24 research outputs found

    Non-academic service quality: comparative analysis of students and faculty as users

    Get PDF
    The research focus was a non-academic service quality assessment within higher education. In particular, non-academic service quality perceptions of faculty and students were evaluated using a service profit chain. This enabled a comparison which helped understanding of non-academic service quality orientation from a key users' perspective. Data were collected using a self-completion questionnaire that was posted on Survey Monkey. A four point Likert scale without a mid-point was used to record respondent perceptions. In total 296 usable questionnaires (192 from students and 104 from faculty) were collected, representing a response rate of 17 percent. Key results indicated that on the whole service users (both faculty and students) were satisfied with non-academic services and this had a positive impact on their loyalty. However, in the case of students, there was a disconnect between loyalty and its 'productive' propagation to the external environment

    Impact of Vincristine-Steroid Pulses in Maintenance for B-Cell Pediatric ALL: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Full text link
    The benefit associated with the incorporation of vincristine-corticosteroid pulses into maintenance therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unclear, particularly in the context of modern intensive therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of reducing frequency of vincristine-steroid pulses during maintenance for newly diagnosed pediatric patients with B-cell ALL. Two authors reviewed all eligible studies identified through a comprehensive search, extracted data from the 25 included publications (12 513 patients), and assessed risk of bias. We created historical and contemporary subgroups; the latter included trials providing a version of Protocol III from early Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster trials and eliminating routine prophylactic cranial radiation. Meta-analysis of event-free survival data suggested no benefit between more frequent or less frequent pulses in contemporary trials (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.85-1.09) which differs significantly from historical trials (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.68-0.91, p=0.04). We found no significant impact of reduced pulse frequency on overall survival or relapse risk. There was however an increased odds of Grade 3+ non-hepatic toxicity in the high pulse frequency group (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.12-1.52). This systematic review suggests that the previous benefit conferred by frequent pulses of vincristine-steroids in maintenance therapy for pediatric B-cell ALL in historical trials no longer applies in contemporary trials but is associated with toxicity. These results will help guide development of the next phase of clinical trials in the field of pediatric ALL and question the continued use of pulses in maintenance for patients not on clinical trials, particularly those experiencing toxicity.</jats:p
    corecore