The effects of multi-domain versus single-domain cognitive training in non-demented older people: a randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Whether healthy older people can benefit from cognitive training (CogTr) remains controversial. This study explored the benefits of CogTr in community dwelling, healthy, older adults and compared the effects of single-domain with multi-domain CogTr interventions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A randomized, controlled, 3-month trial of CogTr with double-blind assessments at baseline and immediate, 6-month and 12-month follow-up after training completion was conducted. A total of 270 healthy Chinese older people, 65 to 75 years old, were recruited from the Ganquan-area community in Shanghai. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: multi-domain CogTr, single-domain CogTr, and a wait-list control group. Twenty-four sessions of CogTr were administrated to the intervention groups over a three-month period. Six months later, three booster training sessions were offered to 60% of the initial training participants. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS, Form A), the Color Word Stroop test (CWST), the Visual Reasoning test and the Trail Making test (TMT) were used to assess cognitive function.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Multi-domain CogTr produced statistically significant training effects on RBANS, visual reasoning, and immediate and delayed memory, while single-domain CogTr showed training effects on RBANS, visual reasoning, word interference, and visuospatial/constructional score (all <it>P </it>< 0.05). At the 12-month posttest, the multi-domain CogTr showed training effects on RBANS, delayed memory and visual reasoning, while single-domain CogTr only showed effects on word interference. Booster training resulted in effects on RBANS, visual reasoning, time of trail making test, and visuospatial/constructional index score.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Cognitive training can improve memory, visual reasoning, visuospatial construction, attention and neuropsychological status in community-living older people and can help maintain their functioning over time. Multi-domain CogTr enhanced memory proficiency, while single-domain CogTr augmented visuospatial/constructional and attention abilities. Multi-domain CogTr had more advantages in training effect maintenance.</p> <p>Clinical Trial Registration</p> <p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-09000732.</p

A complex multimodal activity intervention to reduce the risk of dementia in mild cognitive impairment - ThinkingFit: : pilot and feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial

© 2014 Dannhauser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The version of record, Thomas M. Dannhauser, Martin Cleverly, Tim J. Whitfield, Ben (C) Fletcher, and Tim Stevens, 'A complex multimodal activity intervention to reduce the risk of dementia in mild cognitive impairment - ThinkingFit: pilot and feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial', BMC Psychiatry, 2014, 14: 129, is available online via doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-129Dementia affects 35 million people worldwide and is currently incurable. Many cases may be preventable because regular participation in physical, mental and social leisure activities during middle age is associated with up to 47% dementia risk reduction. However, the majority of middle-aged adults are not active enough. MCI is therefore a clear target for activity interventions aimed at reducing dementia risk. An active lifestyle during middle age reduces dementia risk but it remains to be determined if increased activity reduces dementia risk when MCI is already evident. Before this can be investigated conclusively, complex multimodal activity programmes are required that (1) combine multiple health promoting activities, (2) engage people with MCI, and (3) result in sufficient adherence ratesPeer reviewedFinal Published versio

Methods of Detecting Malingering and Estimated Symptom Exaggeration Base Rates in Australia

Neuropsychology malingering base rates have not been widely investigated in Australia. Estimates in North America vary with as many as 4 in 10 people evaluated for personal injury or compensation cases suspected of exaggerating symptoms. Data on Australian neuropsychology symptom exaggeration base rates were estimated using a modified and expanded version of a survey previously designed for this purpose (Mittenberg, Patton, Canyock, &amp; Condit, 2002). Figures were based on an estimated 1818 annual cases involved in personal injury, (n = 542), disability (n = 109), criminal (n = 108), or medical (n = 1059) matters. Symptom exaggeration base rates associated with referral type and diagnoses were variable. Specifically, 17% of criminal, 13% of personal injury, 13% of disability or workers compensation, and 4% of medical or psychiatric cases were reported to involve symptom exaggeration or probable symptom exaggeration. The highest rates of symptom exaggeration included cases referred for mild head injury (23%), pain or somatoform disorders (15%), moderate to severe head injury (15%), and fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue (15%). Overall, Australian symptom exaggeration base rates reported in this study were lower compared with base rates previously reported in North America