Visualizing the Influence of Social Networks on Recovery:A Mixed-Methods Social Identity Mapping Study with Recovering Adolescents

BackgroundSocial recovery capital (SRC) refers to resources and supports gained through relationships and is vital to adolescent addiction recovery. Much is known about how substance use relates to social networks, but little is known about how other dimensions of social networks influence recovery (e.g., network size/exposure, degree of conflict). MethodsThis mixed-methods study sampled 28 adolescents who received treatment for alcohol and other drug (AOD) use disorder (14-19 yrs.: 71% male; M=17.32 yrs., SD=1.33; White 82%): 20 were recovery high school (RHS) students. Adolescents completed a social identity map for addiction recovery (SIM-AR), survey, and interview. Qualitative data were content analyzed and the data from the SIM-AR were quantified. ResultsOn average, participants reported belonging to five having 5 distinct groups (Range, 2-9; SD=1.63; M=27.89 people, SD = 20.09) in their network. Of their social network connections, on average, 51% drank alcohol and 46% used other substances. Larger networks involved more conflict (r=0.57). Participants were more likely to spend more time with groups that had greater proportions of non-substance usinge members; these relationships were stronger for RHS than for non-RHS students. Qualitative analyses revealed that youth reported their recovery-oriented groups as supportive, yet some felt their substance-using friends also supported their recovery.DiscussionSIM-AR was a useful measurement tool, and, through qualitative interviews, we identified unique aspects of youth’s social networks important for further examination. Research with recovering youth should examine SRC-related elements within their networks including relationship quality, belonging, and conflict, in addition to the substance use behaviors of network members. <br/

Implementing a recovery capital model into therapeutic courts: Case study and lessons learned:Case study and lessons learned

Recovery capital is a strengths-based and multi-level model for examining the process and outputs of recovery and desistance. Recovery capital posits that the more positive resources one accrues, the better the chances of recovery. Oftentimes growth of one’s recovery capital must be initiated through identifying programs in the community to create supportive scaffolding: this may be especially true for individuals involved in the justice system. This manuscript presents the results of a pilot evaluation of the REC-CAP, a recovery-capital oriented system of measurement, planning, and engagement in two drug treatment courts. We include a description of the implementation process and results from surveys and focus groups with the court staff. Results suggests that the trainings were useful and that court staff meaningfully engaged with the REC-CAP system. Court staff felt the REC-CAP provided important information about court clients’ strengths and barriers and suggested next steps for staff to take to guide their clients. Future work should explore how the REC-CAP score profile may change with progress through the court phases as well as how to incorporate more system-level supports for a REC-CAP orientation among probation officers and other court staff