Stress-induced analgesia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and healthy controls

Introduction: Individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain show impairments in their pain-modulatory capacity. Stress-induced analgesia (SIA) is a paradigm of endogenous pain inhibition mainly tested in animals. It has not been tested in patients with chronic pain despite the important role of stress in pain modulation and the chronicity process. Methods: SIA was tested in 22 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and 18 healthy participants matched for age and gender. Pain thresholds, pain tolerance and suprathreshold pain sensitivity were examined before and after a cognitive stressor. Additionally, chronic stress levels, pain catastrophizing and pain characteristics were assessed as potential modulating factors. Results: Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain compared to healthy controls showed significantly impaired SIA (F(1,37)=5.63, p=.02) for pain thresholds, but not pain tolerance (F(1,37)=0.05, p=.83) and stress-induced hyperalgesia (SIH) to suprathreshold pain ratings (F(1,37)=7.76, p=.008). Patients (r(22)=-0.50, p=.05) but not controls (r(18)=-0.39, p=.13) with high catastrophizing had low SIA as assessed by pain thresholds. In controls suprathreshold pain ratings were significantly positively correlated with catastrophizing (r(18)=0.57, p=.03) and life-time stress exposure (r(18)=0.54, p=.03). In patients neither catastrophizing (r(22)=0.21, p=.34) nor stress exposure (r(22)=0.34, p=.34) were associated with suprathreshold SIH. Discussion: Our data suggest impairments of SIA and SIH in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Catastrophizing was associated with deficient SIA in the patients and higher pain ratings in controls. High life time stress also increased pain ratings in the controls

Stress-induced hyperalgesia instead of analgesia in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

Many individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) show impairments in their pain-modulatory capacity. Although stress plays an important role in chronic pain, it is not known if stress-induced analgesia (SIA) is affected in patients with CMP. We investigated SIA in 22 patients with CMP and 18 pain-free participants. Pain thresholds, pain tolerance and suprathreshold pain ratings were examined before and after a cognitive stressor that typically induces pain reduction (SIA). Whereas the controls displayed a significant increase in pain threshold in response to the stressor, the patients with CMP showed no analgesia. In addition, increased pain intensity ratings after the stressor indicated hyperalgesia (SIH) in the patients with CMP compared to controls. An exploratory analysis showed no significant association of SIA or SIH with spatial pain extent. We did not observe significant changes in pain tolerance or pain unpleasantness ratings after the stressor in patients with CMP or controls. Our data suggest that altered stress-induced pain modulation is an important mechanism involved in CMP. Future studies need to clarify the psychobiological mechanisms of these stress-induced alterations in pain processing and determine the role of contributing factors such as early childhood trauma, catastrophizing, comorbidity with mental disorders and genetic predisposition

Einsamkeit während der ersten Welle der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie – Ergebnisse der NAKO-Gesundheitsstudie

Hintergrund: Mit Beginn der SARS-CoV2-Pandemie und der nachfolgenden Maßnahmen zu ihrer Eindämmung im Frühjahr 2020 ist rasch die Frage nach Auswirkungen der Beschränkung sozialer Kontakte auf die psychische Gesundheit der Bevölkerung aufgekommen. Einsamkeit beschreibt eine wahrgenommene Qualität der eigenen Kontakte und Beziehungen zu anderen Menschen. Zahlreiche Studien haben einen Zusammenhang von Einsamkeit mit somatischen und psychischen Erkrankungen aufgezeigt. Ziel: Auswertung der Häufigkeit von Einsamkeit und ihrer Beziehung zu Angst- und Depressionssymptomen in der ersten Welle der Pandemie im Mai 2020. Methoden: Zwischen 2014 und 2019 hat die NAKO-Gesundheitsstudie 205.000 Personen im Alter zwischen 20 und 69 Jahren in 18 Studienzentren in Deutschland rekrutiert und untersucht. Die nachfolgende Zweituntersuchung musste aufgrund der Pandemie im Frühjahr 2020 unterbrochen werden. In dieser Zeit wurde ein COVID-19- bezogener Fragebogen entwickelt und an alle Teilnehmenden verschickt. Ausgewertet wurden die 113.928 Fragebögen, die innerhalb der ersten 30 Tage zurückgeschickt wurden. Einsamkeit wurde mit der 3-Item UCLA Loneliness Scale, Angst und Depression mit den PHQ-9- und GAD-7-Skalen des Patient Health Questionnaire erhoben. Ergebnisse: Im Mai 2020 nahmen sich 31,7 % der NAKO-Teilnehmenden als einsam wahr. Frauen und junge Menschen waren häufiger als Männer und ältere Personen betroffen. Mit steigender Wahrnehmung von Einsamkeit nahm der Schweregrad von Depressions- und Angstsymptomen stetig zu. Einsame Personen während der Pandemie hatten bereits zur NAKO-Basisuntersuchung mehr depressive und Angstsymptome angegeben als NAKO-Teilnehmende, die sich in der Pandemie nicht einsam fühlten. Schlussfolgerung: In der NAKO-Gesundheitsstudie zeigte sich während der ersten Phase der Pandemie eine Zunahme von Einsamkeit und ihr deutlicher Zusammenhang mit schlechterer psychischer Gesundheit

[Physical activity in the German National Cohort (NAKO): use of multiple assessment tools and initial results].

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a complex behavior that is difficult to measure validly and reliably in large, population-based studies. Data on physical activity are available for the initial 100,000 participants of the German National Cohort. OBJECTIVES: To describe the baseline physical activity assessment in the cohort and to present initial descriptive results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Physical activity was assessed using a combination of tools, including two self-administered questionnaires, the Questionnaire on Annual Physical Activity Pattern (QUAP) and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ); a computer-based 24‑h physical activity recall (cpar24); and 7‑day accelerometry (Actigraph GT3X/+; ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA). RESULTS: The availability of data varied between assessment instruments (QUAP: n = 16,372; GPAQ: n = 90,900; cpar24: n = 23,989; accelerometry: n = 35,218). Analyses across measurement tools showed that on average, women spent 75 to 216 min/d, and men spent 73 to 224 min/d in moderate or higher intensity total physical activity. Persons aged 20-39 years spent 66 to 200 min/d, and persons aged 40-69 years spent 78 to 244 min/d in moderate or higher intensity total physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Initial baseline analyses of physical activity in this cohort show the value of using a combination of questionnaires, 24‑h recalls, and a movement sensor. The comprehensive data collection represents a valuable resource for future analyses and will improve our understanding of the association between physical activity and disease prevention