Ferumoxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in pre-operative assessment for colorectal liver metastases

Aim: The objective was to evaluate whether contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques used in a pre-operative assessment protocol for colorectal liver metastases are as accurate as spiral computer tomography during arterial portography (CTAP). Pre-operative accuracy and clinical consequences of MRI are described and compared with CTAP. Moreover, post-operative survival rate and tumour recurrence were studied. Methods: The study group comprised 84 patients which were possible candidates for a partial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Patients were pre-operatively evaluated by CT of the abdomen, CT of the thorax and spiral CTAP and ferumoxide-enhanced MRI was performed in routine way for all patients. Following this selection, 35 patients underwent a partial hepatectomy with curative intent. All patients were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Ferumoxide-enhanced MRI proved to be at least as accurate as spiral CTAP in 81% of patients. In nine patients (11%) spiral CTAP revealed more intrahepatic lesions than MRI; in only two patients (2%) did these foundings influenced the clinical decision. These patients were considered to have irresectable disease. In seven patients (8%) MRI detected more lesions than spiral CTAP and influenced the clinical decision in three patients (4%) and these did not undergo a laparotomy. The actuarial 3 year overall survival of operated patients was 41% and the actuarial 3 year disease-free survival was 19%. Conclusion: Evaluation of the clinical impact of a pre-operative assessment protocol extended with ferumoxide MRI techniques demonstrated that this non-invasive MRI technique is safe and at least as accurate as spiral CTAP. This MRI technique results in comparable clinical decisions and outcome after hepatectomy. We suggest that the performance of routine contrast-enhanced MRI should instead be used in the pre-operative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd

The value of ultrasound with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy compared to computed tomography in the detection of regional metastases in the clinically negative neck

PURPOSE: Head and neck oncologists have not reached consensus regarding the role of contemporary imaging techniques in the evaluation of the clinically negative neck in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy of ultrasound with guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (UGFNAB) and computed tomography (CT) in detecting lymph node metastasis in the clinically negative neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-four neck sides of patients with HNSCC were examined preoperatively by ultrasound/UGFNAB and CT at one of five participating tertiary care medical centers. The findings were correlated with the results of histopathologic examination of the neck specimen. RESULTS: Ultrasound with guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy was characterized by a sensitivity of 48%, specificity of 100%, and overall accuracy of 79%. Three cases had nondiagnostic aspirations using UGFNAB and were excluded. CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 92%, and overall accuracy of 77%. UGFNAB detected two additional metastases not visualized on CT, whereas CT detected no metastases not seen on UGFNAB. The results of UGFNAB were similar between the participating centers. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one half of the clinically occult nodal metastases in our patient group were identified by both CT and UGFNAB. Overall, UGFNAB and CT demonstrated comparable accuracy. The sensitivity of CT was slightly better than UGFNAB, but the latter remained characterized by a superior specificity. The results of CT and UGFNAB did not appear to be supplementary. The choice of imaging modality for staging of the clinically negative neck depends on tumor site, T-stage, and experience and preference of the head and neck oncologist. If CT is required for staging of the primary tumor, additional staging of the neck by UGFNAB does not provide significant additional value