6 research outputs found

    Sprawozdanie z XV Zjazdu Polskiego Towarzystwa Chirurgii Onkologicznej

    Get PDF

    Aesthetic outcome after breast conserving surgery and either intraoperative radiotherapy or whole breast external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer: Objective assessment of patients in a randomized controlled trial in Lublin, Poland

    Get PDF
    The international randomized controlled TARGIT A (TARGeted Intraoperative radiotherapy) trial demonstrated non-inferiority between the technique of TARGIT (Intra-Operative RadioTherapy (IORT) with Intrabeam®) and whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as part of the treatment for women with early breast cancer. The aim of this sub-study was to see if the single high dose of IORT leads to impaired aesthetic outcome in a group of patients participating in the trial at a single site. Frontal digital photographs were taken of women and analyzed, blinded to treatment received, by BCCT.core software. This produced scores for various measures of color. 29 women (16 EBRT, 13 IORT) between 49 to 79 years old had photographs taken at baseline (up to 2 days prior to surgery), and again at 12 months (median 364 days). At 12 months there was a significant difference in cEMDL (p=0.002, Wilcoxon Two-Sample test, 2-sided) and other measures, indicating more “redness” in the breasts of the women in the EBRT group compared with the IORT group. This difference persisted after adjusting for tumor size, body mass index and age (p=0.0198, multiple regression analysis). This study provides further evidence for the early beneficial effect of TARGIT on aesthetic outcome

    Altered tissue electrical properties in women with breast cancer – Preliminary observations.

    No full text
    Introduction and objectives: In the United States, breast cancer (BC) is the most common non-skin cancer. In Poland, it is estimated that the number of new breast cancer cases affects about 13,500 women each year. There are many methods for nutritional status assessment. One of them is bioimpedance analysis (BIA). Direct bioimpedance measures (resistance, reactance, phase angle (PA)) determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) detectf changes in tissue electrical properties. The study was conducted to investigate whether there are any tissue electrical differences in patients with breast cancer. Materials and methods: The direct bioimpedance measures determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were performed on 34 patients with BC and 34 healthy volunteers. The measurements were made with ImpediMed bioimpedance analysis SFB7 BioImp v1.55 (Pinkenba Qld 4008, Australia). Results: Reactance and resistance at 50 kHz was found to be significantly greater in patients with BC than in the control group (53.59° ± 1.53 vs. 47.26° ± 1.25, respectively, p=0.0031; 603.24° ± 15.38 ohm vs. 515.87° ± 11.48 ohm, respectively, p=0.00004). Conclusion: Pre-surgical patients diagnosed with BC have altered tissue electrical properties. Further observations of a larger patient group would be valuable to calculate survival, validate the prognostic significance of PA, and monitor nutritional and therapeutic interventions in this patient population
    corecore