Spontaneous resolution of thoracic radiation therapy-induced organizing pneumonia: A case series

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 9 patients with organizing pneumonia induced by radiation therapy. Radiation therapy had been administered for breast cancer in 8 patients and for lung cancer in 1 patient. Symptoms were detected in 8 patients; however, none of the patients developed hypoxemia or respiratory failure, and the clinical course was good. Steroid therapy was administered to 3 patients; however, all 3 patients developed recurrence. In contrast, none of the 6 patients who received symptomatic treatment developed recurrence. Steroid treatment is often provided for patients with organizing pneumonia; however, the effect of steroid administration on recurrence rate needs to be examined. In addition, none of the patients died and only 1 patient with lung cancer required mechanical ventilation. Therefore, considering the serious side effects of steroid use, initial symptomatic treatment, and not steroid administration, may be best for patients. One exception would be for patients with hypoxemia or those whose symptoms adversely affect the activities of daily living. The incidence of radiation therapy-induced organizing pneumonia in lung cancer patients is higher and its severity is greater than that in breast cancer patients; however, the time to onset may be longer in lung cancer patients. Therefore, more attention should be paid towards the diagnosis and treatment of radiation therapy-induced organizing pneumonia in patients with lung cancer as compared to that in patients with breast cancer

Analysis of Inhaled Corticosteroid Selection in Patients with Bronchial Asthma Using a Questionnaire Survey—Effects of Age, Gender, and Disease Severity—

Background: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) has played an important role in the management of asthma. Although several kinds of ICSs are currently available, there is no established strategy for ICS selection. Methods: Using the data from the 2004 questionnaire surveys by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group, we analyzed relationships between each patient and the ICS employed on the basis of patient background, asthma control and treatment, and indicated characteristics of ICS selection by the physician. Results: Of 2852 cases, 2279 (79.9%) were ICS users, and 1513 (66.4% of ICS users) were classified as being in the fluticasone propionate (FP) group, 438 (19.2%) in the budesonide (BUD) group, and 240 (10.5%) in the hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone (HFA-BDP) group, indicating that FP was a standard ICS in this study. The mean age was significantly lower in the BUD group (52.3+/−18.2 years) and was significantly higher in the HFA-BDP group (59.9+/−17.0 years) than that in the FP group (55.8+/−16.6 yaers). The proportion of female patients was significantly higher not in the HFA-BDP (46.5%) but in the BUD group (59.0%) than in the FP group (51.1%). These results indicated that BUD was frequently prescribed to young female and HFA-BDP was employed in the elderly patients irrespective of gender compared with FP. Conclusions: Our study indicates that ICS selection is reasonably adapted to each patient's background at least in the surveyed area. We need to elucidate the characteristics of ICS selection further in the future as new ICS and devices are developed