Understanding the Socioeconomic and Health Challenges of the Medicaid Expansion Population in Oregon.

Following the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Medicaid eligibility in the United States expanded to include low-income adults. One key challenge for organizations and providers serving the Medicaid population was predicting if and how this change would alter the composition of enrollees. This study characterized demographics, socioeconomic challenges, and health of the expansion and non-expansion Medicaid populations in a metropolitan area in Oregon using a survey and Medicaid claims. Results showed that the expansion population has more men and non-English speakers than the non-expansion population. They also have greater education and employment, but face similar socioeconomic challenges including struggling to meet basic needs and housing instability. This study also found comparable self-reported physical and mental health, but lower prevalence of physical or mental health diagnoses and several ambulatory care reactive conditions including hypertension, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. The authors concluded that expansion and non-expansion populations differ in sex, language, education, employment, and health, but they face similar socioeconomic challenges. This information is useful for organizations coordinating and providing care to Medicaid members so they can understand the needs of the population and set appropriate population health management strategies

Identifying underlying constructs of childhood adversity in a low-income population.

BACKGROUND: Extensive research has documented the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and poor outcomes later in life, as well as the high prevalence of ACEs in the American population. Studies consistently find that over half of American adults have experienced at least one ACE. Despite this, research on the long-term impacts of ACEs is challenging due to the complex nature of adversity. OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to define underlying constructs of adversity, and explore how they changed throughout childhood, in a low-income population. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: We fielded a survey to Medicaid-enrolled adults in the Portland, OR metropolitan area. METHODS: Our survey captured different experiences in childhood, including relationships and support, educational challenges, housing and employment stability, neighborhood environment, discrimination, abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction; questions were asked for 6-12 and 13-18 years of age. We then used factor analysis to identify underlying constructs of adversity in the two age ranges. RESULTS: We identified two factors - Inadequate Emotional Support and Instability - in each age range. Inadequate Emotional Support remained consistent in both time periods while the Instability factor changed, expanding from household-centric experiences in childhood to a wider variety of experiences in adolescence. Additionally, a number of variables did not load on either factor in either age range. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the importance of expanding how we think about instability specifically, and childhood adversity in general