8 research outputs found

    Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies

    Get PDF
    Data from two phase 3 studies of eribulin were pooled in analyses initially requested by the European Medicines Agency to assess whether specific patient subgroups, previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane, benefited from eribulin. Study 305/EMBRACE included women after two-to-five lines of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer who were randomized to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or treatment of physician’s choice. In Study 301, patients who had received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease were randomized to eribulin (as above) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14 every 21 days). In the pooled population, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and response rates were analysed in the intent-to-treat population and selected subgroups. Overall, 1,062 patients were randomized to eribulin and 802 patients to control. Median OS was 15.2 months with eribulin versus 12.8 months with control (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95 % CI 0.77, 0.95; P = 0.003). In all subgroups assessed, OS data favoured eribulin; significant improvements occurred in some subgroups, notably in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease (HR 0.82; P = 0.002), although the effect in those with HER2-negative but hormone-receptor-positive disease did not reach statistical significance; benefits were also seen, among others, in those with estrogen-receptor-negative and triple-negative disease. Eribulin improves OS in various patient subgroups with advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane. Women with HER2-negative disease are among those who may obtain benefit from eribulin.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Eribulin monotherapy in patients aged 70 years and older with metastatic breast cancer

    Full text link
    Purpose. Following the demonstrated efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer, an exploratory analysis was performed to investigate the effect of age in these patients. Methods. Data were pooled from two single-arm phase II studiesandoneopen-label randomizedphase III study inwhich patients received eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m2 as 2- to 5- minute intravenous infusions on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The effect of age on median overall survival (OS), progressionfree survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) was calculated for four age groups (<50 years, 50-59 years, 60-69 years,70 years). Results. Overall, 827 patients were included in the analysis (<50 years, n 5 253; 50-59 years, n 5 289; 60-69 years, n5206;70 years, n579). Age had no significant impact on OS (11.8 months, 12.3 months, 11.7 months, and 12.5 months, respectively;p5.82),PFS (3.5months, 2.9months, 3.8months, and 4.0 months, respectively; p 5.42), ORR (12.7%, 12.5%, 6.3%, and 10.1%, respectively), or CBR (20.2%, 20.8%, 20.4%, and 21.5%, respectively). Although some AEs had higher incidence in either the youngest or the oldest subgroup, there was no overall effect of age on the incidence of AEs (including neuropathy, neutropenia, and leukopenia). Conclusion. Eribulin monotherapy in these selected older patients with good baseline performance status led to OS, PFS, ORR, CBR, and tolerability similar to those of younger patients with metastatic breast cancer.The benefits and risks of eribulin appear to be similar across age groups. AlphaMed Press 2014.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): A phase 3 open-label randomised study

    Full text link
    Background: Treatments with survival benefit are greatly needed for women with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eribulin mesilate is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mode of action. We aimed to compare overall survival of heavily pretreated patients receiving eribulin versus currently available treatments. Methods: In this phase 3 open-label study, women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomly allocated (2:1) to eribulin mesilate (1.4 mg/m 2 administered intravenously during 2-5 min on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Patients had received between two and five previous chemotherapy regimens (two or more for advanced disease), including an anthracycline and a taxane, unless contraindicated. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, previous capecitabine treatment, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00388726. Findings: 762 women were randomly allocated to treatment groups (508 eribulin, 254 TPC). Overall survival was significantly improved in women assigned to eribulin (median 13.1 months, 95% CI 11.8-14.3) compared with TPC (10.6 months, 9.3-12.5; hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99; p=0.041). The most common adverse events in both groups were asthenia or fatigue (270 [54%] of 503 patients on eribulin and 98 [40%] of 247 patients on TPC at all grades) and neutropenia (260 [52%] patients receiving eribulin and 73 [30%] of those on TPC at all grades). Peripheral neuropathy was the most common adverse event leading to discontinuation from eribulin, occurring in 24 (5%) of 503 patients. Interpretation: Eribulin showed a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared with TPC in women with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. This finding challenges the notion that improved overall survival is an unrealistic expectation during evaluation of new anticancer therapies in the refractory setting. Funding: Eisai. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Phase II trial of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: New York Cancer Consortium Trial P6205

    Full text link
    Background: Fulvestrant produces a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of ∼45% in tamoxifen-resistant, hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and 32% in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistant disease. The farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib inhibits Ras signaling and has preclinical and clinical activity in endocrine therapy-resistant disease. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib–fulvestrant combination in HR-positive MBC

    Survival benefit of eribulin mesylate in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: what next?

    Full text link
    Eribulin is a synthetic analog of halichondrin B, a non-taxane microtubule inhibitor extracted from the marine sponge, Halichondria okaida. It presents a novel mechanism of action and is active on cancer cells resistant to other antimicrotubule agents. It was granted approval in the USA and Europe for the treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Early trials had shown activity in this setting with main toxicities being neutropenia and neuropathy in patients where quality of life is essential. Approvals were granted after a phase 3 trial demonstrated overall survival benefit in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine, in a setting where most treatments are failing to demonstrate a survival benefit. Recent data suggest that this survival benefit is also consistent in the elderly with no excess toxicity. Future strategies of eribulin are being tested in ongoing trials, evaluating this drug in earlier metastatic lines as well as in the adjuvant and the neoadjuvant settings.Journal ArticleReviewSCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Gene Transfer for Chemoprotection and Enrichment of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

    Full text link
    corecore