2 research outputs found

    The use of chimeric-superthin anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of laryngopharyngoesophagectomy defects of hypopharyngeal cancer

    No full text
    IntroductionDue to 3D defects after resection of hypopharyngeal cancers, free flaps have become as first option for reconstruction and the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) has been chosen frequently for soft tissue defects. Chimerization of the skin island of the ALT is also possible which can result in reconstruction of multiple defects simultaneously and monitorization of buried flaps. However, ALT can be bulky in some patients. The superthin ALT is well established by some authors especially for extremities but there is no study about the use of this modification in pharyngoesophageal defects. We present our experience of using chimeric-superthin ALT for pharyngoesophageal reconstructions. Patients and MethodsBetween 2019 and 2022, six patients (one female and five male) underwent hypopharyngeal tumor resection and experienced chimeric-superthin ALT flap reconstructions. Patients' ages were ranged between 53 and 71 (mean: 64) years old. The type of tumor was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) for all patients. Three patients had total and three patients had 75% of pharyngoesophageal defects. Defect size was between 10 x 7 cm and 12 x 8.5 cm (mean: 87.08 cm(2)). All flaps were harvested as 5 mm thickness with two skin perforators. All flaps were divided into two individual skin islands as chimeric fashion. One of the skin islands was used for esophageal reconstruction and the other was used for both flap monitorization and tensionless closure of anterior neck skin. ResultsTotal flap size was between 18 x 9 cm and 21 x 11 cm (mean: 200 cm(2)). In two patients, anastomoses were performed to pectoral branch of thoracoacromial vessels. Neck vessels were chosen as recipient for remaining patients. Wound dehiscence occurred in two patients between the neck skin and monitor island and was re-sutured without any problems. There was no partial or total flap necrosis and all flaps survived. The follow up period was between 4 and 9 months (mean: 5.6). All patients had a successful functional outcome as swallowing. ConclusionThe superthin-chimeric ALT flap is a useful option when classical ALT is bulky in defects of hypopharyngeal cancer

    Comparison of Current Free Flap Options for Intraoral Lining and Tongue Reconstruction

    No full text
    Free flaps have become the main alternative for intraoral reconstruction in current practice. However, controversy exists on pros and cons of different free flap options for this challenging area. Although there are various studies focusing on different free flap options, comparative studies are very few and there is not a single study comparing all 4 thin free flap options for intraoral reconstruction. Between 2018 and 2021, 30 patients underwent intraoral reconstruction. Four pliable and thin flaps, medial sural artery perforator flap, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap, radial forearm free flap, and superthin anterolateral thigh flap were used for reconstructions and compared per functionality and patients' quality of life. One medial sural artery perforator flap and 1 superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap failed because of perfusion problems, and the remaining flaps survived. Harvest time and donor site closure were with significant difference (P<0.05) between groups. Quality of life results were similar except one of the disease-specific questions. In authors' opinion, anterolateral thigh flap is the best option in normal-weight individuals because of its reliability, pliability, and constant reliable vascular structure. Although other options may be considered in overweighted patients, thinly elevated anterolateral thigh flap still seems to be the most reliable option
    corecore