Autophagy pathway upregulation in a human iPSC-derived neuronal model of Cohen syndrome with VPS13B missense mutations

Significant clinical symptoms of Cohen syndrome (CS), a rare autosomal recessive disorder, include intellectual disability, facial dysmorphism, postnatal microcephaly, retinal dystrophy, and intermittent neutropenia. CS has been associated with mutations in the VPS13B (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) gene, which regulates vesicle-mediated protein sorting and transport; however, the cellular mechanism underlying CS pathogenesis in patient-derived neurons remains uncertain. This report states that autophagic vacuoles accumulate in CS fibroblasts and the axonal terminals of CS patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (CS iPSC)-derived neurons; additionally, autophagic flux was significantly increased in CS-derived neurons compared to control neurons. VPS13B knockout HeLa cell lines generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system showed significant upregulation of autophagic flux, indicating that VSP13B may be associated with autophagy in CS. Transcriptomic analysis focusing on the autophagy pathway revealed that genes associated with autophagosome organization were dysregulated in CS-derived neurons. ATG4C is a mammalian ATG4 paralog and a crucial regulatory component of the autophagosome biogenesis/recycling pathway. ATG4C was significantly upregulated in CS-derived neurons, indicating that autophagy is upregulated in CS neurons. The autophagy pathway in CS neurons may be associated with the pathophysiology exhibited in the neural network of CS patients.This work was supported by National Research Foundation (NRF2017R1D1A3B03030972), the National Honor Scientist Program, the Korea Health Technology R&D Project (HI18C0158), and the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (2017M3A9G7073521) to J.-A L

Risk of mortality and clinical outcomes associated with healthcare delay among patients with tuberculosis

Background: To eliminate tuberculosis (TB), World Health Organization (WHO) initiated “The End TB Strategy” with the goal of a 95% reduction in deaths. While many resources are contributed to eradicating TB, a substantial number of TB patients are still unlikely to receive timely treatment. Thus, we aimed to measure healthcare delay and its association with clinical outcomes from 2013 to 2018. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked data of the National Tuberculosis Surveillance Registry and the health insurance claims data of South Korea. We included incident TB patients, and healthcare delay was defined as the period between the first medical visit with TB-related symptoms and the initiation of an anti-TB regimen. We described the distribution of healthcare delay, and the study population was classified into two groups with mean as a cutoff. The association between healthcare delay and clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, pneumonia, progression to multi/extensively drug-resistant, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation use) was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Several stratified and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Results: Among 39,747 patients with pulmonary TB, mean healthcare delay was 42.3 days and delayed and non-delayed groups, classified by mean (or average), were 10,680 (26.9%) and 29,067 (73.1%), respectively. Healthcare delay was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03–1.17), pneumonia (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09–1.18), and mechanical ventilation use (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01–1.32). We also observed the duration-response of healthcare delay. Stratified analyses showed patients with respiratory diseases were at higher risk, and consistent results were observed in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: We observed a substantial number of patients experiencing healthcare delays, and it was associated with the deterioration of clinical outcomes. Our findings suggest that attention from authorities and healthcare professionals is needed to attenuate the preventable burden caused by TB through timely treatment

Cross-linking Zr-based metal-organic polyhedra via postsynthetic polymerization

Metal organic polyhedra (MOPs) have potential as supramolecular building blocks, but utilizing MOPs for postsynthetic polymerization has not been explored. Although MOPs with flexible organic moieties have been recently reported to target enhanced processability, permanent porosity has not been demonstrated. Here, a novel synthetic strategy involving the cross-linking of MOPs via a covalent bond is demonstrated by exploiting a condensation reaction between the MOP and flexible organic linkers. An amine-functionalized Zr-based MOP is cross-linked with acyl chloride linkers in the crystalline state to form cross-linked MOPs. The condensation reaction results in a cross-linked system without significant changes to the structure of the Zr-based MOP. Such cross-linked MOPs provide a microporous tetrahedral cage based on gas sorption analysis. This cross-linking strategy highlights the potential of MOPs as building blocks and provides access to a new class of porous material

Clinical efficacy and safety of interferon (Type I and Type III) therapy in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Interferon (IFN) has been highlighted in several randomized controlled trials as an attractive therapeutic candidate based plausible mode of action, suppressed response in severe COVID-19, and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of IFN in patients with COVID-19 according to clinical severity. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of IFN (systemic or inhaled IFN-α, -β, and -λ) treatment in adult patients with COVID-19 were identified by systematically searching electronic databases until January 2023. Risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, meta-analysis, and certainty of evidence grading were followed for the systematic review. We included 11 trials comprising 6,124 patients. Compared with exclusive standard care or placebo, IFN therapy did not provide significant clinical benefits for mortality at day 28 (pooled risk ratio [RR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-1.18, 9 studies, low-certainty evidence) and progression to mechanical ventilation (pooled RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.81-1.43, 6 studies, low-certainty evidence) in patients with COVID-19. IFN therapy resulted in significantly increased hospital discharge on day 14 relative to the control arm (pooled RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.59). These results were inconsistent compared to other comparable outcomes such as recovery at day 14 and time to clinical improvement. The IFN-treated arm was as safe as the control arm, regardless of clinical severity (pooled RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.64-1.19, 9 studies, low-certainty evidence). In conclusion, IFN therapy was safe but did not demonstrate favorable outcomes for major clinical indices in patients with COVID-19, particularly those with higher than moderate severity. IFN therapy was not associated with worsening outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19. Future clinical trials should evaluate the clinical efficacy of IFN therapy in patients with mild COVID-19 or at an earlier stage. Trial registration: The protocol for this review was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42022301413

Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A living review and meta-analysis.

Inhaled corticosteroids are known to be relatively safe for long-term use in inflammatory respiratory diseases and it has been repurposed as one of the potential therapies for outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, inhaled corticosteroids have not been accepted for COVID-19 as a standard therapy because of its lack of proven benefits. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COVID-19. Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid treatment in patients with COVID-19 were identified through literature electronic database searches up to March 10, 2023. Meta-analyses were conducted for predefined outcomes, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation approach. Overall, seven trials (eight articles) were included in this systematic review. Compared with usual care, inhaled corticosteroids was associated with significantly improved clinical recovery at 7 and 14 days in patients with COVID-19. In subgroup analysis, only budesonide showed significant efficacy in clinical recovery, whereas no significant benefit was observed for ciclesonide. Moreover, inhaled corticosteroids use was not significantly associated with all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, admission to intensive care unit, or the use of mechanical ventilation. Our systematic review used evidence with very low to moderate certainty. Although based on limited evidence, our results suggest that inhaled corticosteroids treatment, especially budesonide, improves the clinical recovery of patients with COVID-19. More trials and meta-analyses are needed to assess the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids for COVID-19 treatment

Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of oral antivirals against SARS-CoV-2 in Korea

OBJECTIVES Many countries have authorized the emergency use of oral antiviral agents for patients with mild-to-moderate cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of these agents for reducing the number of severe COVID-19 cases and the burden on Korea’s medical system. METHODS Using an existing model, we estimated the number of people who would require hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) admission in Korea in 2022. The treatment scenarios included (1) all adult patients, (2) elderly patients only, and (3) adult patients with underlying diseases only, compared to standard care. Based on the current health system capacity, we calculated the incremental costs per severe case averted and hospital admission for each scenario. RESULTS We estimated that 236,510 COVID-19 patients would require hospital/ICU admission in 2022 with standard care only. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (87% efficacy) was predicted to reduce this number by 80%, 24%, and 17% when targeting all adults, adults with underlying diseases, and elderly patients (25, 8, and 4%, respectively, for molnupiravir, with 30% efficacy). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use is likely to be cost-effective, with predicted costs of US$8,878, US$8,964, and US$1,454, per severe patient averted for the target groups listed above, respectively, while molnupiravir is likely to be less cost-effective, with costs of US$28,492, US$29,575, and US$7,915, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In Korea, oral treatment using nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for symptomatic COVID-19 patients targeting elderly patients would be highly cost-effective and would substantially reduce the demand for hospital admission to below the capacity of the health system if targeted to all adult patients instead of standard care

Impact of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection on mortality: A retrospective analysis of nationwide surveillance data

Objectives: It is unclear whether the poor outcome of patients with severe vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection is attributable to vancomycin resistance or to Enterococcus faecium (Efm), which predominates among VRE. Methods: Retrospective study of a prospectively identified cohort from nationwide surveillance. A cohort of consecutive, nonduplicate episodes of monomicrobial bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by Efm in 2016 was selected. The primary outcome was all-cause, 30-day, in-hospital mortality. Inverse probability weighting was applied using the propensity score for vancomycin-resistant Efm (VREfm) BSI. Results: A total of 241 Efm BSI episodes were included, of which 59 (24.5%) were VREfm. Patients with VREfm BSI were younger but had similar comorbidities to those with vancomycin-sensitive Efm (VSEfm) BSI. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that younger age, previous piperacillin-tazobactam use, and steroid use were significant risk factors for VREfm BSI, but 30-day in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between groups (35.6% and 23.6% for VREfm and VSEfm, respectively; odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-3.37; P = 0.101). However, Cox regression with inverse probability weighting revealed that vancomycin resistance was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.62; P = 0.041). Conclusion: In patients with Efm BSI, vancomycin resistance was independently associated with mortality