Intranasal breast milk for premature infants with severe intraventricular hemorrhagean observation

For nasal application of neurotrophins and mesenchymal stem cells, successful delivery to the brain and therapeutic effects are known from experimental data in animals. Human breast milk contains neurotrophins and stem cells, but gavage tube feeding in preterm infants bypasses the naso-oropharynx. This is a first exploration on additional nasal breast milk and neuromorphological outcome after severe neonatal brain injury. We present a retrospective summary of 31 very low birth weight preterm infants with intraventricular hemorrhage degrees 3/4 from one third-level neonatal center. All were breast milk fed. Sixteen infants additionally received nasal drops of fresh breast milk daily with informed parental consent for at least 28days. Cerebral ultrasound courses were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist blinded to the intervention. The main outcome measure was severity of porencephalic defects before discharge. Clinical covariates were comparable in both groups. With nasal breast milk, a trend to a lower incidence for severe porencephalic defects (21% vs. 58%) was detected. Incidences were lower for progressive ventricular dilatation (71% vs. 91%) and surgery for posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (50% vs. 67%).Conclusion: The hypothesis is generated that early intranasal application of breast milk could have a beneficial effect on neurodevelopment in preterm infants. Controlled investigation is needed.What is Known:center dot Successful delivery to the brain and therapeutic effects are known for nasal application of neurotrophins and mesenchymal stem cells from experimental data in animal studies.center dot Human breast milk contains neurotrophins and stem cells, but gavage tube feeding in preterm infants bypasses the naso-oropharynx.What is New:center dot This is the first report on additional nasal breast milk application in very low birth weight preterm infants with severe brain injury observing a trend for less severe porencephalic defects.center dot The hypothesis is generated that nasal breast milk might exert neuroprotective effects in preterm infants

Intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil and Heparin to Prevent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

Purpose: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the major cause for surgical failure after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). So far, no therapy has been proven to prevent PVR. Promising results for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk eyes have been reported previously. The objective of this trial was to examine the effect of adjuvant intravitreal therapy with 5-FU and LMWH compared with placebo on incidence of PVR in high-risk patients with primary RRD. Design: Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter, interventional trial with 1 interim analysis. Participants: Patients with RRD who were considered to be at high risk for PVR were included. Risk of PVR was assessed by noninvasive aqueous flare measurement using laser flare photometry. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to verum (200 mg/ml 5-FU and 5 IU/ml dalteparin) and placebo (balanced salt solution) intravitreally applied during routine pars plana vitrectomy. Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point was the development of PVR grade CP (full-thickness retinal folds or subretinal strands in clock hours located posterior to equator) 1 or higher within 12 weeks after surgery. For grading, an end point committee assessed fundus photographs. Secondary end points included bestcorrected visual acuity and redetachment rate. A group sequential design with 1 interim analysis was applied using the O'Brien and Fleming boundaries. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade CP incidence was compared using a Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by surgeon. Results: A total of 325 patients in 13 German trial sites had been randomized (verum, n = 163; placebo, n = 162). In study eyes, mean laser flare was 31 +/- 26 pc/ms. No significant difference was found in PVR rate. Primary analysis in the modified intention-to-treat population results were: verum 28% vs. placebo 23% (including not assessable cases as failures); odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-2.08; P = 0.77. Those in the per-protocol population were: 12% vs. 12%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.47-2.34; P = 0.47. None of the secondary end points showed any significant difference between treatment groups. During the study period, no relevant safety risks were identified. Conclusions: Rate of PVR did not differ between adjuvant therapy with 5-FU and LMWH and placebo treatment in eyes with RRD. (C) 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmolog