Surgical Algorithm for Neuroma Management: A Changing Treatment Paradigm

Successful treatment of the painful neuroma is a particular challenge to the nerve surgeon. Historically, symptomatic neuromas have primarily been treated with excision and implantation techniques, which are inherently passive and do not address the terminal end of the nerve. Over the past decade, the surgical management of neuromas has undergone a paradigm shift synchronous with the development of contemporary techniques aiming to satisfy the nerve end. In this article, we describe the important features of surgical treatment, including the approach to diagnosis with consideration of neuroma type and the decision of partial versus complete neuroma excision. A comprehensive list of the available surgical techniques for management following neuroma excision is presented, the choice of which is often predicated upon the availability of the terminal nerve end for reconstruction. Techniques for neuroma reconstruction in the presence of an intact terminal nerve end include hollow tube reconstruction and auto- or allograft nerve reconstruction. Techniques for neuroma management in the absence of an intact or identifiable terminal nerve end include submuscular or interosseous implantation, centro-central neurorrhaphy, relocation nerve grafting, nerve cap placement, use of regenerative peripheral nerve interface, “end-to-side” neurorrhaphy, and targeted muscle reinnervation. These techniques can be further categorized into passive/ablative and active/reconstructive modalities. The nerve surgeon must be aware of available treatment options and should carefully choose the most appropriate intervention for each patient. Comparative studies are lacking and will be necessary in the future to determine the relative effectiveness of each technique

Reconstruction of Lumbar Spinal Defects: Case Series, Literature Review, and Treatment Algorithm

Background:. Lumbar spinal defects present a distinct challenge for the reconstructive surgeon and are often complicated by previous spinal surgery, the presence of hardware, and prior radiation. There are a variety of reconstructive options described but no clear treatment algorithm for these challenging defects. Methods:. A literature search was performed to review the described treatment options for lumbar spinal soft-tissue defects. Treatments for myelomeningocele or pressure ulcers were excluded. In addition, a retrospective case review was performed for patients with lumbar defects treated with pedicled superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap reconstruction. Results:. A literature review revealed 2,022 articles pertaining to lumbar defect reconstruction, of which 56 met inclusion criteria. These articles described 13 individual reconstructive techniques for this anatomic area. The most commonly described techniques were evaluated and a treatment algorithm designed based on patient and wound characteristics. The clinical course of 5 patients with radiated lumbar spinal defects treated with SGAP flaps is presented. Conclusions:. There are many treatment options for lumbar spinal defects and treatment should be tailored to the patient and the characteristics of the defect. For large or radiated lumbar wounds, the pedicled SGAP flap is an excellent reconstructive choice, as it has reliable anatomy that is outside the zone of injury, adequate bulk, and minimal donor-site deficits

Intravenous Drug Use–Related Complications of the Hand and Upper Extremity

Background:. In the last decade, there has been an increase in intravenous drug use (IVDU) and associated medical problems. Users commonly inject into their upper extremities, which can result in infection and other sequelae in this area. The goal of this study was to compare demographics and treatment for upper extremity infections between intravenous drug users and non-intravenous drug users over the past 10 years at 1 level I emergency department (ED). Methods:. This was a retrospective case–control study. All patients presenting to the ED with an upper extremity infection in 2005, 2010, and 2015 were identified using the ninth revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients with an IVDU-related infection were identified by manually reviewing the medical record and matched with patients with non-IVDU–related infection on demographics. Patient-related factors, infection specifics, and treatment parameters were compared in both groups. Results:. The number of IVDU-related upper extremity infection cases presenting to the ED increased 126% over the 10-year period (65 cases in 2005, 109 cases in 2010, and 147 cases in 2015). The location of infection in the IVDU group was more likely to be in a typical injection site (forearm, P < 0.001; wrist, P = 0.002), and IVDU patients had 33% more hospital admissions and stayed in the hospital longer (3 days versus 0.59; P < 0.001). These patients also were more likely to have a computed tomography scan (P < 0.001) and have Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (P = 0.009). Conclusions:. Over a 10-year period, the number of IVDU-related upper extremity infections more than doubled, with more severe infections that underwent advanced imaging and intensive treatment

Three Useful Tips and Tricks for Intraoperative Nerve Stimulation

Summary:. Disposable handheld nerve stimulators are widely used in peripheral nerve surgery. Such devices stimulate a motor nerve or the motor component of a mixed nerve by applying electrical current to the proximal region, targeting the main nerve trunk. This stimulation then travels along the motor nerve, reaching the distal end to control the corresponding muscle(s). In this study, the authors demonstrate three useful tips and tricks for handheld nerve stimulation during targeted muscle reinnervation and peripheral nerve surgery. The three tips are (1) identification of proximal muscle contraction by retrograde electrical stimulation of a distal sensory nerve; (2) graded stimulation for identifying motor nerves within fibrotic scarred tissue beds or parallel to the major motor/mixed nerve of interest; and (3) proximal stimulation for validation of adequate post-targeted muscle reinnervation coaptation(s)

Nerve Diameter in the Hand: A Cadaveric Study

Background:. Nerve injuries in the hand are common and often pose a challenge for the upper extremity surgeon. A range of reconstructive options exist for nerve repair, but proper matching of nerve diameter is important for many of these techniques. The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the nerve diameters of the hand and their relative differences and (2) investigate whether there is a relationship between nerve diameter and external hand dimensions or body mass index. Methods:. We utilized 18 freshly frozen cadaveric hands from adult donors aged 20–86 of both sexes for this study. Two independent observers measured each nerve diameter to the nearest 0.1 mm using a digital caliper. Results:. Using the flexor zones as boundaries, a total of 33 nerve measurements were performed for each cadaveric hand. Nerve diameter increased from the distal to the proximal flexor zones. The internal common digital nerves in flexor zone 3 were larger than the external digital nerves. The median nerve was found to be nearly 2 times larger than the ulnar nerve at 2 locations within the wrist. There was a positive correlation between body mass index, hand span, hand width, and nerve diameter at several measured locations. Conclusions:. This study provides reference values for nerve diameters of the hand and wrist and describes their relative differences. It is important for surgeons to be aware of these differences and to consider this information as we advance our efforts to reconstruct the hand and develop technologies for nerve repair

A Consensus Approach for Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Amputees

Amputations have been performed with few modifications since the dawn of surgery. Blood vessels are ligated, bones are shortened, and nerves are cut. In a percentage of people, this can result in severe neuropathic, residual limb, and phantom limb pain. Targeted muscle reinnervation is a surgical procedure initially conceived to optimize function for myoelectric prostheses in amputees. Recently, it has been adopted more widely by surgeons for the prevention and treatment of neuropathic pain. Perhaps as a function of its relatively recent development, many authors perform this operation differently, and there has been no overall agreement regarding the principles, indications, technical specifics, and postoperative management guidelines. This article is written as a consensus statement by surgeons focused on the treatment of neuropathic pain and those with extensive experience performing targeted muscle reinnervation. It is designed to serve as a roadmap and template for extremity surgeons to consider when performing targeted muscle reinnervation