SN1998bw: The Case for a Relativistic Shock

SN1998bw shot to fame by claims of association with GRB980425. Independent of its presumed association with a GRB, this SN is unusual in its radio properties. A simple interpretation of the unusually bright radio emission leads us to the conclusion that there are two shocks in this SN: a slow moving shock containing most of the ejecta and a relativistic shock (Gamma=2) which is responsible for the radio emission. This is the first evidence for the existence of relativistic shocks in supernovae. It is quite plausible that this shock may produce high energy emission (at early times and by inverse Compton scattering). As with other supernovae, we expect radio emission at much later times powered primarily by the slow moving ejecta. This expectation has motivated us to continue monitoring this unusual SN.Comment: A&A (in press), Rome GRB Symposium, Nov. 199

A Radio Flare from GRB 020405: Evidence for a Uniform Medium Around a Massive Stellar Progenitor

We present radio observations of GRB 020405 starting 1.2 days after the burst, which reveal a rapidly-fading ``radio flare''. Based on its temporal and spectral properties, we interpret the radio flare as emission from the reverse shock. This scenario rules out a circumburst medium with a radial density profile \rho ~ r^{-2} expected around a mass-losing massive star, since in that case the reverse shock emission decays on the timescale of the burst duration t~100 s. Using published optical and X-ray data, along with the radio data presented here, we further show that a self-consistent model requires collimated ejecta with an opening angle of 6 degrees (t_j~0.95 days). As a consequence of the early jet break, the late-time (t>10 days) emission measured with the Hubble Space Telescope significantly deviates from an extrapolation of the early, ground-based data. This, along with an unusually red spectrum, F_\nu \~ \nu^{-3.9}, strengthens the case for a supernova that exploded at about the same time as GRB 020405, thus pointing to a massive stellar progenitor for this burst. This is the first clear association of a massive progenitor with a uniform medium, indicating that a \rho ~ r^{-2} profile is not a required signature, and in fact may not be present on the lengthscales probed by the afterglow in the majority of bursts.Comment: Submitted to ApJ; 14 pages, 2 tables, 3 figure