Association of the 24‐Hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale After Mechanical Thrombectomy With Early and Long‐Term Survival

Background The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) obtained 24 hours after ischemic stroke is a good indicator for functional outcome and early mortality, but the correlation with long‐term survival is less clear. We analyzed the correlation of the NIHSS after 24 hours (24h NIHSS) and early clinical neurological development after mechanical thrombectomy with early and long‐term survival as well as its predictive power on survival. Methods We reviewed a prospective observational registry for all patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between January 2010 and December 2018. Vital status was extracted from the Swiss Population Registry. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and crude hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression. To assess predictive power of the 24h NIHSS, different Random Survival Forest models were evaluated. Results We included 957 patients (median follow‐up 1376 days). Patients with lower 24h NIHSS and major early neurological improvement had substantially better survival rates. We observed significantly higher aHR for death in patients with 24h NIHSS 12 to 15 (aHR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.1–2.89), with 24h NIHSS 16 to 21 (aHR, 2.54, 95% CI, 1.59–4.06), and with 24h NIHSS >21 (aHR, 5.74; 95% CI, 3.47–9.5). The 24h NIHSS showed the best performance predicting mortality (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve at 3 months [0.85±0.034], at 1 year [0.82±0.029], at 2 years [0.82±0.031], and at 5 years [0.83±0.035]), followed by NIHSS change. Conclusions Patients with acute ischemic stroke achieving a low 24h NIHSS or major early neurological improvement after mechanical thrombectomy had markedly lower long‐term mortality. Furthermore, 24h NIHSS had the best predictive power for early and long‐term survival in our machine learning–based prediction

Diagnostic Accuracy of High-Resolution 3D T2-SPACE in Detecting Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Assessment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis on MR imaging can be challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution 3D T2 sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) in patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and to compare its performance with contrast-enhanced 3D T1-MPRAGE. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a blinded retrospective analysis of T2-SPACE and contrast-enhanced MPRAGE sequences from patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and a control group. The results were compared with a reference standard, which was based on all available sequences and clinical history. Subanalyses were performed according to the venous segment involved and the clinical stage of the thrombus. RESULTS Sixty-three MR imaging examinations from 35 patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 51 examinations from 40 control subjects were included. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity calculated from the initial MR imaging examination for each patient were 100% each for T2-SPACE and 95%, 91%, and 98%, respectively, for contrast-enhanced MPRAGE. The interrater reliability was high for both sequences. In the subanalysis, the accuracy for each venous segment involved and if subdivided according to the clinical stage of thrombus was ≥95% and ≥85% for T2-SPACE and contrast-enhanced MPRAGE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Both T2-SPACE and contrast-enhanced MPRAGE offer high accuracy for the detection and exclusion of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; however, T2-SPACE showed a better overall performance and thus could be a useful tool if included in a multiparametric MR imaging protocol for the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, especially in scenarios where gadolinium administration is contraindicated