semi-quantitative grading scale as well as an illustrative atlas of individual ROA feature for the medial compartment. To measure agreements, five readers independently scored the same radiographic sample using this atlas and three of them performed a second reading. To evaluate the pertinence of the ROA grading scale, ROA results were compared with gross examination in forty operated and ten control rabbits.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Radiographic osteophytes of medial femoral condyles and medial tibial condyles were scored on a four point scale and dichotomously for osteophytes of medial fabella. Medial joint space width was scored as normal, reduced or absent. Each ROA features was well correlated with gross examination (p < 0.001). ICCs of each ROA features demonstrated excellent agreement between readers and within reading. Global ROA score gave the highest ICCs value for between (ICC 0.93; CI 0.90-0.96) and within (ICC ranged from 0.94 to 0.96) observer agreements. Among all individual ROA features, medial joint space width scoring gave the highest overall reliability and reproducibility and was correlated with both meniscal and cartilage macroscopic lesions (r_s= 0.68 and r_s= 0.58, p < 0.001 respectively). Radiographic osteophytes of the medial femoral condyle gave the lowest agreements while being well correlated with the macroscopic osteophytes (r_s= 0.64, p < 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Non-invasive in vivo radiography of the rabbit femorotibial joint is feasible, relevant and allows a reproducible grading of experimentally induced OA lesion. The radiographic grading scale and atlas presented could be used as a template for in vivo non invasive grading of ROA in preclinical studies and could allow future comparisons between studies.</p

Dose-response efficacy of a new estradiol transdermal matrix patch for 7-day application: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Italian Menopause Research Group.

New estradiol (E2) transdermal matrix patches developed for once-a-week application, releasing 25 micrograms E2 (7D-25) or 50 micrograms E2 (7D-50) daily, were investigated in comparison with a placebo patch and the twice-weekly parent patch releasing 50 micrograms E2 (Derm-50) daily. Three hundred and eleven postmenopausal patients suffering at least seven hot flushes daily were randomly assigned to the four parallel groups and treated continuously for 12 weeks without progestin opposition. The daily number of hot flushes significantly decreased in all groups. At the 12th week the decrease from a base-line average of eight to nine episodes per day was 78% with 7D-25, 93% and 97% respectively with 7D-50 and Derm-50, and significantly (p < 0.001) lower with placebo (59%). Comparable efficacy was observed in terms of severity of hot flushes, Kupperman Index and patient self-rated overall efficacy. Minor systemic adverse events occurred in 10.0%, 8.8%, 16.9% and 13.5% patients in the placebo, 7D-25, 7D-50 and Derm-50 groups respectively. Occasional mild and transient itching and/or erythema at the site of application was reported by a few patients, with no difference between groups or between once-weekly or twice-weekly application. In conclusion all E2 patches were significantly more effective than placebo in relieving climacteric symptoms in a dose-dependent fashion and all were well tolerated

L,5-DIARYL-2-ALKVLPVRROLE-3-SUBSTITUTED NITRO ESTERS, SELECTIVE COX-2 INHIBITORS AND NITRIC OXIDE DONORS

The present invention relates to l,5-diaryl-2-alkylpyrrole-3-substituted nitro esters, of formula (I), which are potent and selective COX-2 inhibitors able to release NO in concentrations that make it possible to counteract the side effects due to selective COX-2 inhibition, without giving rise to hypotensive effects. (I). Where the groups R' and R" are: -H, -F, -CI, -Br, -CH3, -CF3, -OCH3, -SCH3, R1 is methyl, ethyl, trifluoromethyl, hydroxymethyl, methoxymethyl and the substituent in position -3 of the pyrrole ring is a chain, where the groups X, Y, Z, W and R2 are: X is a carbonyl or a group -(CHR3)-, Y is an oxygen atom or the group -NR3- and Z is a carbonyl or a group - (CHR3)-, or a [-CH(COOH)-] group, or a group -(NR3)-, W is an aliphatic chain substituted with one or two (-O-NO2) groups, R2 is: -H, -OH, -OCH3, or -NHR3. R3 is: -H, -CH3, -CH2CH3, [-CH2(CH3)2]. R'" is methylsulphonyl or sulphonamido. The purpose of the invention includes: preparation of the compounds of formula (I), the respective pharmaceutical formulations and use thereof for treating acute and chronic pain, for treating inflammatory disorders and for drug treatment of some forms of tumours

Efficacy on climacteric symptoms of a new estradiol transdermal patch with active matrix in comparison with a reference reservoir patch. Two long-term randomized multicenter parallel-group studies.

METHODS: Two randomized prospective multicentre parallel group studies were performed (one in Germany and the other in Italy) in symptomatic postmenopausal women. The goal was to assess the efficacy on climacteric symptoms and the safety of a new estradiol (CAS 50-28-2) transdermal patch with solid active matrix (SAM) in comparison to a conventional liquid reservoir (LR) type estradiol transdermal patch. Both patches released 50 micrograms/day estradiol. One group of patients received the SAM patch and the other the LR patch in 4-week cycles, with a twice-weekly application of the patches for 3 weeks, followed by one week without patches. Progestin opposition was achieved with medroxyprogesterone acetate 5 mg/day orally in the last 11 days of patch application in the German study and with 10 mg/day in the last 12 days of patch application in the Italian study. Both studies were divided into two Parts: Part 1 with three 4-week cycles for a total of 12 weeks and Part 2 for other ten 4-weeks cycles in which the patches could be applied also continuously. The total duration of the study was therefore 52 weeks. RESULTS: Germany study. 133 patients resulted randomized to the SAM group and 129 to the LR group. Both estradiol patches quickly relieved climacteric symptoms already during the first 3 weeks of patch application, as shown by the rapid decrease of the Kupperman Index. At the end of Part 1, in the SAM group 91% and in the LR group 96% of patients reported relief from climacteric symptoms. At the end of Part 2 the percentages were 98% and 95%, respectively. The two patches were therapeutically equivalent with a power greater than 99.7%. Both patches were systemically fairly well tolerated. Only 4.5% of patients in the SAM group and 3.9% in the LR group discontinued prematurely for possible adverse reactions related to estradiol. There was no significant difference between the two patches with regard to systemic tolerability. Conversely, with regard to local skin reactions, the SAM patch was significantly (p < 0.01) better tolerated than the LR patch. The adhesion to the skin of the SAM patches was better than that of the LR patches. RESULTS. Italian study. 139 patients resulted randomized to the SAM patch and 128 to the LR patch. Also in this study both types of patches relieved the climacteric symptoms already during the first 3 weeks of patch application, as shown by the rapid decrease of the visual analogue scale (VAS) recordings of severity of hot flushes and of sweats. At the end of Part 1 both patches relieved 95% of patients from climacteric symptoms. At the end of Part 2, i.e. after 52 weeks, 100% of patients were relieved from climacteric symptoms. Of these, 72% in the SAM group and 78% in the LR group reported complete disappearance of symptoms. Also in the Italian study, therefore, the two patches were found therapeutically equivalent. Both patches stopped or even reversed bone mineral loss in L2-L4 and had some favorable effects on lipid metabolism. Both patches were systemically equally fairly well tolerated with premature discontinuations for systemic adverse drug reactions in only 5.0% of patients in the SAM group and 3.9% in the LR group. Conversely, as in the German study, the SAM patches were significantly better tolerated by the skin (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The two types of estradiol transdermal patches were equivalent in providing an effective and rapid relief from climacteric symptoms. Systemically both patches were fairly well tolerated. The SAM patches were significantly better tolerated by the skin. The better local tolerability combined with better adhesion and cosmetic properties render the SAM patches very patient friendly and improve the compliance in the long term estrogen replacement therapy required to reduce osteoporosis and cardiovascular risks