2 research outputs found
Metastasis of Solid Tumors in Bone Marrow: A Study from Northern India
The metastasis of bone marrow by the solid tumors is a sign of advanced stage of disease and poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of bone marrow involvement of different solid tumors and their correlation with hematological findings. In a retrospective study we evaluated 434 aspirates and 76 biopsy sections from 124 cases of different types of solid tumors previously diagnosed on the basis of their clinical and histopathological findings. The hematological profile of the patients was done and correlated with the bone marrow findings. The study was carried out at a medical college hospital of northern India. Out of 124 cases of solid tumors 31 (25%) have metastasized to bone marrow. The highest number 25 (36%) of bone marrow involvement was seen in carcinoma prostate followed by gastric carcinoma and melanoma (25%) The least number (14.2%) cases of bone marrow metastasis were observed in endometrial carcinoma. Anemia was found the commonest (71.4%) hematological finding followed by thrombocytopenia in 45.1% cases. The bone marrow examination is an easy, convenient, sensitive and cost effective procedure for assessment of staging and monitoring of prognosis of solid tumors
Apixaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
BACKGROUND:
The efficacy and safety of prolonging prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients beyond hospital discharge remain uncertain. We hypothesized that extended prophylaxis with apixaban would be safe and more effective than short-term prophylaxis with enoxaparin.
METHODS:
In this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned acutely ill patients who had congestive heart failure or respiratory failure or other medical disorders and at least one additional risk factor for venous thromboembolism and who were hospitalized with an expected stay of at least 3 days to receive apixaban, administered orally at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily for 30 days, or enoxaparin, administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg once daily for 6 to 14 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the 30-day composite of death related to venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or asymptomatic proximal-leg deep-vein thrombosis, as detected with the use of systematic bilateral compression ultrasonography on day 30. The primary safety outcome was bleeding. All efficacy and safety outcomes were independently adjudicated.
RESULTS:
A total of 6528 subjects underwent randomization, 4495 of whom could be evaluated for the primary efficacy outcome--2211 in the apixaban group and 2284 in the enoxaparin group. Among the patients who could be evaluated, 2.71% in the apixaban group (60 patients) and 3.06% in the enoxaparin group (70 patients) met the criteria for the primary efficacy outcome (relative risk with apixaban, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.23; P=0.44). By day 30, major bleeding had occurred in 0.47% of the patients in the apixaban group (15 of 3184 patients) and in 0.19% of the patients in the enoxaparin group (6 of 3217 patients) (relative risk, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.02 to 7.24; P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS:
In medically ill patients, an extended course of thromboprophylaxis with apixaban was not superior to a shorter course with enoxaparin. Apixaban was associated with significantly more major bleeding events than was enoxaparin. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00457002.)