Design and Calibration of a Full Scale Active Magnetic Bearing Based Test Facility for Investigating Rotordynamic Properties of Turbomachinery Seals in Multiphase Flow

The recent move toward subsea oil and gas production brings about a requirement to locate process equipment in deepwater installations. Furthermore, there is a drive toward omitting well stream separation functionality, as this adds complexity and cost to the subsea installation. This in turn leads to technical challenges for the subsea installed pumps and compressors that are now required to handle multiphase flow of varying gas to liquid ratios. This highlights the necessity for a strong research focus on multiphase flow impact on rotordynamic properties and thereby operational stability of the subsea installed rotating machinery. It is well known that careful design of turbomachinery seals, such as interstage and balance piston seals, is pivotal for the performance of pumps and compressors. Consequently, the ability to predict the complex interaction between fluid dynamics and rotordynamics within these seals is key. Numerical tools offering predictive capabilities for turbomachinery seals in multiphase flow are currently being developed and refined, however the lack of experimental data for multiphase seals renders benchmarking and validation impossible. To this end, the Technical University of Denmark and Lloyd's Register Consulting are currently establishing a purpose built state of the art multiphase seal test facility, which is divided into three modules. Module I consists of a full scale active magnetic bearing (AMB) based rotordynamic test bench. The internally designed custom AMBs are equipped with an embedded Hall sensor system enabling high-precision noncontact seal force quantification. Module II is a fully automatized calibration facility for the Hall sensor based force quantification system. Module III consists of the test seal housing assembly. This paper provides details on the design of the novel test facility and the calibration of the Hall sensor system employed to measure AMB forces. Calibration and validation results are presented, along with an uncertainty analysis on the force quantification capabilities.</jats:p

Numerical and experimental analysis of instability in high temperature packed-bed rock thermal energy storage systems

Due to heat losses of preferential areas of packed-bed energy storage systems, transverse temperature variations may occur during the charging, discharging and standby processes. Furthermore, the heat losses of preferential areas of the storage tank cause a lower pressure drop in these areas resulting in an increased mass flow rate and further cooling, and thereby an enhanced transverse temperature variation, in a positive feedback loop – a phenomenon called instability. The transverse temperature variations may deteriorate the performance and thereby the economic feasibility of packed-bed energy storage systems. In this paper, numerical and experimental investigations of an air-based packed-bed rock thermal energy storage system for large-scale high temperature applications are presented. The objective of the study is to predict the instability and to analyze the effect of different standby durations and storage size on the instability of the air-based packed-bed system. Transient axisymmetric computational fluid dynamics models were developed for the standby and discharging processes of the packed-bed thermal energy storage systems. In addition, experimental investigations were carried out at a test facility located at Stiesdal Storage, Denmark, using magnetite rocks as heat storage material and air as heat transfer fluid. The results suggest that the numerical predictions are in good agreement with the test data. The instability phenomenon is found to increase with the standby duration, resulting in a maximum difference of 161 K between the maximum rock temperature and the outlet air temperature for a standby period of 10 h followed by a discharging process. Moreover, the results indicate that the maximum difference between the rock temperature and outlet temperature is 73 K and 56 K for a reduced-scale and a full-scale system (no standby period), respectively