The bipolar disorder prodrome revisited: Is there a symptomatic pattern?

Objectives: To assess the phenomenology and course of pre-(hypo)manic and pre-depressed prodromal symptoms, including mood swings, as precursors of bipolar disorder (BD) in a German multi-center study. Methods: Semi-structured interviews [Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale-Retrospective (BPSS-R); Semi-structured Interview for Mood Swings] were administered to patients within 8 years of BD (BD I, BD II) onset. Results: Forty two outpatients were included (40.5% male, mean age 35.1 +/- 10.0 years, illness onset at 30.5 +/- 9.5 years) Feeling extremely energetic (85.7%), racing thoughts (78.6%), physical agitation (76.2%), overtalkativeness (71.4%), and low sleep requirement (71.4%) occurred most frequently prior to the first (hypo) manic episode, whereas depressed mood (83.0%), reduced vitality (81.0%), physical exhaustion (78.6%), tiredness (76.2%), and insomnia (66.7%) preceded pre-depressively. Mood lability (p=.006), odd ideas (p=.003) and the psychosis index score (p=.003) differed significantly in prevalence depending on the episodes mood. Extremely energetic (p=.046), overtalkativeness (p<.001), and racing thoughts (p=.013) lasted significantly longer prior to depression. Neither severity nor frequency of prodromal symptoms differed significantly. Most of the symptoms emerged during the proximal prodromal phase. Links between mood swings and subsequent BD were found. Limitations: Symptoms were evaluated retrospectively with self-reporting tools in bipolar patients from academic treatment settings without comparison to clinical controls. Conclusions: Not only specific depressive or manic but also general symptoms occurred prior to both affective episodes. The pre-depressive prodrome lasted longer than the pre-manic one, but severity and frequency did not differ significantly. Mood swings and disturbed diurnal rhythm occurred prior to both episodes as early signs of BD. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserve

Evaluation of the ‘jumping to conclusions’ bias in different subgroups of the at-risk mental state: from cognitive basic symptoms to UHR criteria

Background. Patients with psychosis display the so-called 'Jumping to Conclusions' bias (JTC) - a tendency for hasty decision-making in probabilistic reasoning tasks. So far, only a few studies have evaluated the JTC bias in 'at-risk mental state' (ARMS) patients, specifically in ARMS samples fulfilling 'ultra-high risk' (UHR) criteria, thus not allowing for comparisons between different ARMS subgroups. Method. In the framework of the PREVENT (secondary prevention of schizophrenia) study, a JTC task was applied to 188 patients either fulfilling UHR criteria or presenting with cognitive basic symptoms (BS). Similar data were available for 30 healthy control participants matched for age, gender, education and premorbid verbal intelligence. ARMS patients were identified by the Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms (SIPS) and the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument - Adult Version (SPI-A). Results. The mean number of draws to decision (DTD) significantly differed between ARM - subgroups: UHR patients made significantly less draws to make a decision than ARMS patients with only cognitive BS. Furthermore, UHR patients tended to fulfil behavioural criteria for JTC more often than BS patients. In a secondary analysis, ARMS patients were much hastier in their decision-making than controls. In patients, DTD was moderately associated with positive and negative symptoms as well as disorganization and excitement. Conclusions. Our data indicate an enhanced JTC bias in the UHR group compared to ARMS patients with only cognitive BS. This underscores the importance of reasoning deficits within cognitive theories of the developing psychosis. Interactions with the liability to psychotic transitions and therapeutic interventions should be unravelled in longitudinal studies