214 research outputs found
The Target Silicon Detector for the FOCUS Spectrometer
We describe a silicon microstrip detector interleaved with segments of a
beryllium oxide target which was used in the FOCUS photoproduction experiment
at Fermilab. The detector was designed to improve the vertex resolution and to
enhance the reconstruction efficiency of short-lived charm particles.Comment: 18 pages, 14 figure
Study of Hadronic Five-Body Decays of Charmed Mesons
We study the decay of D+ and Ds+ mesons into charged five body final states,
and report the discovery of the decay mode D+ -> K+K-Pi+Pi+Pi-, as well as
measurements of the decay modes D+ -> K-Pi+Pi+Pi+Pi-, Ds+ -> K+K-Pi+Pi+Pi-, Ds+
-> PhiPi+Pi+Pi- and D+/Ds+ -> Pi+Pi+Pi+Pi-Pi-. An analysis of the resonant
substructure is also included, with evidence suggesting that both decays
proceed primarily through an a1 vector resonance.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figure
A Measurement of the Ds+ Lifetime
A high statistics measurement of the Ds+ lifetime from the Fermilab
fixed-target FOCUS photoproduction experiment is presented. We describe the
analysis of the two decay modes, Ds+ -> phi(1020)pi+ and Ds+ ->
\bar{K}*(892)0K+, used for the measurement. The measured lifetime is 507.4 +/-
5.5 (stat.) +/- 5.1 (syst.) fs using 8961 +/- 105 Ds+ -> phi(1020)pi+ and 4680
+/- 90 Ds+ -> \bar{K}*(892)0K+ decays. This is a significant improvement over
the present world average.Comment: 5 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, submitted to PR
Observation of a 1750 MeV/c^2 Enhancement in the Diffractive Photoproduction of K^+K^-
Using the FOCUS spectrometer with photon beam energies between 20 and 160
\gev, we confirm the existence of a diffractively photoproduced enhancement in
at 1750 \mevcc with nearly 100 times the statistics of previous
experiments. Assuming this enhancement to be a single resonance with a
Breit-Wigner mass shape, we determine its mass to be
\mevcc and its width to be \mevcc. We find no
corresponding enhancement at 1750 \mevcc in , and again neglecting any
possible interference effects we place limits on the ratio . Our results are consistent with previous
photoproduction experiments, but, because of the much greater statistics,
challenge the common interpretation of this enhancement as the
seen in annihilation experiments.Comment: 10 pages, 5 figure
Study of the Cabibbo-suppressed decay modes D0-->Pi-pi+ and D0-->K-K+
Using data from the FOCUS (E831) experiment at Fermilab, we present a new
measurement for the branching ratios of the Cabibbo-suppressed decay modes
D0-->Pi-Pi+ and D0-->K-K+. We measured:
Gamma(D0-->K-K+)/Gamma(D0-->Pi-Pi+) = 2.81 +/- 0.10(stat) +/- 0.06(syst),
Gamma(D0-->K-K+)/Gamma(D0-->K-Pi+) = 0.0993 +/- 0.0014(stat) +/- 0.0014(syst),
and Gamma(D0-->Pi-Pi+)/Gamma(D0-->K-Pi+) = 0.0353 +/- 0.0012 (stat) +/-
0.0006(syst).
These values have been combined with other experimental data to extract the
ratios of isospin amplitudes and the phase shifts for the D-->KK and D-->PiPi
decay channels.Comment: 12 pages, 1 Figure, accepted for publication in Phys.Lett.
Search for and Using Genetic Programming Event Selection
We apply a genetic programming technique to search for the double Cabibbo
suppressed decays and .
We normalize these decays to their Cabibbo favored partners and find
\Lambda_c^+ \to p K^+ \pi^-\Lambda_c^+ \to p K^-
\pi^+ and D_s^+ \to K^+ K^+
\pi^-D_s^+ \to K^+ K^- \pi^+ where
the first errors are statistical and the second are systematic. Expressed as
90% confidence levels (CL), we find and respectively.
This is the first successful use of genetic programming in a high energy
physics data analysis.Comment: 10 page
Measurement of the D+ and Ds+ decays into K+K-K+
We present the first clear observation of the doubly Cabibbo suppressed decay
D+ --> K-K+K+ and the first observation of the singly Cabibbo suppressed decay
Ds+ --> K-K+K+. These signals have been obtained by analyzing the high
statistics sample of photoproduced charm particles of the FOCUS(E831)
experiment at Fermilab. We measure the following relative branching ratios:
Gamma(D+ --> K-K+K+)/Gamma(D+ --> K-pi+pi+) = (9.49 +/- 2.17(statistical) +/-
0.22(systematic))x10^-4 and Gamma(Ds+ --> K-K+K+)/Gamma(Ds+ --> K-K+pi+) =
(8.95 +/- 2.12(statistical) +2.24(syst.) -2.31(syst.))x10^-3.Comment: 10 pages, 8 figure
A Non-parametric Approach to the D+ to K*0bar mu+ nu Form Factors
Using a large sample of D+ -> K- pi+ mu+ nu decays collected by the FOCUS
photoproduction experiment at Fermilab, we present the first measurements of
the helicity basis form factors free from the assumption of spectroscopic pole
dominance. We also present the first information on the form factor that
controls the s-wave interference discussed in a previous paper by the FOCUS
collaboration. We find reasonable agreement with the usual assumption of
spectroscopic pole dominance and measured form factor ratios.Comment: 14 pages, 5 figures, and 2 tables. We updated the previous version by
changing some words, removing one plot, and adding two tables. These changes
are mostly stylisti
Measurements of Six-Body Hadronic Decays of the D^0 Charmed Meson
Using data collected by the FOCUS experiment at Fermilab, we report the
discovery of the decay modes D^0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi+ pi- pi- and D^0 --> pi+ pi+
pi+ pi- pi- pi-. With a sample of 48 +/- 10 reconstructed D^0 --> K- pi+ pi+
pi+ pi- pi- decays and 149 +/- 17 reconstructed D^0 --> pi+ pi+ pi+ pi- pi- pi-
decays, we measure the following relative branching ratios:
The first errors are statistical and the second are systematic. The branching
fraction of the Cabibbo suppressed six-body decay mode is measured to be a
factor of two higher than the branching fraction of the Cabibbo favored
six-body decay mode.Comment: To be submitted to Phys. Lett.
A Study of D0 --> K0(S) K0(S) X Decay Channels
Using data from the FOCUS experiment (FNAL-E831), we report on the decay of
mesons into final states containing more than one . We present
evidence for two Cabibbo favored decay modes, and
, and measure their combined branching fraction
relative to to be = 0.0106
0.0019 0.0010. Further, we report new measurements of
=
0.0179 0.0027 0.0026, = 0.0144 0.0032 0.0016,
and = 0.0208 0.0035 0.0021 where the first error is
statistical and the second is systematic.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figures, typos correcte
- …