Impediments affect deer foraging decisions and sapling performance

Impediments, such as tree logs, can prevent access to saplings for deer, and can increase perceived predation risk by blocking view and escape possibilities for deer in areas with large carnivores. Therefore, impediments can influence deer foraging decisions and the trade-off between safety and food of different quality indirectly influencing tree regeneration. The aim of our study was to test how the presence of an impediment affects deer foraging behavior and tree sapling performance of eight species that differ in preference by deer. We planted saplings without, nearby and inside impediments and followed their fate for three consecutive years in Białowieża forest, Poland. We constructed 1 m high impediments of 5 × 5 m that would still allow deer to enter the impediment and forage from the saplings planted inside. However, we never recorded deer inside the impediments. Near the impediments deer visitation rate and cumulative visitation time was reduced. As a result, browsing intensity of all tree species was lower nearby and especially inside the impediment. Deer did not select different tree species without, near or inside the impediment. Due to the overall lower browsing intensity, tree saplings increased in height near the impediment and heights increased significantly within the impediment. The palatable, but browsing intolerant, Acer platanoides benefited most from the impediment as this species was highly selected and heavily browsed without an impediment. Followed by the palatable, but more browse tolerant Tilia cordata and Pyrus pyraster. In comparison, the presence of an impediment had a smaller effect on the less preferred Alnus glutinosa, Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris which survived well without an impediment. Our study showed that impediments modified deer behavior as they visited these plots less frequently and thereby indirectly reduced the browsing impact on the preferred tree species. Therefore, the potential for successful recruitment of preferred tree species is higher near an impediment, and especially when surrounded by impediment structures. In the long-term, the presence of natural impediments like tree logs allows browsing intolerant tree species to escape browsing, ultimately leading to a more diverse forest composition

Recreation and hunting differentially affect deer behaviour and sapling performance

Humans are increasingly acknowledged as apex predators that shape landscapes of fear to which herbivores adapt their behaviour. Here, we investigate how humans modify deer space-use and their effects on vegetation at two spatial scales; zones with different types of human use (largescale risk factor) and, nested within that, trails (fine-scale risk factor). In zones with three contrasting types of human activities: 1) no recreation, no hunting, 2) with recreation, no hunting and 3) with recreation and hunting, we linked deer space-use (dropping counts) to browsing intensity, relative growth and survival of planted saplings. Plots were located at two distances to trails (20 versus 100 m) to test how trails affect deer space-use and sapling performance. Additionally, plots were distributed over forest and heathland as risk effects are habitat-dependent. Deer space-use was highest in the zone without recreation or hunting, resulting in higher browsing levels and lower sapling growth and survival, but only in heathland. In contrast, deer space-use and sapling performance did not differ between zones with recreation only and zones with recreation and hunting. Deer dropping counts were lower near trails used for recreation, but this was not associated with browsing impact or sapling performance. Our results show that recreational use modifies deer space-use which is associated with browsing impact on woody vegetation, while seasonal hunting activities in zones with recreation did not have additive year-round effects. Yet, effects were only observed at the larger scale of recreation zones and not near trails. Furthermore, deer space-use was only associated with sapling performance in open heathland, where high visibility presumably increases avoidance behaviour because it increases detectability and decreases escape possibilities. This suggests that recreation creates behaviourally mediated cascading effects that influence vegetation development, yet these effects are context-dependent. We advocate incorporating human-induced fear effects in conservation, management and research