The effect of pH, electrolytes and temperature on the rhizosphere geochemistry of phytosiderophores

Background and aims: Graminaceous plants are grown worldwide as staple crops under a variety of climatic and soil conditions. They release phytosiderophores for Fe acquisition (Strategy II). Aim of the present study was to uncover how the rhizosphere pH, background electrolyte and temperature affect the mobilization of Fe and other metals from soil by phytosiderophores. Methods: For this purpose a series of kinetic batch interaction experiments with the phytosiderophore 2′-deoxymugineic acid (DMA), a calcareous clay soil and a mildly acidic sandy soil were performed. The temperature, electrolyte concentration and applied electrolyte cation were varied. The effect of pH was examined by applying two levels of lime and Cu to the acidic soil. Results: Fe mobilization by DMA increased by lime application, and was negatively affected by Cu amendment. Mobilization of Fe and other metals decreased with increasing ionic strength, and was lower for divalent than for monovalent electrolyte cations at equal ionic strength, due to higher adsorption of metal-DMA complexes to the soil. Metal mobilization rates increased with increasing temperature leading to a faster onset of competition; Fe was mobilized faster, but also became depleted faster at higher temperature. Temperature also affected biodegradation rates of metal-DMA complexes. Conclusion: Rhizosphere pH, electrolyte type and concentration and temperature can have a pronounced effect on Strategy II Fe acquisition by affecting the time and concentration ‘window of Fe uptake’ in which plants can benefit from phytosiderophore-mediated Fe uptake.© The Author(s) 201

Retention of phytosiderophores by the soil solid phase – adsorption and desorption

Background and aims: Graminaceous plants exude phytosiderophores (PS) for acquiring Fe. Adsorption of PS and its metal complexes to the soil solid phase reduces the FePS solution concentration and hence Fe uptake. In this study we aimed to quantify adsorption, and to determine to what extent adsorption depends on the complexed metal and on soil properties. Furthermore, we examined if adsorption is a reversible process. Methods: Adsorption and desorption of PS and metal-PS complexes were examined in batch experiments in which the PS 2′-deoxymugineic acid (DMA) and its metal-complexes (FeDMA, CuDMA, NiDMA and ZnDMA) interacted with several calcareous soils. Results: Adsorption of DMA ligand (0–1000 μM) and metal-DMA complexes (0–100 μM) was linear in the concentration range examined. Adsorption varied by a factor ≈2 depending on the complexed metal and by up to a factor 3.5 depending on the soil. Under field-like conditions (50 % water holding capacity), 50–84 % of the DMA was predicted to be retained to the soil solid phase. Alike adsorption, desorption of metal-DMA complexes is fast (approximate equilibrium within 1 hour). However, only a small fraction of the adsorbed FeDMA (28–35 %) could be desorbed. Conclusions: Despite this small fraction, the desorbed FeDMA still exceeded the amount in solution, indicating that desorption of FeDMA from soil reactive compounds can be an important process buffering the solution concentration