14 research outputs found

    Quantifying the Influence of Surface Texture and Shape on Structure from Motion 3D Reconstructions

    Get PDF
    In general, optical methods for geometrical measurements are influenced by the surface properties of the examined object. In Structure from Motion (SfM), local variations in surface color or topography are necessary for detecting feature points for point-cloud triangulation. Thus, the level of contrast or texture is important for an accurate reconstruction. However, quantitative studies of the influence of surface texture on geometrical reconstruction are largely missing. This study tries to remedy that by investigating the influence of object texture levels on reconstruction accuracy using a set of reference artifacts. The artifacts are designed with well-defined surface geometries, and quantitative metrics are introduced to evaluate the lateral resolution, vertical geometric variation, and spatial–frequency information of the reconstructions. The influence of texture level is compared to variations in capturing range. For the SfM measurements, the ContextCapture software solution and a 50 Mpx DSLR camera are used. The findings are compared to results using calibrated optical microscopes. The results show that the proposed pipeline can be used for investigating the influence of texture on SfM reconstructions. The introduced metrics allow for a quantitative comparison of the reconstructions at varying texture levels and ranges. Both range and texture level are seen to affect the reconstructed geometries although in different ways. While an increase in range at a fixed focal length reduces the spatial resolution, an insufficient texture level causes an increased noise level and may introduce errors in the reconstruction. The artifacts are designed to be easily replicable, and by providing a step-by-step procedure of our testing and comparison methodology, we hope that other researchers will make use of the proposed testing pipeline

    A two‐dimensional quantitative parametric investigation of simplified surface imperfections on the aerodynamic characteristics of a NACA 63<sub>3</sub>‐418 airfoil

    No full text
    Abstract The aerodynamic performance of a NACA 633‐418 airfoil has been analyzed with disturbances in approximately 1000 different configurations focused on the frontal 10% of the airfoil. The configuration parameters are based on field test samples and rain erosion test specimens. The most important trends are presented by 500 configurations each simulated for 6°, 8°, and 10° angle of attack. The simulations are performed with the DTU Wind Energy in‐house 2D CFD Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes solver, EllipSys2D, combined with the eN transition model for the laminar‐turbulent boundary layer transition. The configurations are modeled by a direct geometrical modification of the airfoil shape. The results show that the most important parameters are the position and the depth/height of the disturbance, with up to 35% lift reduction and 90% lift/drag reduction within the specified angle of attacks and disturbance parameter ranges

    Wind tunnel experiments on a NACA 63<sub>3</sub>‐418 airfoil with different types of leading edge roughness

    No full text
    Abstract The NACA 633‐418 airfoil has been tested in the new Poul la Cour Wind Tunnel at the Technical University of Denmark, Risø campus, to expand the publicly available data of airfoils with leading edge roughness. The airfoil was constructed with an exchangeable leading edge. The clean airfoil showed good agreement with results from other high‐quality wind tunnels. The airfoil was equipped with three heights of zigzag tape, a trip strip, three sandpaper types, and leading edge cavities with different modifications. In general, increasing zigzag tape heights reduce the maximum lift, whereas the increase in drag is less affected by the zigzag tape height. Almost the same reduction in maximum lift is seen for the different sandpaper types. However, the drag increases with the coarseness of the sandpaper. The highest zigzag tape and coarsest sandpaper resulted in the highest penalty on the aerodynamics. A combination of sandpaper and cavities showed the largest reduction in maximum lift and the highest increase in drag
    corecore